From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Yazen Ghannam <Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/AMD: Fix cpu_llc_id for AMD Fam17h systems
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 11:29:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161108102909.GA5541@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161108083506.rvqb5h4chrcptj7d@pd.tnic>
* Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 07:31:45AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > So the point I tried to make is that to people doing -stable
> > backporting decisions this description you just gave is much more
> > valuable than the previous changelog.
>
> Ok, how's that below? I've integrated the gist of it in the commit message:
Looks good to me! Please also update the second patch with meta information and I
can apply them.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-08 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-01 16:51 [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/AMD: Fix cpu_llc_id for AMD Fam17h systems Yazen Ghannam
2016-11-01 16:51 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/AMD: Group cpu_llc_id assignment by topology feature and family Yazen Ghannam
2016-11-02 20:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-07 7:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-11-07 9:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-02 20:13 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/AMD: Fix cpu_llc_id for AMD Fam17h systems Borislav Petkov
2016-11-07 7:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-11-07 9:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-07 14:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-11-07 15:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-08 6:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-11-08 8:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-08 10:29 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2016-11-08 11:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-08 14:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-11-08 15:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-11-10 8:00 ` [tip:x86/cpu] x86/cpu/AMD: Clean up cpu_llc_id assignment per topology feature tip-bot for Yazen Ghannam
2016-11-09 16:13 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/cpu/AMD: Fix cpu_llc_id for AMD Fam17h systems tip-bot for Yazen Ghannam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161108102909.GA5541@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.