All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
To: Aravinda Prasad <aravinda@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: gleb@kernel.org, agraf@suse.de, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	paulus@ozlabs.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] KVM: PPC: Exit guest upon MCE when FWNMI capability is enabled
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 09:17:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170112090553.GA3006@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <148396204569.1471.7515038338417988537.stgit@aravinda>

On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 05:10:45PM +0530, Aravinda Prasad wrote:
> Enhance KVM to cause a guest exit with KVM_EXIT_NMI
> exit reason upon a machine check exception (MCE) in
> the guest address space if the KVM_CAP_PPC_FWNMI
> capability is enabled (instead of delivering a 0x200
> interrupt to guest). This enables QEMU to build error
> log and deliver machine check exception to guest via
> guest registered machine check handler.
> 
> This approach simplifies the delivery of machine
> check exception to guest OS compared to the earlier
> approach of KVM directly invoking 0x200 guest interrupt
> vector.
> 
> This design/approach is based on the feedback for the
> QEMU patches to handle machine check exception. Details
> of earlier approach of handling machine check exception
> in QEMU and related discussions can be found at:
> 
> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-11/msg00813.html
> 
> Note:
> 
> This patch introduces a hook which is invoked at the time
> of guest exit to facilitate the host-side handling of
> machine check exception before the exception is passed
> on to the guest. Hence, the host-side handling which was
> performed earlier via machine_check_fwnmi is removed.
> 
> The reasons for this approach is (i) it is not possible
> to distinguish whether the exception occurred in the
> guest or the host from the pt_regs passed on the
> machine_check_exception(). Hence machine_check_exception()
> calls panic, instead of passing on the exception to
> the guest, if the machine check exception is not
> recoverable. (ii) the approach introduced in this
> patch gives opportunity to the host kernel to perform
> actions in virtual mode before passing on the exception
> to the guest. This approach does not require complex
> tweaks to machine_check_fwnmi and friends.

