From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] f2fs: use __set_page_dirty_nobuffers directly
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 10:23:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161102172341.GB48728@jaegeuk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4d3fd0f9-046e-82fc-3830-487a167e7700@huawei.com>
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 03:34:32PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> On 2016/10/21 10:28, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > This patch replaces the copied code with original generic function.
>
> Will we plan to do further enhance inside f2fs_set_page_dirty_nobuffers, if we
> don't it's better revert fe76b796fc5194cc3d57265002e3a748566d073f, as we don't
> need to wrap __set_page_dirty_nobuffers.
Urg. I was confused something here.
Please ignore this patch. I won't merge this patch.
> BTW, does the original patch make memory cgroup functionality problematic?
I don't think there is a problem, since I just copied __set_page_dirty_buffers()
except page_has_buffers' stuffs.
Thank you for pointing this out. :)
>
> Thanks,
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/data.c | 29 -----------------------------
> > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 6 +++++-
> > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > index 68edb47..3954315 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > @@ -1801,35 +1801,6 @@ int f2fs_release_page(struct page *page, gfp_t wait)
> > return 1;
> > }
> >
> > -/*
> > - * This was copied from __set_page_dirty_buffers which gives higher performance
> > - * in very high speed storages. (e.g., pmem)
> > - */
> > -void f2fs_set_page_dirty_nobuffers(struct page *page)
> > -{
> > - struct address_space *mapping = page->mapping;
> > - unsigned long flags;
> > -
> > - if (unlikely(!mapping))
> > - return;
> > -
> > - spin_lock(&mapping->private_lock);
> > - lock_page_memcg(page);
> > - SetPageDirty(page);
> > - spin_unlock(&mapping->private_lock);
> > -
> > - spin_lock_irqsave(&mapping->tree_lock, flags);
> > - WARN_ON_ONCE(!PageUptodate(page));
> > - account_page_dirtied(page, mapping);
> > - radix_tree_tag_set(&mapping->page_tree,
> > - page_index(page), PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY);
> > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mapping->tree_lock, flags);
> > - unlock_page_memcg(page);
> > -
> > - __mark_inode_dirty(mapping->host, I_DIRTY_PAGES);
> > - return;
> > -}
> > -
> > static int f2fs_set_data_page_dirty(struct page *page)
> > {
> > struct address_space *mapping = page->mapping;
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > index 168f939..b66a04c 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > @@ -1960,6 +1960,11 @@ static inline unsigned long f2fs_find_next_bit(const void *addr,
> > return find_next_bit(addr, size, offset + 2);
> > }
> >
> > +static inline void f2fs_set_page_dirty_nobuffers(struct page *page)
> > +{
> > + __set_page_dirty_nobuffers(page);
> > +}
> > +
> > #define get_inode_mode(i) \
> > ((is_inode_flag_set(i, FI_ACL_MODE)) ? \
> > (F2FS_I(i)->i_acl_mode) : ((i)->i_mode))
> > @@ -2200,7 +2205,6 @@ struct page *get_new_data_page(struct inode *, struct page *, pgoff_t, bool);
> > int do_write_data_page(struct f2fs_io_info *);
> > int f2fs_map_blocks(struct inode *, struct f2fs_map_blocks *, int, int);
> > int f2fs_fiemap(struct inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *, u64, u64);
> > -void f2fs_set_page_dirty_nobuffers(struct page *);
> > void f2fs_invalidate_page(struct page *, unsigned int, unsigned int);
> > int f2fs_release_page(struct page *, gfp_t);
> > #ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
Training and support from Colfax.
Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/3] f2fs: use __set_page_dirty_nobuffers directly
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 10:23:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161102172341.GB48728@jaegeuk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4d3fd0f9-046e-82fc-3830-487a167e7700@huawei.com>
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 03:34:32PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> On 2016/10/21 10:28, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > This patch replaces the copied code with original generic function.
>
> Will we plan to do further enhance inside f2fs_set_page_dirty_nobuffers, if we
> don't it's better revert fe76b796fc5194cc3d57265002e3a748566d073f, as we don't
> need to wrap __set_page_dirty_nobuffers.
