From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
alexander.shishkin@intel.com, kan.liang@intel.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/x86: Fix exclusion of BTS and LBR for Goldmont
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 16:49:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161209154957.GV3124@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161209001417.4713-1-andi@firstfloor.org>
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 04:14:17PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
>
> An earlier patch allowed enabling PT and LBR at the same
> time on Goldmont. However it also allowed enabling BTS and LBR
> at the same time, which is still not supported. Fix this by
> bypassing the check only for PT.
>
> Marking for stable because this allows crashing kernels. Also
> should be merged for 4.9.
>
> Fixes: ccbebba4c6bf ("erf/x86/intel/pt: Bypass PT vs. LBR exclusivity if the core supports it")
> Cc: alexander.shishkin@intel.com
> Cc: kan.liang@intel.com
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> v2: Paint bike shed differently.
Now, if only you'd also clarified the point I asked about. By
documenting these cases we not only get easier to read code, but can
also verify if the code does what is intended.
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> ---
Changed that to the below, which is more explicit on the what is and is
not allowed. And fixed the definition of lbr_pt_coexist.
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -365,7 +365,11 @@ int x86_add_exclusive(unsigned int what)
{
int i;
- if (x86_pmu.lbr_pt_coexist)
+ /*
+ * When lbr_pt_coexist we allow PT to coexist with either LBR or BTS.
+ * LBR and BTS are still mutually exclusive.
+ */
+ if (x86_pmu.lbr_pt_coexist && what == x86_lbr_exclusive_pt)
return 0;
if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&x86_pmu.lbr_exclusive[what])) {
@@ -388,7 +392,7 @@ int x86_add_exclusive(unsigned int what)
void x86_del_exclusive(unsigned int what)
{
- if (x86_pmu.lbr_pt_coexist)
+ if (x86_pmu.lbr_pt_coexist && what == x86_lbr_exclusive_pt)
return;
atomic_dec(&x86_pmu.lbr_exclusive[what]);
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -604,7 +604,7 @@ struct x86_pmu {
u64 lbr_sel_mask; /* LBR_SELECT valid bits */
const int *lbr_sel_map; /* lbr_select mappings */
bool lbr_double_abort; /* duplicated lbr aborts */
- bool lbr_pt_coexist; /* LBR may coexist with PT */
+ bool lbr_pt_coexist; /* (LBR|BTS) may coexist with PT */
/*
* Intel PT/LBR/BTS are exclusive
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-09 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-09 0:14 [PATCH] perf/x86: Fix exclusion of BTS and LBR for Goldmont Andi Kleen
2016-12-09 15:49 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-12-12 6:49 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Andi Kleen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-12-02 23:17 [PATCH] " Andi Kleen
2016-12-06 12:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-06 14:53 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161209154957.GV3124@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.