From: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>
To: Phil Turmel <philip@turmel.org>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@metamorpher.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: clearing blocks wrongfully marked as bad if --update=no-bbl can't be used?
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 11:18:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161104181808.lplrtmafwlub3ck4@merlins.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161030171654.GE28648@merlins.org>
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 10:16:54AM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> myth:~# mdadm --assemble --update=force-no-bbl /dev/md5
> mdadm: /dev/md5 has been started with 5 drives.
> myth:~#
> myth:~# mdadm --examine-badblocks /dev/sd[defgh]1
> No bad-blocks list configured on /dev/sdd1
> No bad-blocks list configured on /dev/sde1
> No bad-blocks list configured on /dev/sdf1
> No bad-blocks list configured on /dev/sdg1
> No bad-blocks list configured on /dev/sdh1
>
> Now I'll make sure to turn off this feature on all my other arrays
> in case it got turned on without my asking for it.
Right, so I thought I was home free, but not even close. My array is
back up, the badblock feature is disabled, array reports clean, but I
cannot access data past 8.8TB, it just fails.
myth:~# dd if=/dev/md5 of=/dev/null bs=1GB skip=8797
dd: reading `/dev/md5': Invalid argument
0+0 records in
0+0 records out
0 bytes (0 B) copied, 0.000403171 s, 0.0 kB/s
myth:~# dd if=/dev/md5 of=/dev/null bs=1GB skip=8796
dd: reading `/dev/md5': Invalid argument
1+0 records in
1+0 records out
1000000000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 10.5817 s, 94.5 MB/s
myth:~# mdadm --query --detail /dev/md5
/dev/md5:
Version : 1.2
Creation Time : Tue Jan 21 10:35:52 2014
Raid Level : raid5
Array Size : 15627542528 (14903.59 GiB 16002.60 GB)
Used Dev Size : 3906885632 (3725.90 GiB 4000.65 GB)
Raid Devices : 5
Total Devices : 5
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
Intent Bitmap : Internal
Update Time : Mon Oct 31 07:56:07 2016
State : clean
Active Devices : 5
Working Devices : 5
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 512K
Name : gargamel.svh.merlins.org:5
UUID : ec672af7:a66d9557:2f00d76c:38c9f705
Events : 147992
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 8 97 0 active sync /dev/sdg1
6 8 113 1 active sync /dev/sdh1
2 8 81 2 active sync /dev/sdf1
3 8 65 3 active sync /dev/sde1
5 8 49 4 active sync /dev/sdd1
myth:~#
myth:~# mdadm --examine /dev/sdd1
/dev/sdd1:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 1.2
Feature Map : 0x1
Array UUID : ec672af7:a66d9557:2f00d76c:38c9f705
Name : gargamel.svh.merlins.org:5
Creation Time : Tue Jan 21 10:35:52 2014
Raid Level : raid5
Raid Devices : 5
Avail Dev Size : 7813771264 (3725.90 GiB 4000.65 GB)
Array Size : 15627542528 (14903.59 GiB 16002.60 GB)
Data Offset : 262144 sectors
Super Offset : 8 sectors
Unused Space : before=262064 sectors, after=0 sectors
State : clean
Device UUID : 075571ff:411517e9:027f8c2f:cef0457a
Internal Bitmap : 8 sectors from superblock
Update Time : Mon Oct 31 07:56:07 2016
Checksum : d4e74521 - correct
Events : 147992
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 512K
Device Role : Active device 4
Array State : AAAAA ('A' == active, '.' == missing, 'R' == replacing)
all 5 devices look about the same outside of serial numbers.
Any idea why it's failing that way?
Thanks,
Marc
--
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | PGP 1024R/763BE901
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-04 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-30 2:16 Buffer I/O error on dev md5, logical block 7073536, async page read Marc MERLIN
2016-10-30 9:33 ` Andreas Klauer
2016-10-30 15:38 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-10-30 16:19 ` Andreas Klauer
2016-10-30 16:34 ` Phil Turmel
2016-10-30 17:12 ` clearing blocks wrongfully marked as bad if --update=no-bbl can't be used? Marc MERLIN
2016-10-30 17:16 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-04 18:18 ` Marc MERLIN [this message]
2016-11-04 18:22 ` Phil Turmel
2016-11-04 18:50 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-04 18:59 ` Roman Mamedov
2016-11-04 19:31 ` Roman Mamedov
2016-11-04 20:02 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-04 19:51 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-07 0:16 ` NeilBrown
2016-11-07 1:13 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-07 3:36 ` Phil Turmel
2016-11-07 1:20 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-07 1:39 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-11-07 4:18 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-11-07 5:36 ` btrfs support for filesystems >8TB on 32bit architectures Marc MERLIN
2016-11-07 6:16 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-11-07 14:55 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-08 0:35 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-11-08 0:39 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-08 0:43 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-11-08 1:06 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-08 1:17 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-11-08 15:24 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-09 1:50 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-11-09 2:05 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-11 3:48 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-11 3:55 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-11-12 3:17 ` when btrfs scrub reports errors and btrfs check --repair does not Marc MERLIN
2016-11-13 15:06 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-13 15:13 ` Roman Mamedov
2016-11-13 15:52 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-10-30 18:56 ` [ LR] Kernel 4.8.4: INFO: task kworker/u16:8:289 blocked for more than 120 seconds TomK
2016-10-30 19:16 ` TomK
2016-10-30 20:13 ` Andreas Klauer
2016-10-30 21:08 ` TomK
2016-10-31 19:29 ` Wols Lists
2016-11-01 2:40 ` TomK
2016-10-30 16:43 ` Buffer I/O error on dev md5, logical block 7073536, async page read Marc MERLIN
2016-10-30 17:02 ` Andreas Klauer
2016-10-31 19:24 ` Wols Lists
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-10-30 18:34 btrfs check --repair: ERROR: cannot read chunk root Marc MERLIN
2016-10-31 1:02 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-10-31 2:06 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-10-31 4:21 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-10-31 5:27 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-10-31 5:47 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-10-31 6:04 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-10-31 6:25 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-10-31 6:32 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-10-31 6:37 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-10-31 7:04 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-10-31 8:44 ` Hugo Mills
2016-10-31 15:04 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-01 3:48 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-01 4:13 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-11-01 4:21 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-04 8:01 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-04 9:00 ` Roman Mamedov
2016-11-04 17:59 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-07 1:11 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161104181808.lplrtmafwlub3ck4@merlins.org \
--to=marc@merlins.org \
--cc=Andreas.Klauer@metamorpher.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=philip@turmel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.