* [patch] samples/bpf: silence shift wrapping warning @ 2017-01-21 4:51 ` Dan Carpenter 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Dan Carpenter @ 2017-01-21 4:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Thomas Graf Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Joe Stringer, David S. Miller, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors max_key is a value in the 0-63 range, so on 32 bit systems the shift could wrap. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> diff --git a/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c b/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c index ec8f3bb..bd06eef 100644 --- a/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c +++ b/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) for (i = 1; i <= max_key + 1; i++) { stars(starstr, data[i - 1], max_value, MAX_STARS); printf("%8ld -> %-8ld : %-8ld |%-*s|\n", - (1l << i) >> 1, (1l << i) - 1, data[i - 1], + (1ULL << i) >> 1, (1ULL << i) - 1, data[i - 1], MAX_STARS, starstr); } ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [patch] samples/bpf: silence shift wrapping warning @ 2017-01-21 4:51 ` Dan Carpenter 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Dan Carpenter @ 2017-01-21 4:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Thomas Graf Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Joe Stringer, David S. Miller, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors max_key is a value in the 0-63 range, so on 32 bit systems the shift could wrap. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> diff --git a/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c b/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c index ec8f3bb..bd06eef 100644 --- a/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c +++ b/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) for (i = 1; i <= max_key + 1; i++) { stars(starstr, data[i - 1], max_value, MAX_STARS); printf("%8ld -> %-8ld : %-8ld |%-*s|\n", - (1l << i) >> 1, (1l << i) - 1, data[i - 1], + (1ULL << i) >> 1, (1ULL << i) - 1, data[i - 1], MAX_STARS, starstr); } ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] samples/bpf: silence shift wrapping warning 2017-01-21 4:51 ` Dan Carpenter @ 2017-01-22 22:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov -1 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Alexei Starovoitov @ 2017-01-22 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Thomas Graf, Alexei Starovoitov, Joe Stringer, David S. Miller, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors, netdev On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 07:51:43AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > max_key is a value in the 0-63 range, so on 32 bit systems the shift > could wrap. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Looks fine. I think 'net-next' is ok. Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> > diff --git a/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c b/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c > index ec8f3bb..bd06eef 100644 > --- a/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c > +++ b/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c > @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) > for (i = 1; i <= max_key + 1; i++) { > stars(starstr, data[i - 1], max_value, MAX_STARS); > printf("%8ld -> %-8ld : %-8ld |%-*s|\n", > - (1l << i) >> 1, (1l << i) - 1, data[i - 1], > + (1ULL << i) >> 1, (1ULL << i) - 1, data[i - 1], > MAX_STARS, starstr); > } > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] samples/bpf: silence shift wrapping warning @ 2017-01-22 22:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Alexei Starovoitov @ 2017-01-22 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Thomas Graf, Alexei Starovoitov, Joe Stringer, David S. Miller, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors, netdev On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 07:51:43AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > max_key is a value in the 0-63 range, so on 32 bit systems the shift > could wrap. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Looks fine. I think 'net-next' is ok. Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> > diff --git a/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c b/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c > index ec8f3bb..bd06eef 100644 > --- a/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c > +++ b/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c > @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) > for (i = 1; i <= max_key + 1; i++) { > stars(starstr, data[i - 1], max_value, MAX_STARS); > printf("%8ld -> %-8ld : %-8ld |%-*s|\n", > - (1l << i) >> 1, (1l << i) - 1, data[i - 1], > + (1ULL << i) >> 1, (1ULL << i) - 1, data[i - 1], > MAX_STARS, starstr); > } > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] samples/bpf: silence shift wrapping warning 2017-01-22 22:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov @ 2017-01-23 13:27 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo -1 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2017-01-23 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Dan Carpenter, Thomas Graf, Alexei Starovoitov, Joe Stringer, David S. Miller, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors, netdev Em Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 02:51:25PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov escreveu: > On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 07:51:43AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > max_key is a value in the 0-63 range, so on 32 bit systems the shift > > could wrap. