Re: [PATCH 1/2] rt: Insert missing NBSPs

["Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 02:52:33AM +0900, SeongJae Park wrote:
> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@gmail.com>

Queued, thank you!

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  rt/rt.tex | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/rt/rt.tex b/rt/rt.tex
> index 21a53a4514b8..870bc9af6e0b 100644
> --- a/rt/rt.tex
> +++ b/rt/rt.tex
> @@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ cylinder contained in the log to the blade,
>  Each of these six phases of operation might well have its own set of
>  deadlines and environmental constraints,
>  for example, one would expect phase~4's deadlines to be much more severe
> -than those of phase 6, milliseconds instead of seconds.
> +than those of phase~6, milliseconds instead of seconds.
>  One might therefore expect that low-priority work would be performed in
>  phase~6 rather than in phase~4.
>  That said, careful choices of hardware, drivers, and software configuration
> @@ -1429,7 +1429,7 @@ only being one runnable task on that CPU is said to be in
>  \emph{adaptive ticks mode}.
> 
>  As an alternative to the \co{nohz_full=} boot parameter, you can build
> -your kernel with \co{NO_HZ_FULL_ALL}, which will designate CPU 0 as
> +your kernel with \co{NO_HZ_FULL_ALL}, which will designate CPU~0 as
>  a housekeeping CPU and all other CPUs as worker CPUs.
>  Either way, it is important to ensure that you have designated enough
>  housekeeping CPUs to handle the housekeeping load imposed by the
> -- 
> 2.10.0
>