All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Yazen Ghannam <Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/AMD: Fix cpu_llc_id for AMD Fam17h systems
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 15:07:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161107140746.GA20626@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161107092031.alxfkr6rpctodbdk@pd.tnic>


* Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 08:31:21AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > cpu_llc_id (Last Level Cache ID) derivation on AMD Fam17h has an
> > > underflow bug when extracting the socket_id value. It starts from 0
> 
> How's this...
> 
> > > so subtracting 1 from it will result in an invalid value. This breaks
> > > scheduling topology later on since the cpu_llc_id will be incorrect.
>    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> ... here?
> 
> > Same question as for the previous patch: what are the effects of the bug:
> 
> See above.

There's many ways the scheduling topology can 'break', resulting in different 
effects:

 - scheduling domains might be mixed up to the extent of crashing the bootup

 - some cores might be missing altogether, reducing available CPUs in essence

 - cache domains might be seriously mixed up, resulting in serious drop in 
   performance.

 - or domains might be partitioned 'wrong' but not catastrophically 
   wrong, resulting in a minor performance drop (if at all)

... do we know which of these occurs in this situation?

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-07 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-01 16:51 [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/AMD: Fix cpu_llc_id for AMD Fam17h systems Yazen Ghannam
2016-11-01 16:51 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/AMD: Group cpu_llc_id assignment by topology feature and family Yazen Ghannam
2016-11-02 20:15   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-07  7:29     ` Ingo Molnar
2016-11-07  9:22       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-02 20:13 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/AMD: Fix cpu_llc_id for AMD Fam17h systems Borislav Petkov
2016-11-07  7:31   ` Ingo Molnar
2016-11-07  9:20     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-07 14:07       ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2016-11-07 15:56         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-08  6:31           ` Ingo Molnar
2016-11-08  8:35             ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-08 10:29               ` Ingo Molnar
2016-11-08 11:01                 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-08 14:54                   ` Ingo Molnar
2016-11-08 15:30                     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-10  8:00                       ` [tip:x86/cpu] x86/cpu/AMD: Clean up cpu_llc_id assignment per topology feature tip-bot for Yazen Ghannam
2016-11-09 16:13               ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/cpu/AMD: Fix cpu_llc_id for AMD Fam17h systems tip-bot for Yazen Ghannam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161107140746.GA20626@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.