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> > > Looks fine. I think 'net-next' is ok. I could process these patches, if that would help, - Arnaldo > Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> > > diff --git a/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c b/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c > > index ec8f3bb..bd06eef 100644 > > --- a/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c > > +++ b/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c > > @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) > > for (i = 1; i <= max_key + 1; i++) { > > stars(starstr, data[i - 1], max_value, MAX_STARS); > > printf("%8ld -> %-8ld : %-8ld |%-*s|\n", > > - (1l << i) >> 1, (1l << i) - 1, data[i - 1], > > + (1ULL << i) >> 1, (1ULL << i) - 1, data[i - 1], > > MAX_STARS, starstr); > > } > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] samples/bpf: silence shift wrapping warning @ 2017-01-23 13:27 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2017-01-23 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Dan Carpenter, Thomas Graf, Alexei Starovoitov, Joe Stringer, David S. Miller, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors, netdev Em Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 02:51:25PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov escreveu: > On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 07:51:43AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > max_key is a value in the 0-63 range, so on 32 bit systems the shift > > could wrap. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> > > Looks fine. I think 'net-next' is ok. I could process these patches, if that would help, - Arnaldo > Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> > > diff --git a/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c b/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c > > index ec8f3bb..bd06eef 100644 > > --- a/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c > > +++ b/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c > > @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) > > for (i = 1; i <= max_key + 1; i++) { > > stars(starstr, data[i - 1], max_value, MAX_STARS); > > printf("%8ld -> %-8ld : %-8ld |%-*s|\n", > > - (1l << i) >> 1, (1l << i) - 1, data[i - 1], > > + (1ULL << i) >> 1, (1ULL << i) - 1, data[i - 1], > > MAX_STARS, starstr); > > } > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* RE: [patch] samples/bpf: silence shift wrapping warning 2017-01-22 22:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov (?) (?) @ 2017-01-25 11:08 ` David Laight -1 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: David Laight @ 2017-01-25 11:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'Alexei Starovoitov', Dan Carpenter Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Thomas Graf, Alexei Starovoitov, Joe Stringer, David S. Miller, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org From: Alexei Starovoitov > Sent: 22 January 2017 22:51 > On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 07:51:43AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > max_key is a value in the 0-63 range, so on 32 bit systems the shift > > could wrap. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> > > Looks fine. I think 'net-next' is ok. > > Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> > > > diff --git a/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c b/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c > > index ec8f3bb..bd06eef 100644 > > --- a/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c > > +++ b/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c > > @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) > > for (i = 1; i <= max_key + 1; i++) { > > stars(starstr, data[i - 1], max_value, MAX_STARS); > > printf("%8ld -> %-8ld : %-8ld |%-*s|\n", > > - (1l << i) >> 1, (1l << i) - 1, data[i - 1], > > + (1ULL << i) >> 1, (1ULL << i) - 1, data[i - 1], > > MAX_STARS, starstr); > > } The format effectors are wrong on 32bit systems. David ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] samples/bpf: silence shift wrapping warning @ 2017-01-24 6:44 ` Alexei Starovoitov 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Alexei Starovoitov @ 2017-01-24 6:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Dan Carpenter, Thomas Graf, Alexei Starovoitov, Joe Stringer, David S. Miller, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors, netdev@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com> wrote: > Em Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 02:51:25PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov escreveu: >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 07:51:43AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: >> > max_key is a value in the 0-63 range, so on 32 bit systems the shift >> > could wrap. