From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] crypto: ARM/arm64 - big endian fixes
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:15:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161019091549.GF9193@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu_A1XOL=yST_isyvMZL=9wUcuiFXdfmOqw7PO5te24Ktw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 09:49:46AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 19 October 2016 at 09:46, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:03:33AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >> I was planning merging these for 4.10. But I'm fine with them
> >> going through the arm tree. Let me know what you guys want to
> >> do.
> >
> > I assumed you'd take them through crypto, as per usual, so I didn't
> > queue anything in the arm64 tree.
> >
> > Ard -- were you planning to get these in for 4.9?
> >
>
> These are arguably bug fixes, but I spotted them by accident, they
> weren't reported to me or anything. But it seems strange to add a cc
> stable and then hold off until the next merge window.
>
> In any case, I don't care deeply either way, as long as they get
> merged in the end. I think it makes sense to keep them together (arm64
> + ARM), so Herbert's tree is a more natural route for them to take. I
> will leave it up to Herbert whether they are sent onward as fixes or
> as part of v4.10
Sounds good to me.
Will
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/8] crypto: ARM/arm64 - big endian fixes
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:15:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161019091549.GF9193@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu_A1XOL=yST_isyvMZL=9wUcuiFXdfmOqw7PO5te24Ktw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 09:49:46AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 19 October 2016 at 09:46, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:03:33AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >> I was planning merging these for 4.10. But I'm fine with them
> >> going through the arm tree. Let me know what you guys want to
> >> do.
> >
> > I assumed you'd take them through crypto, as per usual, so I didn't
> > queue anything in the arm64 tree.
> >
> > Ard -- were you planning to get these in for 4.9?
> >
>
> These are arguably bug fixes, but I spotted them by accident, they
> weren't reported to me or anything. But it seems strange to add a cc
> stable and then hold off until the next merge window.
>
> In any case, I don't care deeply either way, as long as they get
> merged in the end. I think it makes sense to keep them together (arm64
> + ARM), so Herbert's tree is a more natural route for them to take. I
> will leave it up to Herbert whether they are sent onward as fixes or
> as part of v4.10
Sounds good to me.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-19 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-11 18:15 [PATCH v2 0/8] crypto: ARM/arm64 - big endian fixes Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-11 18:15 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-11 18:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] crypto: arm64/aes-ce - fix for big endian Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-11 18:15 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-11 18:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] crypto: arm64/ghash-ce " Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-11 18:15 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-11 18:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] crypto: arm64/sha1-ce " Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-11 18:15 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-11 18:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] crypto: arm64/sha2-ce " Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-11 18:15 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-11 18:15 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] crypto: arm64/aes-ccm-ce: " Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-11 18:15 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-11 18:15 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] crypto: arm64/aes-neon - " Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-11 18:15 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-11 18:15 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] crypto: arm64/aes-xts-ce: " Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-11 18:15 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-11 18:15 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] crypto: arm/aes-ce - " Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-11 18:15 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-18 10:55 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] crypto: ARM/arm64 - big endian fixes Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-18 10:55 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-18 11:49 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-10-18 11:49 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-10-18 12:14 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-18 12:14 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-19 3:03 ` Herbert Xu
2016-10-19 3:03 ` Herbert Xu
2016-10-19 8:46 ` Will Deacon
2016-10-19 8:46 ` Will Deacon
2016-10-19 8:49 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-19 8:49 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-19 9:15 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2016-10-19 9:15 ` Will Deacon
2016-10-21 3:16 ` Herbert Xu
2016-10-21 3:16 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161019091549.GF9193@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.