From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, darrick.wong@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: go straight to real allocations for direct I/O COW writes
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 14:59:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170124135937.GA25885@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170124135044.GA60234@bfoster.bfoster>
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 08:50:45AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> Is this reproducible on the current tree or only with this patch series?
It's only reproducible with the series modified to your review comments.
> Also, shouldn't the end_io handler only remap the range of the write,
> regardless of whether the initial allocation ended up preallocating over
> holes or purely a shared range?
The end_io handler is caller for the whole size of the write. That's
mostly because we don't have an object corresponding to a write_begin
call.
> Perhaps what you are saying here is that we have a single dio write that
> spans wider than a shared data fork extent..?
Yes.
> In that case, we iterate
> the range in xfs_reflink_reserve_cow(). We'd skip the start of the range
> that is a hole in the data fork, but as you say, the
> xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc() call for the part of the I/O on the shared
> extent can widen the COW fork allocation to before the extent in the
> data fork, possibly to before the start of the I/O. (Thus we end up
> allocating COW blocks over the hole anyways...).
The problem is the following.
We have a file with the following layout
HHHHHHHHHHHHDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
where H is hole and D is data. The H to D boundary is not aligned
to the cowextsize.
The direct I/O code now does a first pass allocating an extent for
H and copies data to it. Then in the next step it goes on to D
and unshares it. It then enlarges the extent into the end of the
previously H range. It does however not copy data into H again,
as the iomap iterator is past it. The ->end_io routine however
is called for the hole range, and will move the just allocated
rounding before H back into the data fork, replacing the valid data
writtent just before.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-24 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-05 21:05 reflink COW improvements Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-05 21:05 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: reject all unaligned direct writes to reflinked files Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-07 18:59 ` Brian Foster
2016-12-05 21:05 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: go straight to real allocations for direct I/O COW writes Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-07 19:00 ` Brian Foster
2016-12-07 19:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-07 19:46 ` Brian Foster
2016-12-08 4:23 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-01-24 8:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-24 13:50 ` Brian Foster
2017-01-24 13:59 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-01-24 15:02 ` Brian Foster
2017-01-24 15:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-24 16:17 ` Brian Foster
2017-01-24 16:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-24 17:43 ` Brian Foster
2017-01-24 20:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-24 20:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-25 0:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-01-27 17:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-01-27 17:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-05 21:05 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: allocate direct I/O COW blocks in iomap_begin Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-06 2:09 ` reflink COW improvements Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170124135937.GA25885@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.