From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, kernel@pengutronix.de,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] mtd: nand: mxc: implement onfi get/set features
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 12:03:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161122120312.73551075@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161122105253.tzz2hvzhkse7telr@pengutronix.de>
On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:52:53 +0100
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 02:56:43PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Hi Sascha,
> >
> > On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 10:32:52 +0200
> > Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> >
> > > To be able to support different ONFI timing modes we have to implement
> > > the onfi_set_features and onfi_get_features. Tested on an i.MX25 SoC.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand.c
> > > index 5173fad..1db8299 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand.c
> > > @@ -1239,6 +1239,57 @@ static void mxc_nand_command(struct mtd_info *mtd, unsigned command,
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static int mxc_nand_onfi_set_features(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
> > > + int addr, uint8_t *subfeature_param)
> > > +{
> > > + struct nand_chip *nand_chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
> > > + struct mxc_nand_host *host = nand_get_controller_data(nand_chip);
> > > + int i;
> > > +
> > > + if (!chip->onfi_version ||
> > > + !(le16_to_cpu(chip->onfi_params.opt_cmd)
> > > + & ONFI_OPT_CMD_SET_GET_FEATURES))
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + host->buf_start = 0;
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < ONFI_SUBFEATURE_PARAM_LEN; ++i)
> > > + chip->write_byte(mtd, subfeature_param[i]);
> > > +
> > > + memcpy32_toio(host->main_area0, host->data_buf, mtd->writesize);
> > > + host->devtype_data->send_cmd(host, NAND_CMD_SET_FEATURES, false);
> > > + mxc_do_addr_cycle(mtd, addr, -1);
> > > + host->devtype_data->send_page(mtd, NFC_INPUT);
> >
> > I've been working with an mx27 board embedding a NAND device lately,
> > and had a closer look at the NAND controller IP.
> > With this IP, you're not able to send only 4 bytes of data, and I'm
> > sure sure what you're doing here (sending a full page of data) works
> > for a SET_FEATURE command.
> >
> > Do you have a way to test it (my NAND is not ONFI compliant)? By test
> > it, I mean, set a timing mode using SET_FEATURE and check if the new
> > mode has been applied using GET_FEATURE.
>
> I have an i.MX27 board with ONFI flash, but this one does not have the
> ONFI_OPT_CMD_SET_GET_FEATURES bit set, so I can't test it there.
> However, I can confirm that it works on an i.MX25. With the attached
> patch applied on vanilla v4.9-rc5 I get:
>
> GET FEATURES. chip->onfi_timing_mode_default: 4
> timing before: 0x00
> timing after: 0x04
Okay, cool. I guess most NANDs are more tolerant than what's strictly
required in the ONFI spec.
Thanks for testing.
Boris
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com (Boris Brezillon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 8/9] mtd: nand: mxc: implement onfi get/set features
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 12:03:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161122120312.73551075@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161122105253.tzz2hvzhkse7telr@pengutronix.de>
On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:52:53 +0100
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 02:56:43PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Hi Sascha,
> >
> > On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 10:32:52 +0200
> > Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> >
> > > To be able to support different ONFI timing modes we have to implement
> > > the onfi_set_features and onfi_get_features. Tested on an i.MX25 SoC.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand.c
> > > index 5173fad..1db8299 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand.c
> > > @@ -1239,6 +1239,57 @@ static void mxc_nand_command(struct mtd_info *mtd, unsigned command,
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static int mxc_nand_onfi_set_features(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
> > > + int addr, uint8_t *subfeature_param)
> > > +{
> > > + struct nand_chip *nand_chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
> > > + struct mxc_nand_host *host = nand_get_controller_data(nand_chip);
> > > + int i;
> > > +
> > > + if (!chip->onfi_version ||
> > > + !(le16_to_cpu(chip->onfi_params.opt_cmd)
> > > + & ONFI_OPT_CMD_SET_GET_FEATURES))
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + host->buf_start = 0;
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < ONFI_SUBFEATURE_PARAM_LEN; ++i)
> > > + chip->write_byte(mtd, subfeature_param[i]);
> > > +
> > > + memcpy32_toio(host->main_area0, host->data_buf, mtd->writesize);
> > > + host->devtype_data->send_cmd(host, NAND_CMD_SET_FEATURES, false);
> > > + mxc_do_addr_cycle(mtd, addr, -1);
> > > + host->devtype_data->send_page(mtd, NFC_INPUT);
> >
> > I've been working with an mx27 board embedding a NAND device lately,
> > and had a closer look at the NAND controller IP.
