From: Wols Lists <antlists@youngman.org.uk>
To: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>,
Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@metamorpher.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Buffer I/O error on dev md5, logical block 7073536, async page read
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 19:24:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58179A8B.6010507@youngman.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161030164342.GC28648@merlins.org>
On 30/10/16 16:43, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> And here isn't one good drive between the 2, the bad blocks are identical on
> both drives and must have happened at the same time due to those cable
> induced IO errors I mentionned.
> Too bad that mdadm doesn't seem to account for the fact that it could be
> wrong when marking blocks as bad and does not seem to give a way to recover
> from this easily....
> I'll do more reading, thanks.
Reading the list, I've picked up that somehow badblocks seem to get
propagated from one drive to another. So if one drive gets a badblock,
that seems to get marked as bad on other drives too :-(
Oh - and as for badblocks being obsolete, isn't there a load of work
being done on it at the moment? For hardware raid I believe, which
presumably does not handle badblocks the way Phil thinks all modern
drives do? (Not surprising - hardware raid is regularly slated for being
buggy and not a good idea, this is probably more of the same...)
Cheers,
Wol
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-31 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-30 2:16 Buffer I/O error on dev md5, logical block 7073536, async page read Marc MERLIN
2016-10-30 9:33 ` Andreas Klauer
2016-10-30 15:38 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-10-30 16:19 ` Andreas Klauer
2016-10-30 16:34 ` Phil Turmel
2016-10-30 17:12 ` clearing blocks wrongfully marked as bad if --update=no-bbl can't be used? Marc MERLIN
2016-10-30 17:16 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-04 18:18 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-04 18:22 ` Phil Turmel
2016-11-04 18:50 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-04 18:59 ` Roman Mamedov
2016-11-04 19:31 ` Roman Mamedov
2016-11-04 20:02 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-04 19:51 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-07 0:16 ` NeilBrown
2016-11-07 1:13 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-07 3:36 ` Phil Turmel
2016-11-07 1:20 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-07 1:39 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-11-07 4:18 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-11-07 5:36 ` btrfs support for filesystems >8TB on 32bit architectures Marc MERLIN
2016-11-07 6:16 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-11-07 14:55 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-08 0:35 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-11-08 0:39 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-08 0:43 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-11-08 1:06 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-08 1:17 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-11-08 15:24 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-09 1:50 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-11-09 2:05 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-11 3:48 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-11 3:55 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-11-12 3:17 ` when btrfs scrub reports errors and btrfs check --repair does not Marc MERLIN
2016-11-13 15:06 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-13 15:13 ` Roman Mamedov
2016-11-13 15:52 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-10-30 18:56 ` [ LR] Kernel 4.8.4: INFO: task kworker/u16:8:289 blocked for more than 120 seconds TomK
2016-10-30 19:16 ` TomK
2016-10-30 20:13 ` Andreas Klauer
2016-10-30 21:08 ` TomK
2016-10-31 19:29 ` Wols Lists
2016-11-01 2:40 ` TomK
2016-10-30 16:43 ` Buffer I/O error on dev md5, logical block 7073536, async page read Marc MERLIN
2016-10-30 17:02 ` Andreas Klauer
2016-10-31 19:24 ` Wols Lists [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-10-30 18:34 btrfs check --repair: ERROR: cannot read chunk root Marc MERLIN
2016-10-31 1:02 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-10-31 2:06 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-10-31 4:21 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-10-31 5:27 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-10-31 5:47 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-10-31 6:04 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-10-31 6:25 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-10-31 6:32 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-10-31 6:37 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-10-31 7:04 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-10-31 8:44 ` Hugo Mills
2016-10-31 15:04 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-01 3:48 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-01 4:13 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-11-01 4:21 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-04 8:01 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-04 9:00 ` Roman Mamedov
2016-11-04 17:59 ` Marc MERLIN
2016-11-07 1:11 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58179A8B.6010507@youngman.org.uk \
--to=antlists@youngman.org.uk \
--cc=Andreas.Klauer@metamorpher.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc@merlins.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.