It would be good to qualify the different types of MCE
and what action we expect across hypervisor and guest.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Aravinda Prasad <aravinda@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c            |   27 +++++++++++++-----
>  arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S |   47 ++++++++++++++++---------------
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c   |   10 +++++++
>  3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> index 3686471..cae4921 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(halt_poll_ns_shrink, "Factor halt poll time is shrunk by");
>  
>  static void kvmppc_end_cede(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  static int kvmppc_hv_setup_htab_rma(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +static void kvmppc_machine_check_hook(void);
>  
>  static inline struct kvm_vcpu *next_runnable_thread(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc,
>  		int *ip)
> @@ -954,15 +955,14 @@ static int kvmppc_handle_exit_hv(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  		r = RESUME_GUEST;
>  		break;
>  	case BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_MACHINE_CHECK:
> +		/* Exit to guest with KVM_EXIT_NMI as exit reason */
> +		run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_NMI;
> +		r = RESUME_HOST;
>  		/*
> -		 * Deliver a machine check interrupt to the guest.
> -		 * We have to do this, even if the host has handled the
> -		 * machine check, because machine checks use SRR0/1 and
> -		 * the interrupt might have trashed guest state in them.
> +		 * Invoke host-kernel handler to perform any host-side
> +		 * handling before exiting the guest.
>  		 */
> -		kvmppc_book3s_queue_irqprio(vcpu,
> -					    BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_MACHINE_CHECK);
> -		r = RESUME_GUEST;
> +		kvmppc_machine_check_hook();
>  		break;
>  	case BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_PROGRAM:
>  	{
> @@ -3491,6 +3491,19 @@ static void kvmppc_irq_bypass_del_producer_hv(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons,
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> +/*
> + * Hook to handle machine check exceptions occurred inside a guest.
> + * This hook is invoked from host virtual mode from KVM before exiting
> + * the guest with KVM_EXIT_NMI exit reason. This gives an opportunity
> + * for the host to take action (if any) before passing on the machine
> + * check exception to the guest kernel.
> + */
> +static void kvmppc_machine_check_hook(void)
> +{
> +	if (ppc_md.machine_check_exception)
> +		ppc_md.machine_check_exception(NULL);
> +}
> +
>  static long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl_hv(struct file *filp,
>  				 unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg)
>  {
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
> index c3c1d1b..9b41390 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
> @@ -134,21 +134,18 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
>  	stb	r0, HSTATE_HWTHREAD_REQ(r13)
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * For external and machine check interrupts, we need
> -	 * to call the Linux handler to process the interrupt.
> -	 * We do that by jumping to absolute address 0x500 for
> -	 * external interrupts, or the machine_check_fwnmi label
> -	 * for machine checks (since firmware might have patched
> -	 * the vector area at 0x200).  The [h]rfid at the end of the
> -	 * handler will return to the book3s_hv_interrupts.S code.
> -	 * For other interrupts we do the rfid to get back
> -	 * to the book3s_hv_interrupts.S code here.
> +	 * For external interrupts we need to call the Linux
> +	 * handler to process the interrupt. We do that by jumping
> +	 * to absolute address 0x500 for external interrupts.
> +	 * The [h]rfid at the end of the handler will return to
> +	 * the book3s_hv_interrupts.S code. For other interrupts
> +	 * we do the rfid to get back to the book3s_hv_interrupts.S
> +	 * code here.
>  	 */
>  	ld	r8, 112+PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1)
>  	addi	r1, r1, 112
>  	ld	r7, HSTATE_HOST_MSR(r13)
>  
> -	cmpwi	cr1, r12, BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_MACHINE_CHECK
>  	cmpwi	r12, BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_EXTERNAL
>  	beq	11f
>  	cmpwi	r12, BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_H_DOORBELL
> @@ -163,7 +160,10 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
>  	mtmsrd	r6, 1			/* Clear RI in MSR */
>  	mtsrr0	r8
>  	mtsrr1	r7
> -	beq	cr1, 13f		/* machine check */
> +	/*
> +	 * BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_MACHINE_CHECK is handled at the
> +	 * time of guest exit
> +	 */
>  	RFI
>  
>  	/* On POWER7, we have external interrupts set to use HSRR0/1 */
> @@ -171,8 +171,6 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
>  	mtspr	SPRN_HSRR1, r7
>  	ba	0x500
>  
> -13:	b	machine_check_fwnmi
> -
>  14:	mtspr	SPRN_HSRR0, r8
>  	mtspr	SPRN_HSRR1, r7
>  	b	hmi_exception_after_realmode
> @@ -2338,15 +2336,13 @@ machine_check_realmode:
>  	ld	r9, HSTATE_KVM_VCPU(r13)
>  	li	r12, BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_MACHINE_CHECK
>  	/*
> -	 * Deliver unhandled/fatal (e.g. UE) MCE errors to guest through
> -	 * machine check interrupt (set HSRR0 to 0x200). And for handled
> -	 * errors (no-fatal), just go back to guest execution with current
> -	 * HSRR0 instead of exiting guest. This new approach will inject
> -	 * machine check to guest for fatal error causing guest to crash.
> -	 *
> -	 * The old code used to return to host for unhandled errors which
> -	 * was causing guest to hang with soft lockups inside guest and
> -	 * makes it difficult to recover guest instance.
> +	 * Deliver unhandled/fatal (e.g. UE) MCE errors to guest either
> +	 * through machine check interrupt (set HSRR0 to 0x200) or by
> +	 * exiting the guest with KVM_EXIT_NMI exit reason if guest is
> +	 * FWNMI capable. For handled errors (no-fatal), just go back
> +	 * to guest execution with current HSRR0. This new approach
> +	 * injects machine check errors in guest address space to guest
> +	 * enabling guest kernel to suitably handle such errors.
>  	 *
>  	 * if we receive machine check with MSR(RI=0) then deliver it to
>  	 * guest as machine check causing guest to crash.
> @@ -2360,7 +2356,12 @@ machine_check_realmode:
>  	cmpdi	r3, 0		/* Did we handle MCE ? */
>  	bne	2f	/* Continue guest execution. */
>  	/* If not, deliver a machine check.  SRR0/1 are already set */
> -1:	li	r10, BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_MACHINE_CHECK
> +	/* Check if guest is capable of handling NMI exit */
> +1:	ld	r3, VCPU_KVM(r9)
> +	lbz	r3, KVM_FWNMI(r3)
> +	cmpdi	r3, 1       /* FWNMI capable? */
> +	beq	mc_cont
> +	li	r10, BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_MACHINE_CHECK
>  	bl	kvmppc_msr_interrupt
>  2:	b	fast_interrupt_c_return
>  
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
> index 6c9a65b..25749c6 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
> @@ -446,6 +446,16 @@ int opal_machine_check(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  	}
>  	machine_check_print_event_info(&evt);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * If regs is NULL, then the machine check exception occurred
> +	 * in the guest. Currently no action is performed in the host
> +	 * other than printing the event information. The machine check
> +	 * exception is passed on to the guest kernel and the guest
> +	 * kernel will attempt for recovery.
> +	 */
> +	if (!regs)
> +		return 0;
> +

