From: shawnguo@kernel.org (Shawn Guo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 5/5] soc: zte: pm_domains: Add support for zx296718
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 15:38:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170105073846.GD4667@x250> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1483530494-14177-5-git-send-email-baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 07:48:14PM +0800, Baoyou Xie wrote:
> This patch introduces the power domain driver of zx296718
> which belongs to zte's zx2967 family.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/soc/zte/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/soc/zte/zx296718_pm_domains.c | 181 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 182 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/zte/zx296718_pm_domains.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/zte/Makefile b/drivers/soc/zte/Makefile
> index 8a37f2f..96b7cd4 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/zte/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/soc/zte/Makefile
> @@ -2,3 +2,4 @@
> # ZTE SOC drivers
> #
> obj-$(CONFIG_ZX2967_PM_DOMAINS) += zx2967_pm_domains.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ZX2967_PM_DOMAINS) += zx296718_pm_domains.o
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/zte/zx296718_pm_domains.c b/drivers/soc/zte/zx296718_pm_domains.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..52003ee
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/soc/zte/zx296718_pm_domains.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2017 ZTE Ltd.
> + *
> + * Author: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
> + * License terms: GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2
> + */
Please have a newline between licence declaration and headers to improve
the readability. Same for zx2967_pm_domains.c.
> +#include <dt-bindings/soc/zte,pm_domains.h>
> +#include "zx2967_pm_domains.h"
> +
> +static u16 zx296718_offsets[REG_ARRAY_SIZE] = {
> + [REG_CLKEN] = 0x18,
> + [REG_ISOEN] = 0x1c,
> + [REG_RSTEN] = 0x20,
> + [REG_PWREN] = 0x24,
> + [REG_ACK_SYNC] = 0x28,
> +};
> +
> +enum {
> + PCU_DM_VOU = 0,
> + PCU_DM_SAPPU,
> + PCU_DM_VDE,
> + PCU_DM_VCE,
> + PCU_DM_HDE,
> + PCU_DM_VIU,
> + PCU_DM_USB20,
> + PCU_DM_USB21,
> + PCU_DM_USB30,
> + PCU_DM_HSIC,
> + PCU_DM_GMAC,
> + PCU_DM_TS,
> +};
I think we can save this enum completely by defining those
DM_ZX296718_xxx constants in zte,pm_domains.h in the same order of this
enum (hardware bit position order), so that DM_ZX296718_xxx can directly
be used as .bit field of struct zx2967_pm_domain.
#define DM_ZX296718_VOU 0
#define DM_ZX296718_SAPPU 1
#define DM_ZX296718_VDE 2 /* g1v6 */
#define DM_ZX296718_VCE 3 /* h1v6 */
#define DM_ZX296718_HDE 4 /* g2v2 */
#define DM_ZX296718_VIU 5
#define DM_ZX296718_USB20 6
#define DM_ZX296718_USB21 7
#define DM_ZX296718_USB30 8
#define DM_ZX296718_HSIC 9
#define DM_ZX296718_GMAC 10
#define DM_ZX296718_TS 11
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain vou_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "vou_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_VOU,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain sappu_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "sappu_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_SAPPU,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain vde_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "vde_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_VDE,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain vce_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "vce_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_VCE,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain hde_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "hde_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_HDE,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain viu_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "viu_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_VIU,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain usb20_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "usb20_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_USB20,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain usb21_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "usb21_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_USB21,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain usb30_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "usb30_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_USB30,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain hsic_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "hsic_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_HSIC,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain gmac_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "gmac_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_GMAC,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain ts_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "ts_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_TS,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct generic_pm_domain *zx296718_pm_domains[] = {
> + [DM_ZX296718_SAPPU] = &sappu_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_VDE] = &vde_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_VCE] = &vce_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_HDE] = &hde_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_VIU] = &viu_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_USB20] = &usb20_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_USB21] = &usb21_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_USB30] = &usb30_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_HSIC] = &hsic_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_GMAC] = &gmac_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_TS] = &ts_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_VOU] = &vou_domain.dm,
If you update the order of DM_ZX296718_xxx in zte,pm_domains.h, it would
be nice to update this list accordingly as well.
> +};
> +
> +static int zx296718_pd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + return zx2967_pd_probe(pdev,
> + zx296718_pm_domains,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(zx296718_pm_domains));
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id zx296718_pm_domain_matches[] = {
> + { .compatible = "zte,zx296718-pcu", },
> + { },
> +};
> +
> +static struct platform_driver zx296718_pd_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "zx-powerdomain",
This is a zx296718 specific driver. So zx296718-powerdomain should
be a better name?