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> >> >> Looks fine. I think 'net-next' is ok. > > I could process these patches, if that would help, Thanks for the offer. I don't think there will be conflicts with all the work happening in net-next, but it's best to avoid even possibility of it when we can. Dan, can you please resend the patch cc-ing Dave and netdev ? please mention [PATCH net-next] in the subject. > - Arnaldo > >> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> > >> > diff --git a/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c b/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c >> > index ec8f3bb..bd06eef 100644 >> > --- a/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c >> > +++ b/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c >> > @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) >> > for (i = 1; i <= max_key + 1; i++) { >> > stars(starstr, data[i - 1], max_value, MAX_STARS); >> > printf("%8ld -> %-8ld : %-8ld |%-*s|\n", >> > - (1l << i) >> 1, (1l << i) - 1, data[i - 1], >> > + (1ULL << i) >> 1, (1ULL << i) - 1, data[i - 1], >> > MAX_STARS, starstr); >> > } >> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] samples/bpf: silence shift wrapping warning @ 2017-01-24 6:44 ` Alexei Starovoitov 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Alexei Starovoitov @ 2017-01-24 6:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Dan Carpenter, Thomas Graf, Alexei Starovoitov, Joe Stringer, David S. Miller, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors, netdev@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com> wrote: > Em Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 02:51:25PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov escreveu: >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 07:51:43AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: >> > max_key is a value in the 0-63 range, so on 32 bit systems the shift >> > could wrap. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> >> >> Looks fine. I think 'net-next' is ok. > > I could process these patches, if that would help, Thanks for the offer. I don't think there will be conflicts with all the work happening in net-next, but it's best to avoid even possibility of it when we can. Dan, can you please resend the patch cc-ing Dave and netdev ? please mention [PATCH net-next] in the subject. > - Arnaldo > >> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> > >> > diff --git a/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c b/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c >> > index ec8f3bb..bd06eef 100644 >> > --- a/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c >> > +++ b/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c >> > @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) >> > for (i = 1; i <= max_key + 1; i++) { >> > stars(starstr, data[i - 1], max_value, MAX_STARS); >> > printf("%8ld -> %-8ld : %-8ld |%-*s|\n", >> > - (1l << i) >> 1, (1l << i) - 1, data[i - 1], >> > + (1ULL << i) >> 1, (1ULL << i) - 1, data[i - 1], >> > MAX_STARS, starstr); >> > } >> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] samples/bpf: silence shift wrapping warning 2017-01-24 6:44 ` Alexei Starovoitov @ 2017-01-24 8:46 ` Dan Carpenter -1 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Dan Carpenter @ 2017-01-24 8:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Thomas Graf, Alexei Starovoitov, Joe Stringer, David S. Miller, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors, netdev@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:44:34PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com> wrote: > > Em Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 02:51:25PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov escreveu: > >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 07:51:43AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > >> > max_key is a value in the 0-63 range, so on 32 bit systems the shift > >> > could wrap. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> > >> > >> Looks fine. I think 'net-next' is ok. > > > > I could process these patches, if that would help, > > Thanks for the offer. > I don't think there will be conflicts with all the work happening in net-next, > but it's best to avoid even possibility of it when we can. > Dan, > can you please resend the patch cc-ing Dave and netdev ? > please mention [PATCH net-next] in the subject. > Sure. regards, dan carpenter ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] samples/bpf: silence shift wrapping warning @ 2017-01-24 8:46 ` Dan Carpenter 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Dan Carpenter @ 2017-01-24 8:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Thomas Graf, Alexei Starovoitov, Joe Stringer, David S. Miller, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors, netdev@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:44:34PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com> wrote: > > Em Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 02:51:25PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov escreveu: > >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 07:51:43AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > >> > max_key is a value in the 0-63 range, so on 32 bit systems the shift > >> > could wrap. