From: mhocko@suse.com (Michal Hocko)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/6] mm: hugetlb: add a new parameter for some functions
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 14:52:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161202135229.GJ6830@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1479107259-2011-3-git-send-email-shijie.huang@arm.com>
On Mon 14-11-16 15:07:35, Huang Shijie wrote:
> This patch adds a new parameter, the "no_init", for these functions:
> alloc_fresh_gigantic_page_node()
> alloc_fresh_gigantic_page()
>
> The prep_new_huge_page() does some initialization for the new page.
> But sometime, we do not need it to do so, such as in the surplus case
> in later patch.
>
> With this parameter, the prep_new_huge_page() can be called by needed:
> If the "no_init" is false, calls the prep_new_huge_page() in
> the alloc_fresh_gigantic_page_node();
This double negative just makes my head spin. I haven't got to later
patch to understand the motivation but if anything bool do_prep would
be much more clear. In general doing these "init if a parameter is
specified" is a bad idea. It just makes the code more convoluted and
sutble. If you need the separation then __foo vs foo with the first
doing the real work and the later some additional initialization on top
sounds like a better idea to me.
Let's see what other changes are about.
> This patch makes preparation for the later patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <shijie.huang@arm.com>
> ---
> mm/hugetlb.c | 15 +++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 496b703..db0177b 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -1127,27 +1127,29 @@ static struct page *alloc_gigantic_page(int nid, unsigned int order)
> static void prep_new_huge_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page, int nid);
> static void prep_compound_gigantic_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order);
>
> -static struct page *alloc_fresh_gigantic_page_node(struct hstate *h, int nid)
> +static struct page *alloc_fresh_gigantic_page_node(struct hstate *h,
> + int nid, bool no_init)
> {
> struct page *page;
>
> page = alloc_gigantic_page(nid, huge_page_order(h));
> if (page) {
> prep_compound_gigantic_page(page, huge_page_order(h));
> - prep_new_huge_page(h, page, nid);
> + if (!no_init)
> + prep_new_huge_page(h, page, nid);
> }
>
> return page;
> }
>
> static int alloc_fresh_gigantic_page(struct hstate *h,
> - nodemask_t *nodes_allowed)
> + nodemask_t *nodes_allowed, bool no_init)
> {
> struct page *page = NULL;
> int nr_nodes, node;
>
> for_each_node_mask_to_alloc(h, nr_nodes, node, nodes_allowed) {
> - page = alloc_fresh_gigantic_page_node(h, node);
> + page = alloc_fresh_gigantic_page_node(h, node, no_init);
> if (page)
> return 1;
> }
> @@ -1166,7 +1168,7 @@ static inline void free_gigantic_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order) { }
> static inline void destroy_compound_gigantic_page(struct page *page,
> unsigned int order) { }
> static inline int alloc_fresh_gigantic_page(struct hstate *h,
> - nodemask_t *nodes_allowed) { return 0; }
> + nodemask_t *nodes_allowed, bool no_init) { return 0; }
> #endif
>
> static void update_and_free_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page)
> @@ -2313,7 +2315,8 @@ static unsigned long set_max_huge_pages(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count,
> cond_resched();
>
> if (hstate_is_gigantic(h))
> - ret = alloc_fresh_gigantic_page(h, nodes_allowed);
> + ret = alloc_fresh_gigantic_page(h, nodes_allowed,
> + false);
> else
> ret = alloc_fresh_huge_page(h, nodes_allowed);
> spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> --
> 2.5.5
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Huang Shijie <shijie.huang@arm.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com,
mike.kravetz@oracle.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
steve.capper@arm.com, kaly.xin@arm.com, nd@arm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] mm: hugetlb: add a new parameter for some functions
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 14:52:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161202135229.GJ6830@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1479107259-2011-3-git-send-email-shijie.huang@arm.com>
On Mon 14-11-16 15:07:35, Huang Shijie wrote:
> This patch adds a new parameter, the "no_init", for these functions:
> alloc_fresh_gigantic_page_node()
> alloc_fresh_gigantic_page()
>
> The prep_new_huge_page() does some initialization for the new page.
> But sometime, we do not need it to do so, such as in the surplus case
> in later patch.
>
> With this parameter, the prep_new_huge_page() can be called by needed:
> If the "no_init" is false, calls the prep_new_huge_page() in
> the alloc_fresh_gigantic_page_node();
This double negative just makes my head spin. I haven't got to later
patch to understand the motivation but if anything bool do_prep would
be much more clear. In general doing these "init if a parameter is
specified" is a bad idea. It just makes the code more convoluted and
sutble. If you need the separation then __foo vs foo with the first
doing the real work and the later some additional initialization on top
sounds like a better idea to me.
Let's see what other changes are about.
