All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>,
	geoff@infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will.deacon@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
	Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>,
	bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com, dyoung@redhat.com,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v29 3/9] arm64: kdump: reserve memory for crash dump kernel
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 17:20:44 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170117082043.GM20972@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170113113914.GB26804@leverpostej>

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 11:39:15AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 05:16:18PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 03:09:26PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > > +static int __init export_crashkernel(void)
> 
> > > > +	/* Add /chosen/linux,crashkernel-* properties */
> 
> > > > +	of_remove_property(node, of_find_property(node,
> > > > +				"linux,crashkernel-base", NULL));
> > > > +	of_remove_property(node, of_find_property(node,
> > > > +				"linux,crashkernel-size", NULL));
> > > > +
> > > > +	ret = of_add_property(node, &crash_base_prop);
> > > > +	if (ret)
> > > > +		goto ret_err;
> > > > +
> > > > +	ret = of_add_property(node, &crash_size_prop);
> > > > +	if (ret)
> > > > +		goto ret_err;
> 
> > > I very much do not like this.
> > > 
> > > I don't think we should be modifying the DT exposed to userspace in this
> > > manner, in the usual boot path, especially given that the kernel itself
> > > does not appear to be a consumer of this property. I do not think that
> > > it is right to use the DT exposed to userspace as a communication
> > > channel solely between the kernel and userspace.
> > 
> > As you mentioned in your comments against my patch#9, this property
> > originates from PPC implementation.
> > I added it solely from the sympathy for dt-based architectures.
> >
> > > So I think we should drop the above, and for arm64 have userspace
> > > consistently use /proc/iomem (or perhaps a new kexec-specific file) to
> > > determine the region reserved for the crash kernel, if it needs to know
> > > this.
> > 
> > As a matter of fact, my port of kexec-tools doesn't check this property
> > and dropping it won't cause any problem.
> 
> Ok. It sounds like we're both happy for this to go, then.
> 
> While it's unfortunate that architectures differ, I think we have
> legitimate reasons to differ, and it's preferable to do so. We have a
> different set of constraints (e.g. supporting EFI memory maps), and
> following the PPC approach creates longer term issues for us, making it
> harder to do the right thing consistently.
> 
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * reserve_crashkernel() - reserves memory for crash kernel
> > > > + *
> > > > + * This function reserves memory area given in "crashkernel=" kernel command
> > > > + * line parameter. The memory reserved is used by dump capture kernel when
> > > > + * primary kernel is crashing.
> > > > + */
> > > > +static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
> 
> > > > +	memblock_reserve(crash_base, crash_size);
> > > 
> > > This will mean that the crash kernel will have a permanent alias in the linear
> > > map which is vulnerable to being clobbered. There could also be issues
> > > with mismatched attributes in future.
> > 
> > Good point, I've never thought of that except making the memblock
> > region "reserved."
> > 
> > > We're probably ok for now, but in future we'll likely want to fix this
> > > up to remove the region (or mark it nomap), and only map it temporarily
> > > when loading things into the region.
> > 
> > Well, I found that the following commit is already in:
> >         commit 9b492cf58077
> >         Author: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>
> >         Date:   Mon May 23 16:24:10 2016 -0700
> > 
> >             kexec: introduce a protection mechanism for the crashkernel
> >             reserved memory
> > 
> > To make best use of this framework, I'd like to re-use set_memory_ro/rx()
> > instead of removing the region from linear mapping. But to do so,
> > we need to
> > * make memblock_isolate_range() global,
> > * allow set_memory_ro/rx() to be applied to regions in linear mapping
> > since set_memory_ro/rx() works only on page-level mappings.
> > 
> > What do you think?
> > (See my tentative solution below.)
> 
> Great! I think it would be better to follow the approach of
> mark_rodata_ro(), rather than opening up set_memory_*(), but otherwise,
> it looks like it should work.

I'm not quite sure what the approach of mark_rodata_ro() means, but
I found that using create_mapping_late() may cause two problems:

1) it fails when PTE_CONT bits mismatch between an old and new mmu entry.
   This can happen, say, if the memory range for crash dump kernel
   starts in the mid of _continuous_ pages.

2) The control code page, of one-page size, is still written out in
   machine_kexec() which is called at a crash, and this means that
   the range must be writable even after kexec_load(), but
   create_mapping_late() does not handle a case of changing attributes
   for a single page which is in _section_ mapping.
   We cannot make single-page mapping for the control page since the address
   of that page is not determined at the boot time.