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> > >> > >> Looks fine. I think 'net-next' is ok. > > > > I could process these patches, if that would help, > > Thanks for the offer. > I don't think there will be conflicts with all the work happening in net-next, > but it's best to avoid even possibility of it when we can. > Dan, > can you please resend the patch cc-ing Dave and netdev ? > please mention [PATCH net-next] in the subject. > Sure. regards, dan carpenter ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] samples/bpf: silence shift wrapping warning 2017-01-24 6:44 ` Alexei Starovoitov @ 2017-01-24 16:02 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo -1 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2017-01-24 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Dan Carpenter, Thomas Graf, Alexei Starovoitov, Joe Stringer, David S. Miller, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors, netdev@vger.kernel.org Em Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:44:34PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov escreveu: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com> wrote: > > Em Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 02:51:25PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov escreveu: > >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 07:51:43AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > >> > max_key is a value in the 0-63 range, so on 32 bit systems the shift > >> > could wrap. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> > >> > >> Looks fine. I think 'net-next' is ok. > > > > I could process these patches, if that would help, > > Thanks for the offer. > I don't think there will be conflicts with all the work happening in net-next, > but it's best to avoid even possibility of it when we can. Okay sir, I'll let you know when/if the tests I perform building samples/bpf/ in my containers catch something, - Arnaldo > Dan, > can you please resend the patch cc-ing Dave and netdev ? > please mention [PATCH net-next] in the subject. > > > - Arnaldo > > > >> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> > > > >> > diff --git a/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c b/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c > >> > index ec8f3bb..bd06eef 100644 > >> > --- a/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c > >> > +++ b/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c > >> > @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) > >> > for (i = 1; i <= max_key + 1; i++) { > >> > stars(starstr, data[i - 1], max_value, MAX_STARS); > >> > printf("%8ld -> %-8ld : %-8ld |%-*s|\n", > >> > - (1l << i) >> 1, (1l << i) - 1, data[i - 1], > >> > + (1ULL << i) >> 1, (1ULL << i) - 1, data[i - 1], > >> > MAX_STARS, starstr); > >> > } > >> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] samples/bpf: silence shift wrapping warning @ 2017-01-24 16:02 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2017-01-24 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Dan Carpenter, Thomas Graf, Alexei Starovoitov, Joe Stringer, David S. Miller, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors, netdev@vger.kernel.org Em Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:44:34PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov escreveu: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com> wrote: > > Em Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 02:51:25PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov escreveu: > >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 07:51:43AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > >> > max_key is a value in the 0-63 range, so on 32 bit systems the shift > >> > could wrap. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> > >> > >> Looks fine. I think 'net-next' is ok. > > > > I could process these patches, if that would help, > > Thanks for the offer. > I don't think there will be conflicts with all the work happening in net-next, > but it's best to avoid even possibility of it when we can. Okay sir, I'll let you know when/if the tests I perform building samples/bpf/ in my containers catch something, - Arnaldo > Dan, > can you please resend the patch cc-ing Dave and netdev ? > please mention [PATCH net-next] in the subject. > > > - Arnaldo > > > >> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> > > > >> > diff --git a/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c b/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c > >> > index ec8f3bb..bd06eef 100644 > >> > --- a/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c > >> > +++ b/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c > >> > @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) > >> > for (i = 1; i <= max_key + 1; i++) { > >> > stars(starstr, data[i - 1], max_value, MAX_STARS); > >> > printf("%8ld -> %-8ld : %-8ld |%-*s|\n", > >> > - (1l << i) >> 1, (1l << i) - 1, data[i - 1], > >> > + (1ULL << i) >> 1, (1ULL << i) - 1, data[i - 1], > >> > MAX_STARS, starstr); > >> > } > >> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-01-25 11:08 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2017-01-21 4:51 [patch] samples/bpf: silence shift wrapping warning Dan Carpenter 2017-01-21 4:51 ` Dan Carpenter 2017-01-22 22:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov 2017-01-22 22:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov 2017-01-23 13:27 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2017-01-23 13:27 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2017-01-25 11:08 ` David Laight 2017-01-24 6:44 ` Alexei Starovoitov 2017-01-24 6:44 ` Alexei Starovoitov 2017-01-24 8:46 ` Dan Carpenter 2017-01-24 8:46 ` Dan Carpenter 2017-01-24 16:02 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2017-01-24 16:02 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.