All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>,
	Christophe Ricard <christophe.ricard@gmail.com>,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / gpio: avoid warning for gpio hogging code
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 16:12:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161108141248.GA1447@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161108134035.1764500-1-arnd@arndb.de>

On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 02:40:06PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The newly added acpi_gpiochip_scan_gpios function produces a few harmless
> warnings:
> 
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c: In function ‘acpi_gpiochip_add’:
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c:925:7: error: ‘dflags’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c:925:9: error: ‘lflags’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> 
> The problem is that he compiler cannot know that a negative return value
> from fwnode_property_read_u32_array() or acpi_gpiochip_pin_to_gpio_offset()
> implies that the IS_ERR(gpio_desc) is true, as the value could in theory
> be below -MAX_ERRNO.
> 
> The function already initializes its output values to zero, and moving
> that intialization a little higher up ensures that we can never have
> uninitialized data in the caller.
> 
> Fixes: c80f1ba75df2 ("ACPI / gpio: Add hogging support")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-08 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-08 13:40 [PATCH] ACPI / gpio: avoid warning for gpio hogging code Arnd Bergmann
2016-11-08 14:12 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2016-11-09  8:44 ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161108141248.GA1447@lahna.fi.intel.com \
    --to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=christophe.ricard@gmail.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=weiyongjun1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.