All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com (Jason Gunthorpe)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] fpga zynq: Check the bitstream for validity
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 09:00:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161109160003.GB15076@obsidianresearch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ab7684fe-2407-330e-9001-21dccc781983@suse.com>

On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 04:18:29PM +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:

> I get your point. Especially looping to the whole file to find the sync
> header can take a while, especially if the file is big and the sync header
> is not present.

Er, no not at all. If you send garbage to the FPGA the driver detects
it after a 2.5s timeout. The memory scan is always alot faster.

In the normal success case it is ~5 compares.

> So I think the whole idea behind this patch is to provide feedback to the
> user about what went wrong when trying to update the FPGA. Is there a way to
> get this information from the hardware which discards the update?

No, not with such specificity.

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-09 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-26 22:54 [PATCH] fpga zynq: Check the bitstream for validity Jason Gunthorpe
2016-10-27  7:42 ` Michal Simek
2016-10-27 14:32   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-10-27  8:50 ` Matthias Brugger
2016-10-27 14:39   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-10-28 11:06     ` Matthias Brugger
2016-10-28 15:47       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-10-28 16:36         ` Matthias Brugger
2016-10-28 16:55           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-10-28 18:23             ` Moritz Fischer
2016-10-28 20:26               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-10-28 21:00                 ` Moritz Fischer
2016-10-28 22:05                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-10-29  0:09                     ` Moritz Fischer
2016-10-31 16:23                       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-11-01  6:39                         ` Michal Simek
2016-11-01 15:33                           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-11-01 17:48                             ` Michal Simek
2016-11-08  0:05                               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-11-09 14:21                                 ` Mike Looijmans
2016-11-09 15:18                                   ` Matthias Brugger
2016-11-09 16:00                                     ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2016-11-09 15:56                                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-11-09 17:31                                     ` Mike Looijmans
2016-11-28 18:00                                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-11-08  0:46                       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-11-08  9:59                         ` Matthias Brugger
2016-11-08 16:24                           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-10-28 11:12 ` Matthias Brugger
2016-10-28 15:48   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-10-28 16:37     ` Matthias Brugger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161109160003.GB15076@obsidianresearch.com \
    --to=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.