As for (1), we need to call memblock_isolate_range() to make the region
an independent one.

> Either way, this still leaves us with an RO alias on crashed cores (and
> potential cache attribute mismatches in future). Do we need to read from
> the region later,

I believe not, but the region must be _writable_ as I mentioned in (2) above.
To avoid this issue, we have to move copying the control code page
to machine_kexec_prepare() which is called in kexec_load() and so
the region is writable anyway then.
I want Geoff to affirm that this change is safe.

(See my second solution below.)

> or could we unmap it entirely?

given the change above, I think we can.
Is there any code to re-use especially for unmapping?

Thanks,
-Takahiro AKASHI

> Thanks,
> Mark.
===8<===
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c
index c0fc3d458195..80a52e9aaf73 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c
@@ -26,8 +26,6 @@
 extern const unsigned char arm64_relocate_new_kernel[];
 extern const unsigned long arm64_relocate_new_kernel_size;
 
-static unsigned long kimage_start;
-
 /**
  * kexec_image_info - For debugging output.
  */
@@ -68,7 +66,7 @@ void machine_kexec_cleanup(struct kimage *kimage)
  */
 int machine_kexec_prepare(struct kimage *kimage)
 {
-	kimage_start = kimage->start;
+	void *reboot_code_buffer;
 
 	kexec_image_info(kimage);
 
@@ -77,6 +75,21 @@ int machine_kexec_prepare(struct kimage *kimage)
 		return -EBUSY;
 	}
 
+	reboot_code_buffer =
+			phys_to_virt(page_to_phys(kimage->control_code_page));
+
+	/*
+	 * Copy arm64_relocate_new_kernel to the reboot_code_buffer for use
+	 * after the kernel is shut down.
+	 */
+	memcpy(reboot_code_buffer, arm64_relocate_new_kernel,
+		arm64_relocate_new_kernel_size);
+
+	/* Flush the reboot_code_buffer in preparation for its execution. */
+	__flush_dcache_area(reboot_code_buffer, arm64_relocate_new_kernel_size);
+	flush_icache_range((uintptr_t)reboot_code_buffer,
+		arm64_relocate_new_kernel_size);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -147,7 +160,6 @@ static void kexec_segment_flush(const struct kimage *kimage)
 void machine_kexec(struct kimage *kimage)
 {
 	phys_addr_t reboot_code_buffer_phys;
-	void *reboot_code_buffer;
 
 	/*
 	 * New cpus may have become stuck_in_kernel after we loaded the image.
@@ -156,7 +168,6 @@ void machine_kexec(struct kimage *kimage)
 			!WARN_ON(kimage == kexec_crash_image));
 
 	reboot_code_buffer_phys = page_to_phys(kimage->control_code_page);
-	reboot_code_buffer = phys_to_virt(reboot_code_buffer_phys);
 
 	kexec_image_info(kimage);
 
@@ -164,26 +175,12 @@ void machine_kexec(struct kimage *kimage)
 		kimage->control_code_page);
 	pr_debug("%s:%d: reboot_code_buffer_phys:  %pa\n", __func__, __LINE__,
 		&reboot_code_buffer_phys);
-	pr_debug("%s:%d: reboot_code_buffer:       %p\n", __func__, __LINE__,
-		reboot_code_buffer);
 	pr_debug("%s:%d: relocate_new_kernel:      %p\n", __func__, __LINE__,
 		arm64_relocate_new_kernel);
 	pr_debug("%s:%d: relocate_new_kernel_size: 0x%lx(%lu) bytes\n",
 		__func__, __LINE__, arm64_relocate_new_kernel_size,
 		arm64_relocate_new_kernel_size);
 
-	/*
-	 * Copy arm64_relocate_new_kernel to the reboot_code_buffer for use
-	 * after the kernel is shut down.
-	 */
-	memcpy(reboot_code_buffer, arm64_relocate_new_kernel,
-		arm64_relocate_new_kernel_size);
-
-	/* Flush the reboot_code_buffer in preparation for its execution. */
-	__flush_dcache_area(reboot_code_buffer, arm64_relocate_new_kernel_size);
-	flush_icache_range((uintptr_t)reboot_code_buffer,
-		arm64_relocate_new_kernel_size);
-
 	/* Flush the kimage list and its buffers. */
 	kexec_list_flush(kimage);
 
