From: jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com (Jason Gunthorpe)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] fpga zynq: Check the bitstream for validity
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:48:19 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161028154819.GD10441@obsidianresearch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7950dec2-cc69-6304-ea2d-92b1a890214e@suse.com>
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 01:12:06PM +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> >Zynq is also only able to DMA dword quantities, so bitstreams must be
> >a multiple of 4 bytes. This also fixes a DMA-past the end bug.
>
> The you can also fix the transfer_length calculation in zynq_fpga_ops_write,
> as we don't allow buffers which are not a multiple of 4.
Didn't I do that? Did you see something else to change in the dma
part?
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-28 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-26 22:54 [PATCH] fpga zynq: Check the bitstream for validity Jason Gunthorpe
2016-10-27 7:42 ` Michal Simek
2016-10-27 14:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-10-27 8:50 ` Matthias Brugger
2016-10-27 14:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-10-28 11:06 ` Matthias Brugger
2016-10-28 15:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-10-28 16:36 ` Matthias Brugger
2016-10-28 16:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-10-28 18:23 ` Moritz Fischer
2016-10-28 20:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-10-28 21:00 ` Moritz Fischer
2016-10-28 22:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-10-29 0:09 ` Moritz Fischer
2016-10-31 16:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-11-01 6:39 ` Michal Simek
2016-11-01 15:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-11-01 17:48 ` Michal Simek
2016-11-08 0:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-11-09 14:21 ` Mike Looijmans
2016-11-09 15:18 ` Matthias Brugger
2016-11-09 16:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-11-09 15:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-11-09 17:31 ` Mike Looijmans
2016-11-28 18:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-11-08 0:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-11-08 9:59 ` Matthias Brugger
2016-11-08 16:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-10-28 11:12 ` Matthias Brugger
2016-10-28 15:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2016-10-28 16:37 ` Matthias Brugger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161028154819.GD10441@obsidianresearch.com \
--to=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.