From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Dr David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [qemu patch V3 2/2] kvmclock: reduce kvmclock difference on migration
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 21:54:29 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161129235427.GA23961@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161129123405.GF14328@thinpad.lan.raisama.net>
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:34:05AM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 08:56:00AM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 03:12:01PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 02:45:24PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:13:22PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > > > Sorry for not noticing the following issues on the previous
> > > > > reviews. I was only paying attention to the vmstate and machine
> > > > > code:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 08:50:04AM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > > > > Check for KVM_CAP_ADJUST_CLOCK capability KVM_CLOCK_TSC_STABLE, which
> > > > > > indicates that KVM_GET_CLOCK returns a value as seen by the guest at
> > > > > > that moment.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For new machine types, use this value rather than reading
> > > > > > from guest memory.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This reduces kvmclock difference on migration from 5s to 0.1s
> > > > > > (when max_downtime == 5s).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > hw/i386/kvm/clock.c | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > > > > > include/hw/i386/pc.h | 5 ++
> > > > > > target-i386/kvm.c | 7 +++
> > > > > > target-i386/kvm_i386.h | 1
> > > > > > 4 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > v2:
> > > > > > - improve variable names (Juan)
> > > > > > - consolidate code on kvm_get_clock function (Paolo)
> > > > > > - return mach_use_reliable_get_clock from needed function (Paolo)
> > > > > > v3:
> > > > > > - simplify check for src_use_reliable_get_clock (Eduardo)
> > > > > > - move src_use_reliable_get_clock initialization to realize (Eduardo)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Index: qemu-mig-advance-clock/hw/i386/kvm/clock.c
> > > > > > ===================================================================
> > > > > > --- qemu-mig-advance-clock.orig/hw/i386/kvm/clock.c 2016-11-17 15:07:11.220632761 -0200
> > > > > > +++ qemu-mig-advance-clock/hw/i386/kvm/clock.c 2016-11-17 15:11:51.372048640 -0200
> > > > > > @@ -36,6 +36,12 @@
> > > > > >
> > > > > > uint64_t clock;
> > > > > > bool clock_valid;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + /* whether machine supports reliable KVM_GET_CLOCK */
> > > > > > + bool mach_use_reliable_get_clock;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + /* whether source host supported reliable KVM_GET_CLOCK */
> > > > > > + bool src_use_reliable_get_clock;
> > > > > > } KVMClockState;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info {
> > > > > > @@ -81,6 +87,19 @@
> > > > > > return nsec + time.system_time;
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +static uint64_t kvm_get_clock(void)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + struct kvm_clock_data data;
> > > > > > + int ret;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + ret = kvm_vm_ioctl(kvm_state, KVM_GET_CLOCK, &data);
> > > > > > + if (ret < 0) {
> > > > > > + fprintf(stderr, "KVM_GET_CLOCK failed: %s\n", strerror(ret));
> > > > > > + abort();
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > + return data.clock;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > static void kvmclock_vm_state_change(void *opaque, int running,
> > > > > > RunState state)
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > @@ -91,15 +110,36 @@
> > > > >
> > > > > Can you please use "diff -p" on your patches?
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > if (running) {
> > > > > > struct kvm_clock_data data = {};
> > > > > > - uint64_t time_at_migration = kvmclock_current_nsec(s);
> > > > > > + uint64_t pvclock_via_mem = 0;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - s->clock_valid = false;
> > > > > > + /* local (running VM) restore */
> > > > > > + if (s->clock_valid) {
> > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > + * if host does not support reliable KVM_GET_CLOCK,
> > > > > > + * read kvmclock value from memory
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > + if (!kvm_has_adjust_clock_stable()) {
> > > > >
> > > > > Why not use src_use_reliable_get_clock here, too? (Maybe rename
> > > > > it to simply clock_is_reliable?)
> > > >
> > > > Because you end up mixing two mental ideas (one: whether the source
> > > > has KVM_GET_CLOCK, second: whether the destination has KVM_GET_CLOCK
> > > > into one variable). I find it more confusing than not.