> > With this IP, you're not able to send only 4 bytes of data, and I'm
> > sure sure what you're doing here (sending a full page of data) works
> > for a SET_FEATURE command.
> >
> > Do you have a way to test it (my NAND is not ONFI compliant)? By test
> > it, I mean, set a timing mode using SET_FEATURE and check if the new
> > mode has been applied using GET_FEATURE.
>
> I have an i.MX27 board with ONFI flash, but this one does not have the
> ONFI_OPT_CMD_SET_GET_FEATURES bit set, so I can't test it there.
> However, I can confirm that it works on an i.MX25. With the attached
> patch applied on vanilla v4.9-rc5 I get:
>
> GET FEATURES. chip->onfi_timing_mode_default: 4
> timing before: 0x00
> timing after: 0x04
Okay, cool. I guess most NANDs are more tolerant than what's strictly
required in the ONFI spec.
Thanks for testing.
Boris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-22 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-15 8:32 [PATCH v4] mtd: nand: automate NAND timings selection Sascha Hauer
2016-09-15 8:32 ` Sascha Hauer
2016-09-15 8:32 ` [PATCH 1/9] mtd: nand: Create a NAND reset function Sascha Hauer
2016-09-15 8:32 ` Sascha Hauer
2016-09-15 8:32 ` [PATCH 2/9] mtd: nand: Introduce nand_data_interface Sascha Hauer
2016-09-15 8:32 ` Sascha Hauer
2016-09-15 8:32 ` [PATCH 3/9] mtd: nand: convert ONFI mode into data interface Sascha Hauer
2016-09-15 8:32 ` Sascha Hauer
2016-09-15 8:32 ` [PATCH 4/9] mtd: nand: Add function to convert ONFI mode to data_interface Sascha Hauer
2016-09-15 8:32 ` Sascha Hauer
2016-09-15 8:32 ` [PATCH 5/9] mtd: nand: Expose data interface for ONFI mode 0 Sascha Hauer
2016-09-15 8:32 ` Sascha Hauer
2016-09-15 12:56 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-09-15 12:56 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-09 5:12 ` Brian Norris
2016-10-09 5:12 ` Brian Norris
2016-10-09 11:58 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-09 11:58 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-09-15 8:32 ` [PATCH 6/9] mtd: nand: automate NAND timings selection Sascha Hauer
2016-09-15 8:32 ` Sascha Hauer
2016-09-15 8:32 ` [PATCH 7/9] mtd: nand: sunxi: switch from manual to automated timing config Sascha Hauer
2016-09-15 8:32 ` Sascha Hauer
2016-09-15 8:32 ` [PATCH 8/9] mtd: nand: mxc: implement onfi get/set features Sascha Hauer
2016-09-15 8:32 ` Sascha Hauer
2016-11-21 13:56 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-11-21 13:56 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-11-22 10:52 ` Sascha Hauer
2016-11-22 10:52 ` Sascha Hauer
2016-11-22 11:03 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2016-11-22 11:03 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-09-15 8:32 ` [PATCH 9/9] mtd: nand: mxc: Add timing setup for v2 controllers Sascha Hauer
2016-09-15 8:32 ` Sascha Hauer
2016-09-16 12:19 ` [PATCH v4] mtd: nand: automate NAND timings selection Boris Brezillon
2016-09-16 12:19 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-09-19 6:43 ` Sascha Hauer
2016-09-19 6:43 ` Sascha Hauer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-09-09 12:05 Sascha Hauer
2016-09-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 8/9] mtd: nand: mxc: implement onfi get/set features Sascha Hauer
2016-09-09 12:05 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161122120312.73551075@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.