From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Cc: thierry.reding@gmail.com, tomi.valkeinen@ti.com,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, p.zabel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] backlight: pwm_bl: Move the checks for initial power state to a separate function
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 14:49:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161118144929.GD2301@dell.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161101125933.11168-2-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Thierry, Jingoo,
Please have your say.
> Move the checks to select the initial state for the backlight to a new
> function and document the checks we are doing.
>
> With the separate function it is going to be easier to fix or improve the
> initial power state configuration later and it is easier to read the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> index 12614006211e..4b07da278b4f 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> @@ -192,6 +192,32 @@ static int pwm_backlight_parse_dt(struct device *dev,
> }
> #endif
>
> +static int pwm_backlight_initial_power_state(const struct pwm_bl_data *pb)
> +{
> + struct device_node *node = pb->dev->of_node;
> +
> + /* Not booted with device tree or no phandle link to the node */
> + if (!node || !node->phandle)
> + return FB_BLANK_UNBLANK;
> +
> + /*
> + * If the driver is probed from the device tree and there is a
> + * phandle link pointing to the backlight node, it is safe to
> + * assume that another driver will enable the backlight at the
> + * appropriate time. Therefore, if it is disabled, keep it so.
> + */
> +
> + /* if the enable GPIO is disabled, do not enable the backlight */
> + if (pb->enable_gpio && gpiod_get_value(pb->enable_gpio) = 0)
> + return FB_BLANK_POWERDOWN;
> +
> + /* The regulator is disabled, do not enable the backlight */
> + if (!regulator_is_enabled(pb->power_supply))
> + return FB_BLANK_POWERDOWN;
> +
> + return FB_BLANK_UNBLANK;
> +}
> +
> static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct platform_pwm_backlight_data *data = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> @@ -200,7 +226,6 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct backlight_device *bl;
> struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> struct pwm_bl_data *pb;
> - int initial_blank = FB_BLANK_UNBLANK;
> struct pwm_args pargs;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -267,20 +292,13 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> pb->enable_gpio = gpio_to_desc(data->enable_gpio);
> }
>
> - if (pb->enable_gpio) {
> - /*
> - * If the driver is probed from the device tree and there is a
> - * phandle link pointing to the backlight node, it is safe to
> - * assume that another driver will enable the backlight at the
> - * appropriate time. Therefore, if it is disabled, keep it so.
> - */
> - if (node && node->phandle &&
> - gpiod_get_direction(pb->enable_gpio) = GPIOF_DIR_OUT &&
> - gpiod_get_value(pb->enable_gpio) = 0)
> - initial_blank = FB_BLANK_POWERDOWN;
> - else
> - gpiod_direction_output(pb->enable_gpio, 1);
> - }
> + /*
> + * If the GPIO is configured as input, change the direction to output
> + * and set the GPIO as active.
> + */
> + if (pb->enable_gpio &&
> + gpiod_get_direction(pb->enable_gpio) = GPIOF_DIR_IN)
> + gpiod_direction_output(pb->enable_gpio, 1);
>
> pb->power_supply = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "power");
> if (IS_ERR(pb->power_supply)) {
> @@ -288,9 +306,6 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto err_alloc;
> }
>
> - if (node && node->phandle && !regulator_is_enabled(pb->power_supply))
> - initial_blank = FB_BLANK_POWERDOWN;
> -
> pb->pwm = devm_pwm_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> if (IS_ERR(pb->pwm) && PTR_ERR(pb->pwm) != -EPROBE_DEFER && !node) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to request PWM, trying legacy API\n");
> @@ -347,7 +362,7 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> bl->props.brightness = data->dft_brightness;
> - bl->props.power = initial_blank;
> + bl->props.power = pwm_backlight_initial_power_state(pb);
> backlight_update_status(bl);
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, bl);
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Cc: thierry.reding@gmail.com, tomi.valkeinen@ti.com,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, p.zabel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] backlight: pwm_bl: Move the checks for initial power state to a separate function
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 14:49:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161118144929.GD2301@dell.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161101125933.11168-2-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Thierry, Jingoo,
Please have your say.
> Move the checks to select the initial state for the backlight to a new
> function and document the checks we are doing.