> > > > Maybe its just my limited brain but i find it
> > > > confusing.
> > >
> > > I find it simpler and easier to reason about.
> >
> > I disagree, but i don't mind. Is this what you refer to:
> >
> > Index: qemu-mig-advance-clock/hw/i386/kvm/clock.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- qemu-mig-advance-clock.orig/hw/i386/kvm/clock.c 2016-11-17 15:11:51.372048640 -0200
> > +++ qemu-mig-advance-clock/hw/i386/kvm/clock.c 2016-11-29 08:53:20.609817026 -0200
> > @@ -37,11 +37,11 @@
> > uint64_t clock;
> > bool clock_valid;
> >
> > - /* whether machine supports reliable KVM_GET_CLOCK */
> > + /* whether machine type supports reliable get clock */
> > bool mach_use_reliable_get_clock;
> >
> > - /* whether source host supported reliable KVM_GET_CLOCK */
> > - bool src_use_reliable_get_clock;
> > + /* whether clock is reliable */
>
> I would make the comment more explicit about its meaning:
> /* whether the 'clock' value was obtained in a host with
> * reliable KVM_GET_CLOCK */
Done.
> > + bool clock_is_reliable;
>
> } KVMClockState;
> >
> > struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info {
> > @@ -112,25 +112,17 @@
> > struct kvm_clock_data data = {};
> > uint64_t pvclock_via_mem = 0;
> >
> > - /* local (running VM) restore */
> > - if (s->clock_valid) {
> > - /*
> > - * if host does not support reliable KVM_GET_CLOCK,
> > - * read kvmclock value from memory
> > - */
> > - if (!kvm_has_adjust_clock_stable()) {
> > - pvclock_via_mem = kvmclock_current_nsec(s);
> > - }
> > - /* migration/savevm/init restore */
> > - } else {
> > - /*
> > - * use s->clock in case machine uses reliable
> > - * get clock and source host supported
> > - * reliable get clock
> > - */
> > - if (!s->src_use_reliable_get_clock) {
> > - pvclock_via_mem = kvmclock_current_nsec(s);
> > - }
> > +
>
> A comment here would be welcome. Something like: "If the host
> where s->clock was read did not support reliable KVM_GET_CLOCK,
> read kvmclock value from memory".
Done.
> > + if (!s->clock_is_reliable) {
> > + pvclock_via_mem = kvmclock_current_nsec(s);
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* migration/savevm/init restore
> > + * update clock_is_reliable to match local
> > + * host capabilities.
> > + */
> > + if (s->clock_valid == false) {
>
> Why the s->clock_valid check? It seems unnecessary.
Because if s->clock_valid == false (from migration),
kvm_has_adjust_clock_stable() from the local host is irrelevant.
If s->clock_valid == true, kvm_has_adjust_clock_stable() is
what decides whether to use KVM_GET_CLOCK or not.
> (If this is an optimization to avoid extra ioctl() calls, you can
> cache it inside kvm_has_adjust_clock_stable()).
Its not.
> > + s->clock_is_reliable = kvm_has_adjust_clock_stable();
> > }
>
> This should go to kvm_get_clock(), so s->clock and
> s->clock_is_reliable are guaranteed to be always in sync.
No: the point to change clock_is_reliable is the following: whether
its the first read of the clock (migration), or subsequent
reads (normal machine operation).
Now kvm_get_clock() just reads the clock, so i don't see it as
the right place to change the variable.
Agreed?
> > /* We can't rely on the saved clock value, just discard it */
> > @@ -181,20 +173,14 @@
> > {
> > KVMClockState *s = KVM_CLOCK(dev);
> >
> > - /*
> > - * On machine types that support reliable KVM_GET_CLOCK,
> > - * if host kernel does provide reliable KVM_GET_CLOCK,
> > - * set src_use_reliable_get_clock=true so that destination
> > - * avoids reading kvmclock from memory.