@@ -206,7 +203,7 @@ void machine_kexec(struct kimage *kimage)
 	 */
 
 	cpu_soft_restart(kimage != kexec_crash_image,
-		reboot_code_buffer_phys, kimage->head, kimage_start, 0);
+		reboot_code_buffer_phys, kimage->head, kimage->start, 0);
 
 	BUG(); /* Should never get here. */
 }
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
index 569ec3325bc8..e4cc170edc0c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
@@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ early_param("initrd", early_initrd);
 static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
 {
 	unsigned long long crash_size, crash_base;
+	int start_rgn, end_rgn;
 	int ret;
 
 	ret = parse_crashkernel(boot_command_line, memblock_phys_mem_size(),
@@ -120,6 +121,8 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
 			return;
 		}
 	}
+	memblock_isolate_range(&memblock.memory, crash_base, crash_size,
+			&start_rgn, &end_rgn);
 	memblock_reserve(crash_base, crash_size);
 
 	pr_info("Reserving %lldMB of memory at %lldMB for crashkernel\n",
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
index 17243e43184e..b7c75845407a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/errno.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/ioport.h>
+#include <linux/kexec.h>
 #include <linux/libfdt.h>
 #include <linux/mman.h>
 #include <linux/nodemask.h>
@@ -817,3 +819,27 @@ int pmd_clear_huge(pmd_t *pmd)
 	pmd_clear(pmd);
 	return 1;
 }
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
+void arch_kexec_protect_crashkres(void)
+{
+	flush_tlb_all();
+
+	create_mapping_late(crashk_res.start, __phys_to_virt(crashk_res.start),
+			    resource_size(&crashk_res), PAGE_KERNEL_RO);
+
+	/* flush the TLBs after updating live kernel mappings */
+	flush_tlb_all();
+}
+
+void arch_kexec_unprotect_crashkres(void)
+{
+	flush_tlb_all();
+
+	create_mapping_late(crashk_res.start, __phys_to_virt(crashk_res.start),
+			    resource_size(&crashk_res), PAGE_KERNEL);
+
+	/* flush the TLBs after updating live kernel mappings */
+	flush_tlb_all();
+}
+#endif
===>8===

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: takahiro.akashi@linaro.org (AKASHI Takahiro)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v29 3/9] arm64: kdump: reserve memory for crash dump kernel
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 17:20:44 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170117082043.GM20972@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170113113914.GB26804@leverpostej>

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 11:39:15AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 05:16:18PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 03:09:26PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > > +static int __init export_crashkernel(void)
> 
> > > > +	/* Add /chosen/linux,crashkernel-* properties */
> 
> > > > +	of_remove_property(node, of_find_property(node,
> > > > +				"linux,crashkernel-base", NULL));
> > > > +	of_remove_property(node, of_find_property(node,
> > > > +				"linux,crashkernel-size", NULL));
> > > > +
> > > > +	ret = of_add_property(node, &crash_base_prop);
> > > > +	if (ret)
> > > > +		goto ret_err;
> > > > +
> > > > +	ret = of_add_property(node, &crash_size_prop);
> > > > +	if (ret)
> > > > +		goto ret_err;
> 
> > > I very much do not like this.
> > > 
> > > I don't think we should be modifying the DT exposed to userspace in this
> > > manner, in the usual boot path, especially given that the kernel itself
> > > does not appear to be a consumer of this property. I do not think that
> > > it is right to use the DT exposed to userspace as a communication
> > > channel solely between the kernel and userspace.
> > 
> > As you mentioned in your comments against my patch#9, this property
> > originates from PPC implementation.
> > I added it solely from the sympathy for dt-based architectures.
> >
> > > So I think we should drop the above, and for arm64 have userspace
> > > consistently use /proc/iomem (or perhaps a new kexec-specific file) to
> > > determine the region reserved for the crash kernel, if it needs to know
> > > this.
> > 
> > As a matter of fact, my port of kexec-tools doesn't check this property
> > and dropping it won't cause any problem.
> 
> Ok. It sounds like we're both happy for this to go, then.
> 
> While it's unfortunate that architectures differ, I think we have
> legitimate reasons to differ, and it's preferable to do so. We have a
> different set of constraints (e.g. supporting EFI memory maps), and
> following the PPC approach creates longer term issues for us, making it
> harder to do the right thing consistently.
> 
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * reserve_crashkernel() - reserves memory for crash kernel
> > > > + *
> > > > + * This function reserves memory area given in "crashkernel=" kernel command
> > > > + * line parameter. The memory reserved is used by dump capture kernel when
> > > > + * primary kernel is crashing.
> > > > + */
> > > > +static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
> 
> > > > +	memblock_reserve(crash_base, crash_size);
> > > 
> > > This will mean that the crash kernel will have a permanent alias in the linear
> > > map which is vulnerable to being clobbered. There could also be issues
> > > with mismatched attributes in future.
> > 
> > Good point, I've never thought of that except making the memblock
> > region "reserved."
> > 
> > > We're probably ok for now, but in future we'll likely want to fix this
> > > up to remove the region (or mark it nomap), and only map it temporarily
> > > when loading things into the region.
> > 
> > Well, I found that the following commit is already in:
> >         commit 9b492cf58077
> >         Author: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>
> >         Date:   Mon May 23 16:24:10 2016 -0700
> > 
> >             kexec: introduce a protection mechanism for the crashkernel
> >             reserved memory
> > 
> > To make best use of this framework, I'd like to re-use set_memory_ro/rx()
> > instead of removing the region from linear mapping. But to do so,
> > we need to
> > * make memblock_isolate_range() global,
> > * allow set_memory_ro/rx() to be applied to regions in linear mapping
> > since set_memory_ro/rx() works only on page-level mappings.
> > 
> > What do you think?
> > (See my tentative solution below.)
> 
> Great! I think it would be better to follow the approach of
> mark_rodata_ro(), rather than opening up set_memory_*(), but otherwise,
> it looks like it should work.

