All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mm, thp: always direct reclaim for MADV_HUGEPAGE even when deferred
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 13:56:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161230125615.GH13301@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161230123620.jcuquzof3bpxomdn@techsingularity.net>

On Fri 30-12-16 12:36:20, Mel Gorman wrote:
[...]
> I'll neither ack nor nak this patch. However, I would much prefer an
> additional option be added to sysfs called defer-fault that would avoid
> all fault-based stalls but still potentially stall for MADV_HUGEPAGE.

Would you consider changing the semantic of defer=madvise to invoke
KSWAPD for !madvised vmas as acceptable. It would be a change in
semantic but I am wondering what would be a risk and potential
regression space.

Also I am planning to send a pro-active compaction based on a
"watermark" as an LSF/MM topic proposal. I suspect that no additional
thp specific tunable will be needed if we have a proper compaction
watermark tunable.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mm, thp: always direct reclaim for MADV_HUGEPAGE even when deferred
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 13:56:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161230125615.GH13301@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161230123620.jcuquzof3bpxomdn@techsingularity.net>

On Fri 30-12-16 12:36:20, Mel Gorman wrote:
[...]
> I'll neither ack nor nak this patch. However, I would much prefer an
> additional option be added to sysfs called defer-fault that would avoid
> all fault-based stalls but still potentially stall for MADV_HUGEPAGE.

Would you consider changing the semantic of defer=madvise to invoke
KSWAPD for !madvised vmas as acceptable. It would be a change in
semantic but I am wondering what would be a risk and potential
regression space.

Also I am planning to send a pro-active compaction based on a
"watermark" as an LSF/MM topic proposal. I suspect that no additional
thp specific tunable will be needed if we have a proper compaction
watermark tunable.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-30 12:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-22  0:21 [patch] mm, thp: always direct reclaim for MADV_HUGEPAGE even when deferred David Rientjes
2016-12-22  0:21 ` David Rientjes
2016-12-22  8:31 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-12-22  8:31   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-12-22 10:00 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-22 10:00   ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-22 21:05   ` David Rientjes
2016-12-22 21:05     ` David Rientjes
2016-12-23  8:51     ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-23  8:51       ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-23 10:01       ` David Rientjes
2016-12-23 10:01         ` David Rientjes
2016-12-23 11:18         ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-23 11:18           ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-23 22:46           ` David Rientjes
2016-12-23 22:46             ` David Rientjes
2016-12-26  9:02             ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-26  9:02               ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-27  0:53               ` David Rientjes
2016-12-27  0:53                 ` David Rientjes
2016-12-27  2:32                 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-12-27  2:32                   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-12-27  9:41                 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-27  9:41                   ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-27 21:36                   ` David Rientjes
2016-12-27 21:36                     ` David Rientjes
2016-12-28  8:48                     ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-28  8:48                       ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-28 21:33                       ` David Rientjes
2016-12-28 21:33                         ` David Rientjes
2016-12-29  8:24                         ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-29  8:24                           ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-30 12:36     ` Mel Gorman
2016-12-30 12:36       ` Mel Gorman
2016-12-30 12:56       ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2016-12-30 12:56         ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-30 14:08         ` Mel Gorman
2016-12-30 14:08           ` Mel Gorman
2016-12-30 22:30       ` David Rientjes
2016-12-30 22:30         ` David Rientjes
2017-01-03 10:37         ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-03 10:37           ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-03 21:57           ` David Rientjes
2017-01-03 21:57             ` David Rientjes
2017-01-04 10:12             ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-04 10:12               ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-04 21:53               ` David Rientjes
2017-01-04 21:53                 ` David Rientjes
2017-01-02  8:38 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-02  8:38   ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-03 22:44   ` David Rientjes
2017-01-03 22:44     ` David Rientjes
2017-01-04  8:32     ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-04  8:32       ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-04  9:46       ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-04  9:46         ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-04 22:04       ` David Rientjes
2017-01-04 22:04         ` David Rientjes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161230125615.GH13301@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.