> > - */
> > - if (s->mach_use_reliable_get_clock && kvm_has_adjust_clock_stable()) {
> > - s->src_use_reliable_get_clock = true;
> > + if (kvm_has_adjust_clock_stable()) {
> > + s->clock_is_reliable = true;
> > }
> >
> > qemu_add_vm_change_state_handler(kvmclock_vm_state_change, s);
> > }
> >
> > -static bool kvmclock_src_use_reliable_get_clock(void *opaque)
> > +static bool kvmclock_clock_is_reliable_needed(void *opaque)
> > {
> > KVMClockState *s = opaque;
> >
> > @@ -202,12 +188,12 @@
> > }
> >
> > static const VMStateDescription kvmclock_reliable_get_clock = {
> > - .name = "kvmclock/src_use_reliable_get_clock",
> > + .name = "kvmclock/clock_is_reliable",
> > .version_id = 1,
> > .minimum_version_id = 1,
> > - .needed = kvmclock_src_use_reliable_get_clock,
> > + .needed = kvmclock_clock_is_reliable_needed,
> > .fields = (VMStateField[]) {
> > - VMSTATE_BOOL(src_use_reliable_get_clock, KVMClockState),
> > + VMSTATE_BOOL(clock_is_reliable, KVMClockState),
> > VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
> > }
> > };
>
> --
> Eduardo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Dr David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [qemu patch V3 2/2] kvmclock: reduce kvmclock difference on migration
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 21:54:29 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161129235427.GA23961@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161129123405.GF14328@thinpad.lan.raisama.net>
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:34:05AM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 08:56:00AM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 03:12:01PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 02:45:24PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:13:22PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > > > Sorry for not noticing the following issues on the previous
> > > > > reviews. I was only paying attention to the vmstate and machine
> > > > > code:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 08:50:04AM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > > > > Check for KVM_CAP_ADJUST_CLOCK capability KVM_CLOCK_TSC_STABLE, which
> > > > > > indicates that KVM_GET_CLOCK returns a value as seen by the guest at
> > > > > > that moment.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For new machine types, use this value rather than reading
> > > > > > from guest memory.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This reduces kvmclock difference on migration from 5s to 0.1s
> > > > > > (when max_downtime == 5s).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > hw/i386/kvm/clock.c | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > > > > > include/hw/i386/pc.h | 5 ++
> > > > > > target-i386/kvm.c | 7 +++
> > > > > > target-i386/kvm_i386.h | 1
> > > > > > 4 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > v2:
> > > > > > - improve variable names (Juan)
> > > > > > - consolidate code on kvm_get_clock function (Paolo)
> > > > > > - return mach_use_reliable_get_clock from needed function (Paolo)
> > > > > > v3:
> > > > > > - simplify check for src_use_reliable_get_clock (Eduardo)
> > > > > > - move src_use_reliable_get_clock initialization to realize (Eduardo)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Index: qemu-mig-advance-clock/hw/i386/kvm/clock.c
> > > > > > ===================================================================
> > > > > > --- qemu-mig-advance-clock.orig/hw/i386/kvm/clock.c 2016-11-17 15:07:11.220632761 -0200
> > > > > > +++ qemu-mig-advance-clock/hw/i386/kvm/clock.c 2016-11-17 15:11:51.372048640 -0200
> > > > > > @@ -36,6 +36,12 @@
> > > > > >
> > > > > > uint64_t clock;
> > > > > > bool clock_valid;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + /* whether machine supports reliable KVM_GET_CLOCK */
> > > > > > + bool mach_use_reliable_get_clock;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + /* whether source host supported reliable KVM_GET_CLOCK */
> > > > > > + bool src_use_reliable_get_clock;
> > > > > > } KVMClockState;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info {
> > > > > > @@ -81,6 +87,19 @@
> > > > > > return nsec + time.system_time;
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +static uint64_t kvm_get_clock(void)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + struct kvm_clock_data data;
> > > > > > + int ret;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + ret = kvm_vm_ioctl(kvm_state, KVM_GET_CLOCK, &data);
> > > > > > + if (ret < 0) {
> > > > > > + fprintf(stderr, "KVM_GET_CLOCK failed: %s\n", strerror(ret));
> > > > > > + abort();
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > + return data.clock;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > static void kvmclock_vm_state_change(void *opaque, int running,
> > > > > > RunState state)
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > @@ -91,15 +110,36 @@
> > > > >
> > > > > Can you please use "diff -p" on your patches?
