From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: add cmpxchg64 helper for ARMv7-M
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 13:32:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161210123234.GA5468@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161210103646.1407256-1-arnd@arndb.de>
Hi Arnd,
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 11:36:34AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> A change to the netfilter code in net-next introduced the first caller of
> cmpxchg64 that can get built on ARMv7-M, leading to an error from the
> assembler that points out the lack of 64-bit atomics on this architecture:
>
> /tmp/ccMe7djj.s: Assembler messages:
> /tmp/ccMe7djj.s:367: Error: selected processor does not support `ldrexd r0,r1,[lr]' in Thumb mode
> /tmp/ccMe7djj.s:371: Error: selected processor does not support `strexd ip,r2,r3,[lr]' in Thumb mode
> /tmp/ccMe7djj.s:389: Error: selected processor does not support `ldrexd r8,r9,[r7]' in Thumb mode
> /tmp/ccMe7djj.s:393: Error: selected processor does not support `strexd lr,r0,r1,[r7]' in Thumb mode
> scripts/Makefile.build:299: recipe for target 'net/netfilter/nft_counter.o' failed
>
> This makes ARMv7-M use the same emulation from asm-generic/cmpxchg-local.h
> that we use on architectures earlier than ARMv6K, to fix the build. The
> 32-bit atomics are available on ARMv7-M and we keep using them there.
> This ARM specific change is probably something we should do regardless
> of the netfilter code.
>
> However, looking at the new nft_counter_reset() function in nft_counter.c,
> this looks incorrect to me not just on ARMv7-M but also on other
> architectures, with at least the following possible race:
Right, Eric Dumazet already spotted this problem. I'm preparing a
patch that doesn't require cmpxchg64(). Will keep you on Cc. Thanks.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: pablo@netfilter.org (Pablo Neira Ayuso)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: add cmpxchg64 helper for ARMv7-M
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 13:32:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161210123234.GA5468@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161210103646.1407256-1-arnd@arndb.de>
Hi Arnd,
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 11:36:34AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> A change to the netfilter code in net-next introduced the first caller of
> cmpxchg64 that can get built on ARMv7-M, leading to an error from the
> assembler that points out the lack of 64-bit atomics on this architecture:
>
> /tmp/ccMe7djj.s: Assembler messages:
> /tmp/ccMe7djj.s:367: Error: selected processor does not support `ldrexd r0,r1,[lr]' in Thumb mode
> /tmp/ccMe7djj.s:371: Error: selected processor does not support `strexd ip,r2,r3,[lr]' in Thumb mode
> /tmp/ccMe7djj.s:389: Error: selected processor does not support `ldrexd r8,r9,[r7]' in Thumb mode
> /tmp/ccMe7djj.s:393: Error: selected processor does not support `strexd lr,r0,r1,[r7]' in Thumb mode
> scripts/Makefile.build:299: recipe for target 'net/netfilter/nft_counter.o' failed
>
> This makes ARMv7-M use the same emulation from asm-generic/cmpxchg-local.h
> that we use on architectures earlier than ARMv6K, to fix the build. The
> 32-bit atomics are available on ARMv7-M and we keep using them there.
> This ARM specific change is probably something we should do regardless
> of the netfilter code.
>
> However, looking at the new nft_counter_reset() function in nft_counter.c,
> this looks incorrect to me not just on ARMv7-M but also on other
> architectures, with at least the following possible race:
Right, Eric Dumazet already spotted this problem. I'm preparing a
patch that doesn't require cmpxchg64(). Will keep you on Cc. Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-10 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-10 10:36 [PATCH] ARM: add cmpxchg64 helper for ARMv7-M Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-10 10:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-12-10 12:32 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2016-12-10 12:32 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-12-13 16:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-12-13 16:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-12-13 16:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161210123234.GA5468@salvia \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.