I'm not quite sure what the approach of mark_rodata_ro() means, but
I found that using create_mapping_late() may cause two problems:

1) it fails when PTE_CONT bits mismatch between an old and new mmu entry.
   This can happen, say, if the memory range for crash dump kernel
   starts in the mid of _continuous_ pages.

2) The control code page, of one-page size, is still written out in
   machine_kexec() which is called at a crash, and this means that
   the range must be writable even after kexec_load(), but
   create_mapping_late() does not handle a case of changing attributes
   for a single page which is in _section_ mapping.
   We cannot make single-page mapping for the control page since the address
   of that page is not determined at the boot time.

As for (1), we need to call memblock_isolate_range() to make the region
an independent one.

> Either way, this still leaves us with an RO alias on crashed cores (and
> potential cache attribute mismatches in future). Do we need to read from
> the region later,

I believe not, but the region must be _writable_ as I mentioned in (2) above.
To avoid this issue, we have to move copying the control code page
to machine_kexec_prepare() which is called in kexec_load() and so
the region is writable anyway then.
I want Geoff to affirm that this change is safe.

(See my second solution below.)

> or could we unmap it entirely?

given the change above, I think we can.
Is there any code to re-use especially for unmapping?

Thanks,
-Takahiro AKASHI

> Thanks,
> Mark.
===8<===
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c
index c0fc3d458195..80a52e9aaf73 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c
@@ -26,8 +26,6 @@
 extern const unsigned char arm64_relocate_new_kernel[];
 extern const unsigned long arm64_relocate_new_kernel_size;
 
-static unsigned long kimage_start;
-
 /**
  * kexec_image_info - For debugging output.
  */
@@ -68,7 +66,7 @@ void machine_kexec_cleanup(struct kimage *kimage)
  */
 int machine_kexec_prepare(struct kimage *kimage)
 {
-	kimage_start = kimage->start;
+	void *reboot_code_buffer;
 
 	kexec_image_info(kimage);
 
@@ -77,6 +75,21 @@ int machine_kexec_prepare(struct kimage *kimage)
 		return -EBUSY;
 	}
 
+	reboot_code_buffer =
+			phys_to_virt(page_to_phys(kimage->control_code_page));
+
+	/*
+	 * Copy arm64_relocate_new_kernel to the reboot_code_buffer for use
+	 * after the kernel is shut down.
+	 */
+	memcpy(reboot_code_buffer, arm64_relocate_new_kernel,
+		arm64_relocate_new_kernel_size);
+
+	/* Flush the reboot_code_buffer in preparation for its execution. */
+	__flush_dcache_area(reboot_code_buffer, arm64_relocate_new_kernel_size);
+	flush_icache_range((uintptr_t)reboot_code_buffer,
+		arm64_relocate_new_kernel_size);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -147,7 +160,6 @@ static void kexec_segment_flush(const struct kimage *kimage)
 void machine_kexec(struct kimage *kimage)
 {
 	phys_addr_t reboot_code_buffer_phys;
-	void *reboot_code_buffer;
 