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > if (running) {
> > > > > > struct kvm_clock_data data = {};
> > > > > > - uint64_t time_at_migration = kvmclock_current_nsec(s);
> > > > > > + uint64_t pvclock_via_mem = 0;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - s->clock_valid = false;
> > > > > > + /* local (running VM) restore */
> > > > > > + if (s->clock_valid) {
> > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > + * if host does not support reliable KVM_GET_CLOCK,
> > > > > > + * read kvmclock value from memory
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > + if (!kvm_has_adjust_clock_stable()) {
> > > > >
> > > > > Why not use src_use_reliable_get_clock here, too? (Maybe rename
> > > > > it to simply clock_is_reliable?)
> > > >
> > > > Because you end up mixing two mental ideas (one: whether the source
> > > > has KVM_GET_CLOCK, second: whether the destination has KVM_GET_CLOCK
> > > > into one variable). I find it more confusing than not.
> > > > Maybe its just my limited brain but i find it
> > > > confusing.
> > >
> > > I find it simpler and easier to reason about.
> >
> > I disagree, but i don't mind. Is this what you refer to:
> >
> > Index: qemu-mig-advance-clock/hw/i386/kvm/clock.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- qemu-mig-advance-clock.orig/hw/i386/kvm/clock.c 2016-11-17 15:11:51.372048640 -0200
> > +++ qemu-mig-advance-clock/hw/i386/kvm/clock.c 2016-11-29 08:53:20.609817026 -0200
> > @@ -37,11 +37,11 @@
> > uint64_t clock;
> > bool clock_valid;
> >
> > - /* whether machine supports reliable KVM_GET_CLOCK */
> > + /* whether machine type supports reliable get clock */
> > bool mach_use_reliable_get_clock;
> >
> > - /* whether source host supported reliable KVM_GET_CLOCK */
> > - bool src_use_reliable_get_clock;
> > + /* whether clock is reliable */
>
> I would make the comment more explicit about its meaning:
> /* whether the 'clock' value was obtained in a host with
> * reliable KVM_GET_CLOCK */
Done.
> > + bool clock_is_reliable;
>
> } KVMClockState;
> >
> > struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info {
> > @@ -112,25 +112,17 @@
> > struct kvm_clock_data data = {};
> > uint64_t pvclock_via_mem = 0;
> >
> > - /* local (running VM) restore */
> > - if (s->clock_valid) {
> > - /*
> > - * if host does not support reliable KVM_GET_CLOCK,
> > - * read kvmclock value from memory
> > - */
> > - if (!kvm_has_adjust_clock_stable()) {
> > - pvclock_via_mem = kvmclock_current_nsec(s);
> > - }
> > - /* migration/savevm/init restore */
> > - } else {
> > - /*
> > - * use s->clock in case machine uses reliable
> > - * get clock and source host supported
> > - * reliable get clock
> > - */
> > - if (!s->src_use_reliable_get_clock) {
> > - pvclock_via_mem = kvmclock_current_nsec(s);
> > - }
> > +
>
> A comment here would be welcome. Something like: "If the host
> where s->clock was read did not support reliable KVM_GET_CLOCK,
> read kvmclock value from memory".
Done.
> > + if (!s->clock_is_reliable) {
> > + pvclock_via_mem = kvmclock_current_nsec(s);
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* migration/savevm/init restore
> > + * update clock_is_reliable to match local
> > + * host capabilities.
> > + */
> > + if (s->clock_valid == false) {
>
> Why the s->clock_valid check? It seems unnecessary.
Because if s->clock_valid == false (from migration),
kvm_has_adjust_clock_stable() from the local host is irrelevant.
If s->clock_valid == true, kvm_has_adjust_clock_stable() is
what decides whether to use KVM_GET_CLOCK or not.
> (If this is an optimization to avoid extra ioctl() calls, you can
> cache it inside kvm_has_adjust_clock_stable()).