Shouldn't the host take action for example poison bad pages?

>  	if (opal_recover_mce(regs, &evt))
>  		return 1;
>  
>

Balbir Singh 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
To: Aravinda Prasad <aravinda@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: gleb@kernel.org, agraf@suse.de, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	paulus@ozlabs.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] KVM: PPC: Exit guest upon MCE when FWNMI capability is enabled
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 14:35:53 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170112090553.GA3006@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <148396204569.1471.7515038338417988537.stgit@aravinda>

On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 05:10:45PM +0530, Aravinda Prasad wrote:
> Enhance KVM to cause a guest exit with KVM_EXIT_NMI
> exit reason upon a machine check exception (MCE) in
> the guest address space if the KVM_CAP_PPC_FWNMI
> capability is enabled (instead of delivering a 0x200
> interrupt to guest). This enables QEMU to build error
> log and deliver machine check exception to guest via
> guest registered machine check handler.
> 
> This approach simplifies the delivery of machine
> check exception to guest OS compared to the earlier
> approach of KVM directly invoking 0x200 guest interrupt
> vector.
> 
> This design/approach is based on the feedback for the
> QEMU patches to handle machine check exception. Details
> of earlier approach of handling machine check exception
> in QEMU and related discussions can be found at:
> 
> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-11/msg00813.html
> 
> Note:
> 
> This patch introduces a hook which is invoked at the time
> of guest exit to facilitate the host-side handling of
> machine check exception before the exception is passed
> on to the guest. Hence, the host-side handling which was
> performed earlier via machine_check_fwnmi is removed.
> 
> The reasons for this approach is (i) it is not possible
> to distinguish whether the exception occurred in the
> guest or the host from the pt_regs passed on the
> machine_check_exception(). Hence machine_check_exception()
> calls panic, instead of passing on the exception to
> the guest, if the machine check exception is not
> recoverable. (ii) the approach introduced in this
> patch gives opportunity to the host kernel to perform
> actions in virtual mode before passing on the exception
> to the guest. This approach does not require complex
> tweaks to machine_check_fwnmi and friends.

