From: afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com (Afzal Mohammed)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] ARM: nommu: dynamic exception base address setting
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 21:50:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170120162022.GB3865@afzalpc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f47f7a48-12e9-7dd0-324d-b736eead3187@arm.com>
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 01:59:09PM +0000, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> On 18/01/17 20:38, afzal mohammed wrote:
> > +#define ID_PFR1_SE (0x3 << 4) /* Security extension enable bits */
>
> This bitfiled is 4 bits wide.
Since only 2 LSb's out of the 4 were enough to detect whether security
extensions were enabled, it was done so. i am going to use your below
suggestion & this would be taken care by that.
> > + if (security_extensions_enabled()) {
>
> You can use
>
> cpuid_feature_extract(CPUID_EXT_PFR1, 4)
>
> and add a comment explaining what we are looking for and why.
Yes, that is better, was not aware of this, did saw CPUID_EXT_PFR1 as
an unused macro.
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_CP15
> > + vectors_base = setup_vectors_base();
> > +#endif
>
> alternatively it can be
>
> unsigned long vector_base = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_CP15) ? setup_vbar() : 0;
Yes that certainly is better.
Regards
afzal
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Afzal Mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com>
To: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ARM: nommu: dynamic exception base address setting
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 21:50:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170120162022.GB3865@afzalpc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f47f7a48-12e9-7dd0-324d-b736eead3187@arm.com>
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 01:59:09PM +0000, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> On 18/01/17 20:38, afzal mohammed wrote:
> > +#define ID_PFR1_SE (0x3 << 4) /* Security extension enable bits */
>
> This bitfiled is 4 bits wide.
Since only 2 LSb's out of the 4 were enough to detect whether security
extensions were enabled, it was done so. i am going to use your below
suggestion & this would be taken care by that.
> > + if (security_extensions_enabled()) {
>
> You can use
>
> cpuid_feature_extract(CPUID_EXT_PFR1, 4)
>
> and add a comment explaining what we are looking for and why.
Yes, that is better, was not aware of this, did saw CPUID_EXT_PFR1 as
an unused macro.
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_CP15
> > + vectors_base = setup_vectors_base();
> > +#endif
>
> alternatively it can be
>
> unsigned long vector_base = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_CP15) ? setup_vbar() : 0;
Yes that certainly is better.
Regards
afzal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-20 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-18 20:35 [PATCH 0/4] ARM: v7-A !MMU support, CONFIG_VECTORS_BASE removal (almost) afzal mohammed
2017-01-18 20:35 ` afzal mohammed
2017-01-18 20:37 ` [PATCH 1/4] ARM: mmu: decouple VECTORS_BASE from Kconfig afzal mohammed
2017-01-18 20:37 ` afzal mohammed
2017-01-19 13:21 ` Afzal Mohammed
2017-01-19 13:21 ` Afzal Mohammed
2017-01-19 14:07 ` kbuild test robot
2017-01-19 14:07 ` kbuild test robot
2017-01-19 14:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-01-19 14:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-01-20 16:06 ` Afzal Mohammed
2017-01-20 16:06 ` Afzal Mohammed
2017-01-22 3:27 ` Afzal Mohammed
2017-01-22 3:27 ` Afzal Mohammed
2017-01-18 20:38 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: nommu: dynamic exception base address setting afzal mohammed
2017-01-18 20:38 ` afzal mohammed
2017-01-19 13:59 ` Vladimir Murzin
2017-01-19 13:59 ` Vladimir Murzin
2017-01-20 16:20 ` Afzal Mohammed [this message]
2017-01-20 16:20 ` Afzal Mohammed
2017-01-22 3:37 ` Afzal Mohammed
2017-01-22 3:37 ` Afzal Mohammed
2017-01-18 20:38 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: nommu: display vectors base afzal mohammed
2017-01-18 20:38 ` afzal mohammed
2017-01-18 22:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-01-18 22:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-01-19 13:16 ` Afzal Mohammed
2017-01-19 13:16 ` Afzal Mohammed
2017-01-30 12:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-01-30 12:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-01-18 20:39 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: nommu: remove Hivecs configuration is asm afzal mohammed
2017-01-18 20:39 ` afzal mohammed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170120162022.GB3865@afzalpc \
--to=afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.