Shawn
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .of_match_table = zx296718_pm_domain_matches,
> + },
> + .probe = zx296718_pd_probe,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init zx296718_pd_init(void)
> +{
> + return platform_driver_register(&zx296718_pd_driver);
> +}
> +subsys_initcall(zx296718_pd_init);
> --
> 2.7.4
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
To: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, amitdanielk@gmail.com,
ulf.hansson@linaro.org, geert+renesas@glider.be, arnd@arndb.de,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, pankaj.dubey@samsung.com,
xie.baoyou@zte.com.cn, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
krzk@kernel.org, claudiu.manoil@nxp.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
chen.chaokai@zte.com.cn, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com,
yangbo.lu@nxp.com, wang.qiang01@zte.com.cn, jun.nie@linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] soc: zte: pm_domains: Add support for zx296718
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 15:38:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170105073846.GD4667@x250> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1483530494-14177-5-git-send-email-baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 07:48:14PM +0800, Baoyou Xie wrote:
> This patch introduces the power domain driver of zx296718
> which belongs to zte's zx2967 family.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/soc/zte/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/soc/zte/zx296718_pm_domains.c | 181 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 182 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/zte/zx296718_pm_domains.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/zte/Makefile b/drivers/soc/zte/Makefile
> index 8a37f2f..96b7cd4 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/zte/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/soc/zte/Makefile
> @@ -2,3 +2,4 @@
> # ZTE SOC drivers
> #
> obj-$(CONFIG_ZX2967_PM_DOMAINS) += zx2967_pm_domains.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ZX2967_PM_DOMAINS) += zx296718_pm_domains.o
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/zte/zx296718_pm_domains.c b/drivers/soc/zte/zx296718_pm_domains.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..52003ee
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/soc/zte/zx296718_pm_domains.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2017 ZTE Ltd.
> + *
> + * Author: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
> + * License terms: GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2
> + */
Please have a newline between licence declaration and headers to improve
the readability. Same for zx2967_pm_domains.c.
> +#include <dt-bindings/soc/zte,pm_domains.h>
> +#include "zx2967_pm_domains.h"
> +
> +static u16 zx296718_offsets[REG_ARRAY_SIZE] = {
> + [REG_CLKEN] = 0x18,
> + [REG_ISOEN] = 0x1c,
> + [REG_RSTEN] = 0x20,
> + [REG_PWREN] = 0x24,
> + [REG_ACK_SYNC] = 0x28,
> +};
> +
> +enum {
> + PCU_DM_VOU = 0,
> + PCU_DM_SAPPU,
> + PCU_DM_VDE,
> + PCU_DM_VCE,
> + PCU_DM_HDE,
> + PCU_DM_VIU,
> + PCU_DM_USB20,
> + PCU_DM_USB21,
> + PCU_DM_USB30,
> + PCU_DM_HSIC,
> + PCU_DM_GMAC,
> + PCU_DM_TS,
> +};
I think we can save this enum completely by defining those
DM_ZX296718_xxx constants in zte,pm_domains.h in the same order of this
enum (hardware bit position order), so that DM_ZX296718_xxx can directly
be used as .bit field of struct zx2967_pm_domain.
#define DM_ZX296718_VOU 0
#define DM_ZX296718_SAPPU 1
#define DM_ZX296718_VDE 2 /* g1v6 */
#define DM_ZX296718_VCE 3 /* h1v6 */
#define DM_ZX296718_HDE 4 /* g2v2 */
#define DM_ZX296718_VIU 5
#define DM_ZX296718_USB20 6
#define DM_ZX296718_USB21 7
#define DM_ZX296718_USB30 8
#define DM_ZX296718_HSIC 9
#define DM_ZX296718_GMAC 10
#define DM_ZX296718_TS 11
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain vou_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "vou_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_VOU,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain sappu_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "sappu_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_SAPPU,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain vde_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "vde_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_VDE,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain vce_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "vce_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_VCE,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain hde_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "hde_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_HDE,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain viu_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "viu_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_VIU,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain usb20_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "usb20_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_USB20,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain usb21_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "usb21_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_USB21,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain usb30_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "usb30_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_USB30,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain hsic_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "hsic_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_HSIC,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain gmac_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "gmac_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_GMAC,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain ts_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "ts_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_TS,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct generic_pm_domain *zx296718_pm_domains[] = {
> + [DM_ZX296718_SAPPU] = &sappu_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_VDE] = &vde_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_VCE] = &vce_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_HDE] = &hde_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_VIU] = &viu_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_USB20] = &usb20_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_USB21] = &usb21_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_USB30] = &usb30_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_HSIC] = &hsic_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_GMAC] = &gmac_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_TS] = &ts_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_VOU] = &vou_domain.dm,
If you update the order of DM_ZX296718_xxx in zte,pm_domains.h, it would
be nice to update this list accordingly as well.