It would be good to qualify the different types of MCE
and what action we expect across hypervisor and guest.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Aravinda Prasad <aravinda@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c            |   27 +++++++++++++-----
>  arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S |   47 ++++++++++++++++---------------
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c   |   10 +++++++
>  3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> index 3686471..cae4921 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(halt_poll_ns_shrink, "Factor halt poll time is shrunk by");
>  
>  static void kvmppc_end_cede(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  static int kvmppc_hv_setup_htab_rma(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +static void kvmppc_machine_check_hook(void);
>  
>  static inline struct kvm_vcpu *next_runnable_thread(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc,
>  		int *ip)
> @@ -954,15 +955,14 @@ static int kvmppc_handle_exit_hv(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  		r = RESUME_GUEST;
>  		break;
>  	case BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_MACHINE_CHECK:
> +		/* Exit to guest with KVM_EXIT_NMI as exit reason */
> +		run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_NMI;
> +		r = RESUME_HOST;
>  		/*
> -		 * Deliver a machine check interrupt to the guest.
> -		 * We have to do this, even if the host has handled the
> -		 * machine check, because machine checks use SRR0/1 and
> -		 * the interrupt might have trashed guest state in them.
> +		 * Invoke host-kernel handler to perform any host-side
> +		 * handling before exiting the guest.
>  		 */
> -		kvmppc_book3s_queue_irqprio(vcpu,
> -					    BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_MACHINE_CHECK);
> -		r = RESUME_GUEST;
> +		kvmppc_machine_check_hook();
>  		break;
>  	case BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_PROGRAM:
>  	{
> @@ -3491,6 +3491,19 @@ static void kvmppc_irq_bypass_del_producer_hv(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons,
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> +/*
> + * Hook to handle machine check exceptions occurred inside a guest.
> + * This hook is invoked from host virtual mode from KVM before exiting
> + * the guest with KVM_EXIT_NMI exit reason. This gives an opportunity
> + * for the host to take action (if any) before passing on the machine
> + * check exception to the guest kernel.
> + */
> +static void kvmppc_machine_check_hook(void)
> +{
> +	if (ppc_md.machine_check_exception)
> +		ppc_md.machine_check_exception(NULL);
> +}
> +
>  static long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl_hv(struct file *filp,
>  				 unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg)
>  {
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
> index c3c1d1b..9b41390 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
> @@ -134,21 +134,18 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
>  	stb	r0, HSTATE_HWTHREAD_REQ(r13)
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * For external and machine check interrupts, we need
> -	 * to call the Linux handler to process the interrupt.
> -	 * We do that by jumping to absolute address 0x500 for
> -	 * external interrupts, or the machine_check_fwnmi label
> -	 * for machine checks (since firmware might have patched
> -	 * the vector area at 0x200).  The [h]rfid at the end of the
> -	 * handler will return to the book3s_hv_interrupts.S code.
> -	 * For other interrupts we do the rfid to get back
> -	 * to the book3s_hv_interrupts.S code here.
> +	 * For external interrupts we need to call the Linux
> +	 * handler to process the interrupt. We do that by jumping
> +	 * to absolute address 0x500 for external interrupts.
> +	 * The [h]rfid at the end of the handler will return to
> +	 * the book3s_hv_interrupts.S code. For other interrupts
> +	 * we do the rfid to get back to the book3s_hv_interrupts.S
> +	 * code here.
>  	 */
>  	ld	r8, 112+PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1)
>  	addi	r1, r1, 112
>  	ld	r7, HSTATE_HOST_MSR(r13)
>  
> -	cmpwi	cr1, r12, BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_MACHINE_CHECK
>  	cmpwi	r12, BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_EXTERNAL
>  	beq	11f
>  	cmpwi	r12, BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_H_DOORBELL
> @@ -163,7 +160,10 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
>  	mtmsrd	r6, 1			/* Clear RI in MSR */
>  	mtsrr0	r8
>  	mtsrr1	r7
> -	beq	cr1, 13f		/* machine check */
> +	/*
> +	 * BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_MACHINE_CHECK is handled at the
> +	 * time of guest exit
> +	 */
>  	RFI
>  
>  	/* On POWER7, we have external interrupts set to use HSRR0/1 */
> @@ -171,8 +171,6 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
>  	mtspr	SPRN_HSRR1, r7
>  	ba	0x500
>  
> -13:	b	machine_check_fwnmi
> -
>  14:	mtspr	SPRN_HSRR0, r8
>  	mtspr	SPRN_HSRR1, r7
>  	b	hmi_exception_after_realmode
> @@ -2338,15 +2336,13 @@ machine_check_realmode:
>  	ld	r9, HSTATE_KVM_VCPU(r13)
>  	li	r12, BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_MACHINE_CHECK
>  	/*
> -	 * Deliver unhandled/fatal (e.g. UE) MCE errors to guest through
> -	 * machine check interrupt (set HSRR0 to 0x200). And for handled
> -	 * errors (no-fatal), just go back to guest execution with current
> -	 * HSRR0 instead of exiting guest. This new approach will inject
> -	 * machine check to guest for fatal error causing guest to crash.
> -	 *
> -	 * The old code used to return to host for unhandled errors which
> -	 * was causing guest to hang with soft lockups inside guest and
> -	 * makes it difficult to recover guest instance.
> +	 * Deliver unhandled/fatal (e.g. UE) MCE errors to guest either
> +	 * through machine check interrupt (set HSRR0 to 0x200) or by
> +	 * exiting the guest with KVM_EXIT_NMI exit reason if guest is
> +	 * FWNMI capable. For handled errors (no-fatal), just go back
> +	 * to guest execution with current HSRR0. This new approach
> +	 * injects machine check errors in guest address space to guest
> +	 * enabling guest kernel to suitably handle such errors.
>  	 *
>  	 * if we receive machine check with MSR(RI=0) then deliver it to
>  	 * guest as machine check causing guest to crash.
> @@ -2360,7 +2356,12 @@ machine_check_realmode:
>  	cmpdi	r3, 0		/* Did we handle MCE ? */
>  	bne	2f	/* Continue guest execution. */
>  	/* If not, deliver a machine check.  SRR0/1 are already set */
> -1:	li	r10, BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_MACHINE_CHECK
> +	/* Check if guest is capable of handling NMI exit */
> +1:	ld	r3, VCPU_KVM(r9)
> +	lbz	r3, KVM_FWNMI(r3)
> +	cmpdi	r3, 1       /* FWNMI capable? */
> +	beq	mc_cont
> +	li	r10, BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_MACHINE_CHECK
>  	bl	kvmppc_msr_interrupt
>  2:	b	fast_interrupt_c_return
>  
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
> index 6c9a65b..25749c6 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
> @@ -446,6 +446,16 @@ int opal_machine_check(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  	}
>  	machine_check_print_event_info(&evt);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * If regs is NULL, then the machine check exception occurred
> +	 * in the guest. Currently no action is performed in the host
> +	 * other than printing the event information. The machine check
> +	 * exception is passed on to the guest kernel and the guest
> +	 * kernel will attempt for recovery.
> +	 */
> +	if (!regs)
> +		return 0;
> +

