All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, darrick.wong@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: go straight to real allocations for direct I/O COW writes
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 21:08:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170124200855.GA1385@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170124174318.GH60234@bfoster.bfoster>

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:43:18PM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> Hmm, that's not what I'm seeing (not that it really matters, but I'm
> curious if I'm missing something):

Yeah, I can reproduce this on mainline.  Turns out the it was done
by the align call in xfs_bmap_btalloc that even my before run had
removed.

Took me some time to spin my head around this.

Btw, I think we have a nasty race in the current DIO code that might
expose stale data, but this is just the same kind of head spinning
exercise for now:

Thread 1 writes a range from B to c

                    B --------- C

a little later thread 2 writes from A to B

        A --------- B

but the code preallocates beyond B into the range where thread
1 has just written, but ->end_io hasn't been called yet.
But once ->end_io is called thread 2 has already allocated
up to the extent size hint into the write range of thread 1,
so the end_io handler will splice the unintialized blocks from
that preallocation back into the file right after B.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-24 20:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-05 21:05 reflink COW improvements Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-05 21:05 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: reject all unaligned direct writes to reflinked files Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-07 18:59   ` Brian Foster
2016-12-05 21:05 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: go straight to real allocations for direct I/O COW writes Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-07 19:00   ` Brian Foster
2016-12-07 19:37     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-07 19:46       ` Brian Foster
2016-12-08  4:23         ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-01-24  8:37         ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-24 13:50           ` Brian Foster
2017-01-24 13:59             ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-24 15:02               ` Brian Foster
2017-01-24 15:09                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-24 16:17                   ` Brian Foster
2017-01-24 16:21                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-24 17:43                       ` Brian Foster
2017-01-24 20:08                         ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-01-24 20:10                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-25  0:09                           ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-01-27 17:44                             ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-01-27 17:48                               ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-05 21:05 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: allocate direct I/O COW blocks in iomap_begin Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-06  2:09 ` reflink COW improvements Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170124200855.GA1385@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.