All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: TCP performance problems - GSO/TSO, MSS, 8139cp related
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 22:44:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161111224427.GG1041@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1478899423.3892.7.camel@infradead.org>

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 09:23:43PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> It's also *fairly* unlikely that the kernel in the guest has developed
> a bug and isn't setting gso_size sanely. I'm more inclined to suspect
> that qemu isn't properly emulating those bits. But at first glance at
> the code, it looks like *that's* been there for the last decade too...

I take issue with that, having looked at the qemu rtl8139 code:

                if ((txdw0 & CP_TX_LGSEN) && ip_protocol == IP_PROTO_TCP)
                {
                    int large_send_mss = (txdw0 >> 16) & CP_TC_LGSEN_MSS_MASK;

                    DPRINTF("+++ C+ mode offloaded task TSO MTU=%d IP data %d "
                        "frame data %d specified MSS=%d\n", ETH_MTU,
                        ip_data_len, saved_size - ETH_HLEN, large_send_mss);

That's the only reference to "large_send_mss" there, other than that,
the MSS value that gets stuck into the field by 8139cp.c is completely
unused.  Instead, qemu does this:

                eth_payload_data = saved_buffer + ETH_HLEN;
                eth_payload_len  = saved_size   - ETH_HLEN;

                ip = (ip_header*)eth_payload_data;

                    hlen = IP_HEADER_LENGTH(ip);
                    ip_data_len = be16_to_cpu(ip->ip_len) - hlen;

                    tcp_header *p_tcp_hdr = (tcp_header*)(eth_payload_data + hlen);
                    int tcp_hlen = TCP_HEADER_DATA_OFFSET(p_tcp_hdr);

                    /* ETH_MTU = ip header len + tcp header len + payload */
                    int tcp_data_len = ip_data_len - tcp_hlen;
                    int tcp_chunk_size = ETH_MTU - hlen - tcp_hlen;

                    for (tcp_send_offset = 0; tcp_send_offset < tcp_data_len; tcp_send_offset += tcp_chunk_size)
                    {

It uses a fixed value of ETH_MTU to calculate the size of the TCP
data chunks, and this is not surprisingly the well known:

#define ETH_MTU     1500

Qemu seems to be buggy - it ignores the MSS value, and always tries to
send 1500 byte frames.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] TCP performance problems - GSO/TSO, MSS, 8139cp related
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 22:44:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161111224427.GG1041@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1478899423.3892.7.camel@infradead.org>

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 09:23:43PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> It's also *fairly* unlikely that the kernel in the guest has developed
> a bug and isn't setting gso_size sanely. I'm more inclined to suspect
> that qemu isn't properly emulating those bits. But at first glance at
> the code, it looks like *that's* been there for the last decade too...

I take issue with that, having looked at the qemu rtl8139 code:

                if ((txdw0 & CP_TX_LGSEN) && ip_protocol == IP_PROTO_TCP)
                {
                    int large_send_mss = (txdw0 >> 16) & CP_TC_LGSEN_MSS_MASK;

                    DPRINTF("+++ C+ mode offloaded task TSO MTU=%d IP data %d "
                        "frame data %d specified MSS=%d\n", ETH_MTU,
                        ip_data_len, saved_size - ETH_HLEN, large_send_mss);

That's the only reference to "large_send_mss" there, other than that,
the MSS value that gets stuck into the field by 8139cp.c is completely
unused.  Instead, qemu does this:

                eth_payload_data = saved_buffer + ETH_HLEN;
                eth_payload_len  = saved_size   - ETH_HLEN;

                ip = (ip_header*)eth_payload_data;

                    hlen = IP_HEADER_LENGTH(ip);
                    ip_data_len = be16_to_cpu(ip->ip_len) - hlen;

                    tcp_header *p_tcp_hdr = (tcp_header*)(eth_payload_data + hlen);
                    int tcp_hlen = TCP_HEADER_DATA_OFFSET(p_tcp_hdr);

                    /* ETH_MTU = ip header len + tcp header len + payload */
                    int tcp_data_len = ip_data_len - tcp_hlen;
                    int tcp_chunk_size = ETH_MTU - hlen - tcp_hlen;

                    for (tcp_send_offset = 0; tcp_send_offset < tcp_data_len; tcp_send_offset += tcp_chunk_size)
                    {

It uses a fixed value of ETH_MTU to calculate the size of the TCP
data chunks, and this is not surprisingly the well known:

#define ETH_MTU     1500

Qemu seems to be buggy - it ignores the MSS value, and always tries to
send 1500 byte frames.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-11-11 22:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-11 21:05 TCP performance problems - GSO/TSO, MSS, 8139cp related Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-11-11 21:23 ` David Woodhouse
2016-11-11 21:23   ` [Qemu-devel] " David Woodhouse
2016-11-11 22:33   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-11-11 22:33     ` [Qemu-devel] " Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-11-12  2:52     ` David Miller
2016-11-12  2:52       ` [Qemu-devel] " David Miller
2016-11-11 22:44   ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2016-11-11 22:44     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-11-14  9:29     ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-11-14  9:29       ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-11-14 16:25       ` Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161111224427.GG1041@n2100.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.