Urg. I was confused something here.
Please ignore this patch. I won't merge this patch.
> BTW, does the original patch make memory cgroup functionality problematic?
I don't think there is a problem, since I just copied __set_page_dirty_buffers()
except page_has_buffers' stuffs.
Thank you for pointing this out. :)
>
> Thanks,
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/data.c | 29 -----------------------------
> > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 6 +++++-
> > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > index 68edb47..3954315 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > @@ -1801,35 +1801,6 @@ int f2fs_release_page(struct page *page, gfp_t wait)
> > return 1;
> > }
> >
> > -/*
> > - * This was copied from __set_page_dirty_buffers which gives higher performance
> > - * in very high speed storages. (e.g., pmem)
> > - */
> > -void f2fs_set_page_dirty_nobuffers(struct page *page)
> > -{
> > - struct address_space *mapping = page->mapping;
> > - unsigned long flags;
> > -
> > - if (unlikely(!mapping))
> > - return;
> > -
> > - spin_lock(&mapping->private_lock);
> > - lock_page_memcg(page);
> > - SetPageDirty(page);
> > - spin_unlock(&mapping->private_lock);
> > -
> > - spin_lock_irqsave(&mapping->tree_lock, flags);
> > - WARN_ON_ONCE(!PageUptodate(page));
> > - account_page_dirtied(page, mapping);
> > - radix_tree_tag_set(&mapping->page_tree,
> > - page_index(page), PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY);
> > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mapping->tree_lock, flags);
> > - unlock_page_memcg(page);
> > -
> > - __mark_inode_dirty(mapping->host, I_DIRTY_PAGES);
> > - return;
> > -}
> > -
> > static int f2fs_set_data_page_dirty(struct page *page)
> > {
> > struct address_space *mapping = page->mapping;
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > index 168f939..b66a04c 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > @@ -1960,6 +1960,11 @@ static inline unsigned long f2fs_find_next_bit(const void *addr,
> > return find_next_bit(addr, size, offset + 2);
> > }
> >
> > +static inline void f2fs_set_page_dirty_nobuffers(struct page *page)
> > +{
> > + __set_page_dirty_nobuffers(page);
> > +}
> > +
> > #define get_inode_mode(i) \
> > ((is_inode_flag_set(i, FI_ACL_MODE)) ? \
> > (F2FS_I(i)->i_acl_mode) : ((i)->i_mode))
> > @@ -2200,7 +2205,6 @@ struct page *get_new_data_page(struct inode *, struct page *, pgoff_t, bool);
> > int do_write_data_page(struct f2fs_io_info *);
> > int f2fs_map_blocks(struct inode *, struct f2fs_map_blocks *, int, int);
> > int f2fs_fiemap(struct inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *, u64, u64);
> > -void f2fs_set_page_dirty_nobuffers(struct page *);
> > void f2fs_invalidate_page(struct page *, unsigned int, unsigned int);
> > int f2fs_release_page(struct page *, gfp_t);
> > #ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-02 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-21 2:28 [PATCH 1/3] f2fs: add fast path for find_next_{zero}bit Jaegeuk Kim
2016-10-21 2:28 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-10-21 2:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] f2fs: use __set_page_dirty_nobuffers directly Jaegeuk Kim
2016-10-21 2:28 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-11-02 7:34 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2016-11-02 7:34 ` Chao Yu
2016-11-02 17:23 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2016-11-02 17:23 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-11-03 9:50 ` Chao Yu
2016-11-03 9:50 ` Chao Yu
2016-11-03 17:57 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-11-04 15:51 ` Chao Yu
2016-11-04 15:51 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2016-10-21 2:28 ` [PATCH 3/3] f2fs: remove percpu_count due to performance regression Jaegeuk Kim
2016-10-21 10:35 ` [PATCH 1/3] f2fs: add fast path for find_next_{zero}bit Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161102172341.GB48728@jaegeuk \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.