 	/*
 	 * New cpus may have become stuck_in_kernel after we loaded the image.
@@ -156,7 +168,6 @@ void machine_kexec(struct kimage *kimage)
 			!WARN_ON(kimage == kexec_crash_image));
 
 	reboot_code_buffer_phys = page_to_phys(kimage->control_code_page);
-	reboot_code_buffer = phys_to_virt(reboot_code_buffer_phys);
 
 	kexec_image_info(kimage);
 
@@ -164,26 +175,12 @@ void machine_kexec(struct kimage *kimage)
 		kimage->control_code_page);
 	pr_debug("%s:%d: reboot_code_buffer_phys:  %pa\n", __func__, __LINE__,
 		&reboot_code_buffer_phys);
-	pr_debug("%s:%d: reboot_code_buffer:       %p\n", __func__, __LINE__,
-		reboot_code_buffer);
 	pr_debug("%s:%d: relocate_new_kernel:      %p\n", __func__, __LINE__,
 		arm64_relocate_new_kernel);
 	pr_debug("%s:%d: relocate_new_kernel_size: 0x%lx(%lu) bytes\n",
 		__func__, __LINE__, arm64_relocate_new_kernel_size,
 		arm64_relocate_new_kernel_size);
 
-	/*
-	 * Copy arm64_relocate_new_kernel to the reboot_code_buffer for use
-	 * after the kernel is shut down.
-	 */
-	memcpy(reboot_code_buffer, arm64_relocate_new_kernel,
-		arm64_relocate_new_kernel_size);
-
-	/* Flush the reboot_code_buffer in preparation for its execution. */
-	__flush_dcache_area(reboot_code_buffer, arm64_relocate_new_kernel_size);
-	flush_icache_range((uintptr_t)reboot_code_buffer,
-		arm64_relocate_new_kernel_size);
-
 	/* Flush the kimage list and its buffers. */
 	kexec_list_flush(kimage);
 
@@ -206,7 +203,7 @@ void machine_kexec(struct kimage *kimage)
 	 */
 
 	cpu_soft_restart(kimage != kexec_crash_image,
-		reboot_code_buffer_phys, kimage->head, kimage_start, 0);
+		reboot_code_buffer_phys, kimage->head, kimage->start, 0);
 
 	BUG(); /* Should never get here. */
 }
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
index 569ec3325bc8..e4cc170edc0c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
@@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ early_param("initrd", early_initrd);
 static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
 {
 	unsigned long long crash_size, crash_base;
+	int start_rgn, end_rgn;
 	int ret;
 
 	ret = parse_crashkernel(boot_command_line, memblock_phys_mem_size(),
@@ -120,6 +121,8 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
 			return;
 		}
 	}
+	memblock_isolate_range(&memblock.memory, crash_base, crash_size,
+			&start_rgn, &end_rgn);
 	memblock_reserve(crash_base, crash_size);
 
 	pr_info("Reserving %lldMB of memory at %lldMB for crashkernel\n",
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
index 17243e43184e..b7c75845407a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/errno.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/ioport.h>
+#include <linux/kexec.h>
 #include <linux/libfdt.h>
 #include <linux/mman.h>
 #include <linux/nodemask.h>
@@ -817,3 +819,27 @@ int pmd_clear_huge(pmd_t *pmd)
 	pmd_clear(pmd);
 	return 1;
 }
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
+void arch_kexec_protect_crashkres(void)
+{
+	flush_tlb_all();
+
+	create_mapping_late(crashk_res.start, __phys_to_virt(crashk_res.start),
+			    resource_size(&crashk_res), PAGE_KERNEL_RO);
+
+	/* flush the TLBs after updating live kernel mappings */
+	flush_tlb_all();
+}
+
+void arch_kexec_unprotect_crashkres(void)
+{
+	flush_tlb_all();
+
+	create_mapping_late(crashk_res.start, __phys_to_virt(crashk_res.start),
+			    resource_size(&crashk_res), PAGE_KERNEL);
+
+	/* flush the TLBs after updating live kernel mappings */
+	flush_tlb_all();
+}
+#endif
===>8===