Its not.
> > + s->clock_is_reliable = kvm_has_adjust_clock_stable();
> > }
>
> This should go to kvm_get_clock(), so s->clock and
> s->clock_is_reliable are guaranteed to be always in sync.
No: the point to change clock_is_reliable is the following: whether
its the first read of the clock (migration), or subsequent
reads (normal machine operation).
Now kvm_get_clock() just reads the clock, so i don't see it as
the right place to change the variable.
Agreed?
> > /* We can't rely on the saved clock value, just discard it */
> > @@ -181,20 +173,14 @@
> > {
> > KVMClockState *s = KVM_CLOCK(dev);
> >
> > - /*
> > - * On machine types that support reliable KVM_GET_CLOCK,
> > - * if host kernel does provide reliable KVM_GET_CLOCK,
> > - * set src_use_reliable_get_clock=true so that destination
> > - * avoids reading kvmclock from memory.
> > - */
> > - if (s->mach_use_reliable_get_clock && kvm_has_adjust_clock_stable()) {
> > - s->src_use_reliable_get_clock = true;
> > + if (kvm_has_adjust_clock_stable()) {
> > + s->clock_is_reliable = true;
> > }
> >
> > qemu_add_vm_change_state_handler(kvmclock_vm_state_change, s);
> > }
> >
> > -static bool kvmclock_src_use_reliable_get_clock(void *opaque)
> > +static bool kvmclock_clock_is_reliable_needed(void *opaque)
> > {
> > KVMClockState *s = opaque;
> >
> > @@ -202,12 +188,12 @@
> > }
> >
> > static const VMStateDescription kvmclock_reliable_get_clock = {
> > - .name = "kvmclock/src_use_reliable_get_clock",
> > + .name = "kvmclock/clock_is_reliable",
> > .version_id = 1,
> > .minimum_version_id = 1,
> > - .needed = kvmclock_src_use_reliable_get_clock,
> > + .needed = kvmclock_clock_is_reliable_needed,
> > .fields = (VMStateField[]) {
> > - VMSTATE_BOOL(src_use_reliable_get_clock, KVMClockState),
> > + VMSTATE_BOOL(clock_is_reliable, KVMClockState),
> > VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
> > }
> > };
>
> --
> Eduardo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-29 23:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-21 10:50 [qemu patch V3 0/2] improve kvmclock difference on migration Marcelo Tosatti
2016-11-21 10:50 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2016-11-21 10:50 ` [qemu patch V3 1/2] kvm: sync linux headers Marcelo Tosatti
2016-11-21 10:50 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2016-11-21 10:50 ` [qemu patch V3 2/2] kvmclock: reduce kvmclock difference on migration Marcelo Tosatti
2016-11-21 10:50 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2016-11-28 14:13 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-11-28 14:13 ` [Qemu-devel] " Eduardo Habkost
2016-11-28 16:45 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2016-11-28 16:45 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2016-11-28 17:12 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-11-28 17:12 ` [Qemu-devel] " Eduardo Habkost
2016-11-28 17:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-28 17:31 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-29 10:56 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2016-11-29 10:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2016-11-29 12:34 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-11-29 12:34 ` [Qemu-devel] " Eduardo Habkost
2016-11-29 23:54 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2016-11-29 23:54 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2016-11-30 13:09 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-11-30 13:09 ` [Qemu-devel] " Eduardo Habkost
2016-12-01 14:39 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2016-12-01 14:39 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2016-12-02 13:56 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-12-02 13:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Eduardo Habkost
2016-12-02 22:30 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2016-12-02 22:30 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2016-12-05 15:17 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-12-05 15:17 ` [Qemu-devel] " Eduardo Habkost
2016-12-05 17:20 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2016-12-05 17:20 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2016-12-06 0:47 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-12-06 0:47 ` [Qemu-devel] " Eduardo Habkost
2016-11-28 12:16 ` [qemu patch V3 0/2] improve " Marcelo Tosatti
2016-11-28 12:16 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161129235427.GA23961@amt.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.