From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 2/5] lib: implement __arch_bitrev8x4()
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:06:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161219100614.GC4508@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6c1c052d3c1d0c02a791aaaf8e114360ab1cb4e7.1481918884.git.stillcompiling@gmail.com>
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 03:17:51PM -0800, Joshua Clayton wrote:
> Implement faster bitrev8x4() for arm, arm64 and mips, all the platforms
> with CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_BITREVERSE.
> ARM platforms just need a byteswap added to the existing __arch_bitrev32()
> Amusingly, the mips implementation is exactly the opposite, requiring
> removal of the byteswap from its __arch_bitrev32()
>
> Signed-off-by: Joshua Clayton <stillcompiling@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/bitrev.h | 6 ++++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/bitrev.h | 6 ++++++
> arch/mips/include/asm/bitrev.h | 6 ++++++
> include/linux/bitrev.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/bitrev.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/bitrev.h
> index ec291c3..9482f78 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/bitrev.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/bitrev.h
> @@ -17,4 +17,10 @@ static __always_inline __attribute_const__ u8 __arch_bitrev8(u8 x)
> return __arch_bitrev32((u32)x) >> 24;
> }
>
> +static __always_inline __attribute_const__ u32 __arch_bitrev8x4(u32 x)
> +{
> + __asm__ ("rbit %0, %1; rev %0, %0" : "=r" (x) : "r" (x));
> + return x;
> +}
> +
> #endif
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/bitrev.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/bitrev.h
> index a5a0c36..1801078 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/bitrev.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/bitrev.h
> @@ -16,4 +16,10 @@ static __always_inline __attribute_const__ u8 __arch_bitrev8(u8 x)
> return __arch_bitrev32((u32)x) >> 24;
> }
>
> +static __always_inline __attribute_const__ u32 __arch_bitrev8x4(u32 x)
> +{
> + __asm__ ("rbit %0, %1; rev %0, %0" : "=r" (x) : "r" (x));
This is broken -- you're operating on 64-bit registers. I only noticed
because if you write:
swab32(bitrev32(x))
then GCC generates:
rbit w0, w0
rev w0, w0
so perhaps we should just implement the asm-generic version like that
and not bother with the arch-specific stuff?
Will
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Joshua Clayton <stillcompiling@gmail.com>
Cc: Alan Tull <atull@opensource.altera.com>,
Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@ettus.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] lib: implement __arch_bitrev8x4()
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:06:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161219100614.GC4508@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6c1c052d3c1d0c02a791aaaf8e114360ab1cb4e7.1481918884.git.stillcompiling@gmail.com>
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 03:17:51PM -0800, Joshua Clayton wrote:
> Implement faster bitrev8x4() for arm, arm64 and mips, all the platforms
> with CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_BITREVERSE.
> ARM platforms just need a byteswap added to the existing __arch_bitrev32()
> Amusingly, the mips implementation is exactly the opposite, requiring
> removal of the byteswap from its __arch_bitrev32()
>
> Signed-off-by: Joshua Clayton <stillcompiling@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/bitrev.h | 6 ++++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/bitrev.h | 6 ++++++
> arch/mips/include/asm/bitrev.h | 6 ++++++
> include/linux/bitrev.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/bitrev.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/bitrev.h
> index ec291c3..9482f78 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/bitrev.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/bitrev.h
> @@ -17,4 +17,10 @@ static __always_inline __attribute_const__ u8 __arch_bitrev8(u8 x)
> return __arch_bitrev32((u32)x) >> 24;
> }
>
> +static __always_inline __attribute_const__ u32 __arch_bitrev8x4(u32 x)
> +{
> + __asm__ ("rbit %0, %1; rev %0, %0" : "=r" (x) : "r" (x));
> + return x;
> +}
> +
> #endif
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/bitrev.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/bitrev.h
> index a5a0c36..1801078 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/bitrev.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/bitrev.h
> @@ -16,4 +16,10 @@ static __always_inline __attribute_const__ u8 __arch_bitrev8(u8 x)
> return __arch_bitrev32((u32)x) >> 24;
> }
>
> +static __always_inline __attribute_const__ u32 __arch_bitrev8x4(u32 x)
> +{
> + __asm__ ("rbit %0, %1; rev %0, %0" : "=r" (x) : "r" (x));
This is broken -- you're operating on 64-bit registers. I only noticed
because if you write:
swab32(bitrev32(x))
then GCC generates:
rbit w0, w0
rev w0, w0
so perhaps we should just implement the asm-generic version like that
and not bother with the arch-specific stuff?
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-19 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-16 23:17 [PATCH v6 0/5] Altera Cyclone Passive Serial SPI FPGA Manager Joshua Clayton
2016-12-16 23:17 ` Joshua Clayton
2016-12-16 23:17 ` Joshua Clayton
2016-12-16 23:17 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] lib: add bitrev8x4() Joshua Clayton
2016-12-16 23:17 ` Joshua Clayton
2016-12-16 23:17 ` Joshua Clayton
2016-12-16 23:17 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] lib: implement __arch_bitrev8x4() Joshua Clayton
2016-12-16 23:17 ` Joshua Clayton
2016-12-16 23:17 ` Joshua Clayton
2016-12-19 10:06 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2016-12-19 10:06 ` Will Deacon
2016-12-20 17:22 ` Joshua Clayton
2016-12-20 17:22 ` Joshua Clayton
2016-12-20 17:22 ` Joshua Clayton
2016-12-16 23:17 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] doc: dt: add cyclone-ps-spi binding document Joshua Clayton
2016-12-16 23:17 ` Joshua Clayton
2016-12-16 23:17 ` Joshua Clayton
2016-12-19 2:19 ` Alan Tull
2016-12-19 2:19 ` Alan Tull
2016-12-19 2:19 ` Alan Tull
2016-12-16 23:17 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] fpga manager: Add cyclone-ps-spi driver for Altera FPGAs Joshua Clayton
2016-12-16 23:17 ` Joshua Clayton
2016-12-16 23:17 ` Joshua Clayton
2016-12-19 7:23 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-12-19 7:23 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-12-20 19:47 ` Joshua Clayton
2016-12-20 19:47 ` Joshua Clayton
2016-12-20 19:47 ` Joshua Clayton
2016-12-20 20:44 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-12-20 20:44 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-12-16 23:17 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] ARM: dts: imx6q-evi: support cyclone-ps-spi Joshua Clayton
2016-12-16 23:17 ` Joshua Clayton
2016-12-16 23:17 ` Joshua Clayton
2016-12-19 2:23 ` Alan Tull
2016-12-19 2:23 ` Alan Tull
2016-12-19 2:23 ` Alan Tull
2016-12-19 2:14 ` [PATCH v6 0/5] Altera Cyclone Passive Serial SPI FPGA Manager Alan Tull
2016-12-19 2:14 ` Alan Tull
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161219100614.GC4508@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.