Re: [PATCH v6 00/16] ACPI IORT ARM SMMU support

[Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>]

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:24:48PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
> <lorenzo.pieralisi-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > Rafael, Joerg (and anyone else CC'ed),
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 05:03:58PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> >> This patch series is v6 of a previous posting:
> >>
> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/9/9/418
> >>
> >> v5 -> v6
> >>       - Rebased against v4.9-rc1
> >>       - Changed FWNODE_IOMMU to FWNODE_ACPI_STATIC
> >>       - Moved platform devices creation into IORT code
> >>       - Updated fwnode handling
> >>       - Added default dma masks initialization
> >
> > Any comments on v6 ? Patches touching generic ACPI code
> > are {1, 2, 7}, patch 4 updates the IOMMU of_iommu_{set/get}_ops()
> > API to make it work on ACPI systems too, by replacing the
> > device_node with a fwnode_handle pointer as look-up token;
> > the remainder of patches are ARM specific and creates the
> > infrastructure to probe ARM SMMU devices through ACPI,
> > ARM IORT table in particular. Given the generic bits changes
> > above I would not leave it to late -rc to reach an agreement
> > please, thank you.
> 
> I'll do my best to look at these in the next few days, but please also
> note what I wrote before:
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=147744344531599&w=2

Thanks, understood, I asked because if I have to respin it I'd like
to do it asap and the generic ACPI patches are simple but fundamental
to the series, anyway I think it is something we can manage next week
at LPC.

Thanks !
Lorenzo