All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>,
	fengguang.wu@intel.com, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi>,
	"linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 09:52:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170126145240.GG29778@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2a1ef925-a217-31b6-ada7-4a2a0dfae51f@roeck-us.net>

[Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19] On 26/01/2017 (Thu 06:22) Guenter Roeck wrote:

> On 01/25/2017 09:38 PM, Stafford Horne wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 08:54:53PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>On 01/25/2017 08:37 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> >>>[Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19] On 23/01/2017 (Mon 23:11) Stafford Horne wrote:
> >>>
> >>>[...]
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>Are all of these builds using the tests from lkp-tests [0]?
> >>>
> >>>Not using any specific tests, other than compiling allmodconfig and
> >>>defconfig.
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>If so and no one is working on openrisc toolchain updates I will package up
> >>>>a modern toolchain for the cdn [1] and send patches for lkp-test.
> >>>>
> >>>>If there is something else that needs to be done let me know.
> >>>>
> >>>>[0] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git
> >>>>[1] https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/4.5.1/
> >>>
> >>>If you could work with Tony (his email is at the bottom of the crosstool
> >>>front page in [1]) to get the or32 binutils updated, that would be
> >>>great.  With all the arch currrently in linux, I pretty much have to
> >>>just use what is available from kernel.org as prebuilts.
> >>>
> >>
> >>Different problem, but from the 0day info I thought you might be interested
> >>in the following breakage as well (seen in -next).
> >>
> >>/opt/buildbot/slave/next-next/build/arch/score/kernel/traps.c: In function 'do_adedata':
> >>/opt/buildbot/slave/next-next/build/arch/score/kernel/traps.c:185:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'search_exception_tables'
> >>
> >>Reported on kerneltests.org.
> >
> >Thanks Guenter,
> >
> >Is this for me of Paul?
> >
> Paul, sorry.

Thanks for the heads up.  I'll make an appropriate addition to the score
patch.  Odd that I didn't see a mail from the 0day bot.

Paul.
--

> 
> Guenter
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>, <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi>,
	"linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 09:52:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170126145240.GG29778@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2a1ef925-a217-31b6-ada7-4a2a0dfae51f@roeck-us.net>

[Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19] On 26/01/2017 (Thu 06:22) Guenter Roeck wrote:

> On 01/25/2017 09:38 PM, Stafford Horne wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 08:54:53PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>On 01/25/2017 08:37 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> >>>[Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19] On 23/01/2017 (Mon 23:11) Stafford Horne wrote:
> >>>
> >>>[...]
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>Are all of these builds using the tests from lkp-tests [0]?
> >>>
> >>>Not using any specific tests, other than compiling allmodconfig and
> >>>defconfig.
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>If so and no one is working on openrisc toolchain updates I will package up
> >>>>a modern toolchain for the cdn [1] and send patches for lkp-test.
> >>>>
> >>>>If there is something else that needs to be done let me know.
> >>>>
> >>>>[0] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git
> >>>>[1] https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/4.5.1/
> >>>
> >>>If you could work with Tony (his email is at the bottom of the crosstool
> >>>front page in [1]) to get the or32 binutils updated, that would be
> >>>great.  With all the arch currrently in linux, I pretty much have to
> >>>just use what is available from kernel.org as prebuilts.
> >>>
> >>
> >>Different problem, but from the 0day info I thought you might be interested
> >>in the following breakage as well (seen in -next).
> >>
> >>/opt/buildbot/slave/next-next/build/arch/score/kernel/traps.c: In function 'do_adedata':
> >>/opt/buildbot/slave/next-next/build/arch/score/kernel/traps.c:185:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'search_exception_tables'
> >>
> >>Reported on kerneltests.org.
> >
> >Thanks Guenter,
> >
> >Is this for me of Paul?
> >
> Paul, sorry.

Thanks for the heads up.  I'll make an appropriate addition to the score
patch.  Odd that I didn't see a mail from the 0day bot.

Paul.
--

> 
> Guenter
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-26 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-19  5:39 linux-next: Tree for Jan 19 Stephen Rothwell
2017-01-19 16:42 ` Paul Gortmaker
2017-01-19 21:59   ` Stafford Horne
2017-01-23 14:11   ` Stafford Horne
2017-01-25 16:37     ` Paul Gortmaker
2017-01-25 16:37       ` Paul Gortmaker
2017-01-26  4:54       ` Guenter Roeck
2017-01-26  5:38         ` Stafford Horne
2017-01-26 14:22           ` Guenter Roeck
2017-01-26 14:52             ` Paul Gortmaker [this message]
2017-01-26 14:52               ` Paul Gortmaker
2017-01-26  5:45       ` Stafford Horne
2017-01-26 15:08         ` Stafford Horne
2017-01-26 16:19           ` Paul Gortmaker
2017-01-26 16:19             ` Paul Gortmaker
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-01-19 22:30 Mark Brown
2024-01-19  1:51 Stephen Rothwell
2023-01-19  5:45 Stephen Rothwell
2021-01-19  7:03 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-19  6:55 Stephen Rothwell
2016-01-19  3:11 Stephen Rothwell
2015-01-19  8:23 Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-19  1:59 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170126145240.GG29778@windriver.com \
    --to=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=shorne@gmail.com \
    --cc=stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.