>
> With the separate function it is going to be easier to fix or improve the
> initial power state configuration later and it is easier to read the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> index 12614006211e..4b07da278b4f 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> @@ -192,6 +192,32 @@ static int pwm_backlight_parse_dt(struct device *dev,
> }
> #endif
>
> +static int pwm_backlight_initial_power_state(const struct pwm_bl_data *pb)
> +{
> + struct device_node *node = pb->dev->of_node;
> +
> + /* Not booted with device tree or no phandle link to the node */
> + if (!node || !node->phandle)
> + return FB_BLANK_UNBLANK;
> +
> + /*
> + * If the driver is probed from the device tree and there is a
> + * phandle link pointing to the backlight node, it is safe to
> + * assume that another driver will enable the backlight at the
> + * appropriate time. Therefore, if it is disabled, keep it so.
> + */
> +
> + /* if the enable GPIO is disabled, do not enable the backlight */
> + if (pb->enable_gpio && gpiod_get_value(pb->enable_gpio) == 0)
> + return FB_BLANK_POWERDOWN;
> +
> + /* The regulator is disabled, do not enable the backlight */
> + if (!regulator_is_enabled(pb->power_supply))
> + return FB_BLANK_POWERDOWN;
> +
> + return FB_BLANK_UNBLANK;
> +}
> +
> static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct platform_pwm_backlight_data *data = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> @@ -200,7 +226,6 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct backlight_device *bl;
> struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> struct pwm_bl_data *pb;
> - int initial_blank = FB_BLANK_UNBLANK;
> struct pwm_args pargs;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -267,20 +292,13 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> pb->enable_gpio = gpio_to_desc(data->enable_gpio);
> }
>
> - if (pb->enable_gpio) {
> - /*
> - * If the driver is probed from the device tree and there is a
> - * phandle link pointing to the backlight node, it is safe to
> - * assume that another driver will enable the backlight at the
> - * appropriate time. Therefore, if it is disabled, keep it so.
> - */
> - if (node && node->phandle &&
> - gpiod_get_direction(pb->enable_gpio) == GPIOF_DIR_OUT &&
> - gpiod_get_value(pb->enable_gpio) == 0)
> - initial_blank = FB_BLANK_POWERDOWN;
> - else
> - gpiod_direction_output(pb->enable_gpio, 1);
> - }
> + /*
> + * If the GPIO is configured as input, change the direction to output
> + * and set the GPIO as active.
> + */
> + if (pb->enable_gpio &&
> + gpiod_get_direction(pb->enable_gpio) == GPIOF_DIR_IN)
> + gpiod_direction_output(pb->enable_gpio, 1);
>
> pb->power_supply = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "power");
> if (IS_ERR(pb->power_supply)) {
> @@ -288,9 +306,6 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto err_alloc;
> }
>
> - if (node && node->phandle && !regulator_is_enabled(pb->power_supply))
> - initial_blank = FB_BLANK_POWERDOWN;
> -
> pb->pwm = devm_pwm_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> if (IS_ERR(pb->pwm) && PTR_ERR(pb->pwm) != -EPROBE_DEFER && !node) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to request PWM, trying legacy API\n");
> @@ -347,7 +362,7 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> bl->props.brightness = data->dft_brightness;
> - bl->props.power = initial_blank;
> + bl->props.power = pwm_backlight_initial_power_state(pb);
> backlight_update_status(bl);
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, bl);
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-18 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-01 12:59 [PATCH v3 0/2] backlight: pwm_bl: Fix the initial power state selection Peter Ujfalusi
2016-11-01 12:59 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-11-01 12:59 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-11-01 12:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] backlight: pwm_bl: Move the checks for initial power state to a separate function Peter Ujfalusi
2016-11-01 12:59 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-11-01 12:59 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-11-01 13:10 ` Philipp Zabel
2016-11-01 13:10 ` Philipp Zabel
2016-11-18 14:49 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2016-11-18 14:49 ` Lee Jones
2016-11-21 8:10 ` Thierry Reding
2016-11-21 8:10 ` Thierry Reding
2016-11-22 13:33 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-11-22 13:33 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-11-22 13:33 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-11-01 12:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] backlight: pwm_bl: Check the pwm state for initial backlight power state Peter Ujfalusi
2016-11-01 12:59 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-11-01 12:59 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-11-01 13:11 ` Philipp Zabel
2016-11-01 13:11 ` Philipp Zabel
2016-11-21 8:13 ` Thierry Reding
2016-11-21 8:13 ` Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161118144929.GD2301@dell.home \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.