> +};
> +
> +static int zx296718_pd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + return zx2967_pd_probe(pdev,
> + zx296718_pm_domains,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(zx296718_pm_domains));
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id zx296718_pm_domain_matches[] = {
> + { .compatible = "zte,zx296718-pcu", },
> + { },
> +};
> +
> +static struct platform_driver zx296718_pd_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "zx-powerdomain",
This is a zx296718 specific driver. So zx296718-powerdomain should
be a better name?
Shawn
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .of_match_table = zx296718_pm_domain_matches,
> + },
> + .probe = zx296718_pd_probe,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init zx296718_pd_init(void)
> +{
> + return platform_driver_register(&zx296718_pd_driver);
> +}
> +subsys_initcall(zx296718_pd_init);
> --
> 2.7.4
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
To: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
Cc: jun.nie@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
krzk@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, ulf.hansson@linaro.org,
amitdanielk@gmail.com, claudiu.manoil@nxp.com, yangbo.lu@nxp.com,
pankaj.dubey@samsung.com, geert+renesas@glider.be,
laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xie.baoyou@zte.com.cn,
chen.chaokai@zte.com.cn, wang.qiang01@zte.com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] soc: zte: pm_domains: Add support for zx296718
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 15:38:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170105073846.GD4667@x250> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1483530494-14177-5-git-send-email-baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 07:48:14PM +0800, Baoyou Xie wrote:
> This patch introduces the power domain driver of zx296718
> which belongs to zte's zx2967 family.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/soc/zte/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/soc/zte/zx296718_pm_domains.c | 181 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 182 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/zte/zx296718_pm_domains.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/zte/Makefile b/drivers/soc/zte/Makefile
> index 8a37f2f..96b7cd4 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/zte/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/soc/zte/Makefile
> @@ -2,3 +2,4 @@
> # ZTE SOC drivers
> #
> obj-$(CONFIG_ZX2967_PM_DOMAINS) += zx2967_pm_domains.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ZX2967_PM_DOMAINS) += zx296718_pm_domains.o
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/zte/zx296718_pm_domains.c b/drivers/soc/zte/zx296718_pm_domains.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..52003ee
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/soc/zte/zx296718_pm_domains.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2017 ZTE Ltd.
> + *
> + * Author: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
> + * License terms: GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2
> + */
Please have a newline between licence declaration and headers to improve
the readability. Same for zx2967_pm_domains.c.
> +#include <dt-bindings/soc/zte,pm_domains.h>
> +#include "zx2967_pm_domains.h"
> +
> +static u16 zx296718_offsets[REG_ARRAY_SIZE] = {
> + [REG_CLKEN] = 0x18,
> + [REG_ISOEN] = 0x1c,
> + [REG_RSTEN] = 0x20,
> + [REG_PWREN] = 0x24,
> + [REG_ACK_SYNC] = 0x28,
> +};
> +
> +enum {
> + PCU_DM_VOU = 0,
> + PCU_DM_SAPPU,
> + PCU_DM_VDE,
> + PCU_DM_VCE,
> + PCU_DM_HDE,
> + PCU_DM_VIU,
> + PCU_DM_USB20,
> + PCU_DM_USB21,
> + PCU_DM_USB30,
> + PCU_DM_HSIC,
> + PCU_DM_GMAC,
> + PCU_DM_TS,
> +};
I think we can save this enum completely by defining those
DM_ZX296718_xxx constants in zte,pm_domains.h in the same order of this
enum (hardware bit position order), so that DM_ZX296718_xxx can directly
be used as .bit field of struct zx2967_pm_domain.