> This patch makes preparation for the later patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <shijie.huang@arm.com>
> ---
> mm/hugetlb.c | 15 +++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 496b703..db0177b 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -1127,27 +1127,29 @@ static struct page *alloc_gigantic_page(int nid, unsigned int order)
> static void prep_new_huge_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page, int nid);
> static void prep_compound_gigantic_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order);
>
> -static struct page *alloc_fresh_gigantic_page_node(struct hstate *h, int nid)
> +static struct page *alloc_fresh_gigantic_page_node(struct hstate *h,
> + int nid, bool no_init)
> {
> struct page *page;
>
> page = alloc_gigantic_page(nid, huge_page_order(h));
> if (page) {
> prep_compound_gigantic_page(page, huge_page_order(h));
> - prep_new_huge_page(h, page, nid);
> + if (!no_init)
> + prep_new_huge_page(h, page, nid);
> }
>
> return page;
> }
>
> static int alloc_fresh_gigantic_page(struct hstate *h,
> - nodemask_t *nodes_allowed)
> + nodemask_t *nodes_allowed, bool no_init)
> {
> struct page *page = NULL;
> int nr_nodes, node;
>
> for_each_node_mask_to_alloc(h, nr_nodes, node, nodes_allowed) {
> - page = alloc_fresh_gigantic_page_node(h, node);
> + page = alloc_fresh_gigantic_page_node(h, node, no_init);
> if (page)
> return 1;
> }
> @@ -1166,7 +1168,7 @@ static inline void free_gigantic_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order) { }
> static inline void destroy_compound_gigantic_page(struct page *page,
> unsigned int order) { }
> static inline int alloc_fresh_gigantic_page(struct hstate *h,
> - nodemask_t *nodes_allowed) { return 0; }
> + nodemask_t *nodes_allowed, bool no_init) { return 0; }
> #endif
>
> static void update_and_free_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page)
> @@ -2313,7 +2315,8 @@ static unsigned long set_max_huge_pages(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count,
> cond_resched();
>
> if (hstate_is_gigantic(h))
> - ret = alloc_fresh_gigantic_page(h, nodes_allowed);
> + ret = alloc_fresh_gigantic_page(h, nodes_allowed,
> + false);
> else
> ret = alloc_fresh_huge_page(h, nodes_allowed);
> spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> --
> 2.5.5
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-02 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-14 7:07 [PATCH v2 0/6] mm: fix the "counter.sh" failure for libhugetlbfs Huang Shijie
2016-11-14 7:07 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-14 7:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] mm: hugetlb: rename some allocation functions Huang Shijie
2016-11-14 7:07 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-28 13:29 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-11-28 13:29 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-11-29 8:53 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-29 8:53 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-29 10:44 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-11-29 10:44 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-11-30 3:03 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-30 3:03 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-14 7:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] mm: hugetlb: add a new parameter for some functions Huang Shijie
2016-11-14 7:07 ` Huang Shijie
2016-12-02 13:52 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2016-12-02 13:52 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-05 3:05 ` Huang Shijie
2016-12-05 3:05 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-14 7:07 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] mm: hugetlb: change the return type for alloc_fresh_gigantic_page Huang Shijie
2016-11-14 7:07 ` Huang Shijie
2016-12-02 13:56 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-02 13:56 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-05 3:06 ` Huang Shijie
2016-12-05 3:06 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-14 7:07 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] mm: mempolicy: intruduce a helper huge_nodemask() Huang Shijie
2016-11-14 7:07 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-15 6:01 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-11-15 6:01 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-11-15 8:20 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-15 8:20 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-15 8:52 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-15 8:52 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-16 6:53 ` [PATCH V2 fix " Huang Shijie
2016-11-16 6:53 ` Huang Shijie
2016-12-02 13:58 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-02 13:58 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-05 3:09 ` Huang Shijie
2016-12-05 3:09 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-14 7:07 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] mm: hugetlb: add a new function to allocate a new gigantic page Huang Shijie
2016-11-14 7:07 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-16 6:55 ` [PATCH V2 fix " Huang Shijie
2016-11-16 6:55 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-28 14:17 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-11-28 14:17 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-11-29 9:03 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-29 9:03 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-29 10:50 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-11-29 10:50 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-11-30 3:02 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-30 3:02 ` Huang Shijie
2016-12-02 14:03 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-02 14:03 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-05 3:15 ` Huang Shijie
2016-12-05 3:15 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-14 7:07 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] mm: hugetlb: support gigantic surplus pages Huang Shijie
2016-11-14 7:07 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-14 22:44 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] mm: fix the "counter.sh" failure for libhugetlbfs Andrew Morton
2016-11-14 22:44 ` Andrew Morton
2016-11-15 2:36 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-15 2:36 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-28 14:20 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-11-28 14:20 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-11-29 9:07 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-29 9:07 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-30 6:30 ` [PATCH extra ] mm: hugetlb: add description for alloc_gigantic_page() Huang Shijie
2016-11-30 6:30 ` Huang Shijie
2016-12-02 14:05 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] mm: fix the "counter.sh" failure for libhugetlbfs Michal Hocko
2016-12-02 14:05 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161202135229.GJ6830@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.