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-17  8:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-28  4:33 [PATCH v29 0/9] arm64: add kdump support AKASHI Takahiro
2016-12-28  4:33 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-12-28  4:35 ` [PATCH v29 1/9] memblock: add memblock_cap_memory_range() AKASHI Takahiro
2016-12-28  4:35   ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-12-28  4:35   ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-10 11:16   ` Will Deacon
2017-01-10 11:16     ` Will Deacon
2017-01-10 11:16     ` Will Deacon
2017-01-11  1:57     ` Dennis Chen
2017-01-11  1:57       ` Dennis Chen
2017-01-11  1:57       ` Dennis Chen
2016-12-28  4:35 ` [PATCH v29 2/9] arm64: limit memory regions based on DT property, usable-memory-range AKASHI Takahiro
2016-12-28  4:35   ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-12-28  4:36 ` [PATCH v29 3/9] arm64: kdump: reserve memory for crash dump kernel AKASHI Takahiro
2016-12-28  4:36   ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-12 15:09   ` Mark Rutland
2017-01-12 15:09     ` Mark Rutland
2017-01-13  8:16     ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-13  8:16       ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-13 11:39       ` Mark Rutland
2017-01-13 11:39         ` Mark Rutland
2017-01-17  8:20         ` AKASHI Takahiro [this message]
2017-01-17  8:20           ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-17 11:54           ` Mark Rutland
2017-01-17 11:54             ` Mark Rutland
2017-01-19  9:49             ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-19  9:49               ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-19 11:28               ` Mark Rutland
2017-01-19 11:28                 ` Mark Rutland
2017-01-23  9:51                 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-23  9:51                   ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-23 10:23                   ` Mark Rutland
2017-01-23 10:23                     ` Mark Rutland
2017-01-24  7:55                     ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-24  7:55                       ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-12-28  4:36 ` [PATCH v29 4/9] arm64: kdump: implement machine_crash_shutdown() AKASHI Takahiro
2016-12-28  4:36   ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-10 11:32   ` Will Deacon
2017-01-10 11:32     ` Will Deacon
2017-01-11  6:36     ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-11  6:36       ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-11 10:54       ` Will Deacon
2017-01-11 10:54         ` Will Deacon
2017-01-12  4:21         ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-12  4:21           ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-12 12:01           ` Will Deacon
2017-01-12 12:01             ` Will Deacon
2017-01-23 17:46             ` Will Deacon
2017-01-23 17:46               ` Will Deacon
2017-01-24  7:52               ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-24  7:52                 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-12-28  4:36 ` [PATCH v29 5/9] arm64: kdump: add VMCOREINFO's for user-space tools AKASHI Takahiro
2016-12-28  4:36   ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-12-28  4:36 ` [PATCH v29 6/9] arm64: kdump: provide /proc/vmcore file AKASHI Takahiro
2016-12-28  4:36   ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-12-28  4:36 ` [PATCH v29 7/9] arm64: kdump: enable kdump in defconfig AKASHI Takahiro
2016-12-28  4:36   ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-12-28  4:36 ` [PATCH v29 8/9] Documentation: kdump: describe arm64 port AKASHI Takahiro
2016-12-28  4:36   ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-12-28  4:37 ` [PATCH v29 9/9] Documentation: dt: chosen properties for arm64 kdump AKASHI Takahiro
2016-12-28  4:37   ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-12-28  4:37   ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-10 11:10   ` Will Deacon
2017-01-10 11:10     ` Will Deacon
2017-01-10 11:10     ` Will Deacon
2017-01-12 15:39   ` Mark Rutland
2017-01-12 15:39     ` Mark Rutland
2017-01-12 15:39     ` Mark Rutland
2017-01-13  9:13     ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-13  9:13       ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-13  9:13       ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-13 11:17       ` Mark Rutland
2017-01-13 11:17         ` Mark Rutland
2017-01-13 11:17         ` Mark Rutland
2017-01-16  8:25         ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-16  8:25           ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-16  8:25           ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-17  8:26           ` Dave Young
2017-01-17  8:26             ` Dave Young
2017-01-17  8:26             ` Dave Young
2017-01-19  9:01             ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-19  9:01               ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-19  9:01               ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-17 11:13           ` Mark Rutland
2017-01-17 11:13             ` Mark Rutland
2017-01-17 11:13             ` Mark Rutland
2017-01-06  3:26 ` [PATCH v29 0/9] arm64: add kdump support Pratyush Anand
2017-01-06  3:26   ` Pratyush Anand
2017-01-06  4:34   ` AKASHI Takahiro
2017-01-06  4:34     ` AKASHI Takahiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170117082043.GM20972@linaro.org \
    --to=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
    --cc=bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=geoff@infradead.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=msalter@redhat.com \
    --cc=panand@redhat.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.