#define DM_ZX296718_VOU 0
#define DM_ZX296718_SAPPU 1
#define DM_ZX296718_VDE 2 /* g1v6 */
#define DM_ZX296718_VCE 3 /* h1v6 */
#define DM_ZX296718_HDE 4 /* g2v2 */
#define DM_ZX296718_VIU 5
#define DM_ZX296718_USB20 6
#define DM_ZX296718_USB21 7
#define DM_ZX296718_USB30 8
#define DM_ZX296718_HSIC 9
#define DM_ZX296718_GMAC 10
#define DM_ZX296718_TS 11
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain vou_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "vou_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_VOU,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain sappu_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "sappu_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_SAPPU,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain vde_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "vde_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_VDE,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain vce_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "vce_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_VCE,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain hde_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "hde_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_HDE,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain viu_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "viu_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_VIU,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain usb20_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "usb20_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_USB20,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain usb21_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "usb21_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_USB21,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain usb30_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "usb30_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_USB30,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain hsic_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "hsic_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_HSIC,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain gmac_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "gmac_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_GMAC,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct zx2967_pm_domain ts_domain = {
> + .dm = {
> + .name = "ts_domain",
> + },
> + .bit = PCU_DM_TS,
> + .polarity = PWREN,
> + .reg_offset = zx296718_offsets,
> +};
> +
> +static struct generic_pm_domain *zx296718_pm_domains[] = {
> + [DM_ZX296718_SAPPU] = &sappu_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_VDE] = &vde_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_VCE] = &vce_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_HDE] = &hde_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_VIU] = &viu_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_USB20] = &usb20_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_USB21] = &usb21_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_USB30] = &usb30_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_HSIC] = &hsic_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_GMAC] = &gmac_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_TS] = &ts_domain.dm,
> + [DM_ZX296718_VOU] = &vou_domain.dm,
If you update the order of DM_ZX296718_xxx in zte,pm_domains.h, it would
be nice to update this list accordingly as well.
> +};
> +
> +static int zx296718_pd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + return zx2967_pd_probe(pdev,
> + zx296718_pm_domains,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(zx296718_pm_domains));
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id zx296718_pm_domain_matches[] = {
> + { .compatible = "zte,zx296718-pcu", },
> + { },
> +};
> +
> +static struct platform_driver zx296718_pd_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "zx-powerdomain",
This is a zx296718 specific driver. So zx296718-powerdomain should
be a better name?
Shawn
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .of_match_table = zx296718_pm_domain_matches,
> + },
> + .probe = zx296718_pd_probe,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init zx296718_pd_init(void)
> +{
> + return platform_driver_register(&zx296718_pd_driver);
> +}
> +subsys_initcall(zx296718_pd_init);
> --
> 2.7.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-05 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-04 11:48 [PATCH v6 1/5] dt-bindings: zte: documents zx2967 power domain driver bindings Baoyou Xie
2017-01-04 11:48 ` Baoyou Xie
2017-01-04 11:48 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] MAINTAINERS: add zx2967 SoC drivers to ARM ZTE architecture Baoyou Xie
2017-01-04 11:48 ` Baoyou Xie
2017-01-04 11:48 ` Baoyou Xie
2017-01-05 6:49 ` Shawn Guo
2017-01-05 6:49 ` Shawn Guo
2017-01-05 6:49 ` Shawn Guo
2017-01-04 11:48 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] soc: zte: Add header for PM domains specifiers Baoyou Xie
2017-01-04 11:48 ` Baoyou Xie
2017-01-04 11:48 ` Baoyou Xie
2017-01-04 11:48 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] soc: zte: pm_domains: Prepare for supporting ARMv8 zx2967 family Baoyou Xie
2017-01-04 11:48 ` Baoyou Xie
2017-01-05 7:05 ` Shawn Guo
2017-01-05 7:05 ` Shawn Guo
2017-01-05 7:05 ` Shawn Guo
2017-01-04 11:48 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] soc: zte: pm_domains: Add support for zx296718 Baoyou Xie
2017-01-04 11:48 ` Baoyou Xie
2017-01-04 11:48 ` Baoyou Xie
2017-01-05 7:38 ` Shawn Guo [this message]
2017-01-05 7:38 ` Shawn Guo
2017-01-05 7:38 ` Shawn Guo
2017-01-06 8:23 ` Baoyou Xie
2017-01-04 14:54 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] dt-bindings: zte: documents zx2967 power domain driver bindings Rob Herring
2017-01-04 14:54 ` Rob Herring
2017-01-05 6:46 ` Shawn Guo
2017-01-05 6:46 ` Shawn Guo
2017-01-05 6:46 ` Shawn Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170105073846.GD4667@x250 \
--to=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.