Shouldn't the host take action for example poison bad pages?

>  	if (opal_recover_mce(regs, &evt))
>  		return 1;
>  
>

Balbir Singh 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-01-12  9:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-09 11:40 [PATCH v4 1/2] KVM: PPC: Add new capability to control MCE behaviour Aravinda Prasad
2017-01-09 11:52 ` Aravinda Prasad
2017-01-09 11:40 ` Aravinda Prasad
2017-01-09 11:40 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] KVM: PPC: Exit guest upon MCE when FWNMI capability is enabled Aravinda Prasad
2017-01-09 11:52   ` Aravinda Prasad
2017-01-12  3:16   ` David Gibson
2017-01-12  3:16     ` David Gibson
2017-01-12  3:16     ` David Gibson
2017-01-12  9:05   ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2017-01-12  9:17     ` Balbir Singh
2017-01-12 10:14     ` Aravinda Prasad
2017-01-12 10:26       ` Aravinda Prasad
2017-01-10  2:24 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] KVM: PPC: Add new capability to control MCE behaviour Balbir Singh
2017-01-10  2:36   ` Balbir Singh
2017-01-12  9:56 ` Paul Mackerras
2017-01-12  9:56   ` Paul Mackerras
2017-01-12  9:56   ` Paul Mackerras
2017-01-13  7:22   ` Aravinda Prasad
2017-01-13  7:34     ` Aravinda Prasad
2017-01-13  7:22     ` Aravinda Prasad

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170112090553.GA3006@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=aravinda@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=gleb@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.