All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>,
	Christophe Ricard <christophe.ricard@gmail.com>,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI / gpio: avoid warning for gpio hogging code
Date: Tue,  8 Nov 2016 14:40:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161108134035.1764500-1-arnd@arndb.de> (raw)

The newly added acpi_gpiochip_scan_gpios function produces a few harmless
warnings:

drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c: In function ‘acpi_gpiochip_add’:
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c:925:7: error: ‘dflags’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c:925:9: error: ‘lflags’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]

The problem is that he compiler cannot know that a negative return value
from fwnode_property_read_u32_array() or acpi_gpiochip_pin_to_gpio_offset()
implies that the IS_ERR(gpio_desc) is true, as the value could in theory
be below -MAX_ERRNO.

The function already initializes its output values to zero, and moving
that intialization a little higher up ensures that we can never have
uninitialized data in the caller.

Fixes: c80f1ba75df2 ("ACPI / gpio: Add hogging support")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
index 265e0fad518e..a3faefa44f68 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
@@ -869,6 +869,10 @@ static struct gpio_desc *acpi_gpiochip_parse_own_gpio(
 	u32 gpios[2];
 	int ret;
 
+	*lflags = 0;
+	*dflags = 0;
+	*name = NULL;
+
 	ret = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(fwnode, "gpios", gpios,
 					     ARRAY_SIZE(gpios));
 	if (ret < 0)
@@ -882,10 +886,6 @@ static struct gpio_desc *acpi_gpiochip_parse_own_gpio(
 	if (IS_ERR(desc))
 		return desc;
 
-	*lflags = 0;
-	*dflags = 0;
-	*name = NULL;
-
 	if (gpios[1])
 		*lflags |= GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW;
 
-- 
2.9.0

             reply	other threads:[~2016-11-08 13:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-08 13:40 Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-11-08 14:12 ` [PATCH] ACPI / gpio: avoid warning for gpio hogging code Mika Westerberg
2016-11-09  8:44 ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161108134035.1764500-1-arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=christophe.ricard@gmail.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=weiyongjun1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.