All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: "Sharma, Shashank" <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/gen9+: Enable hotplug detection early
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 09:54:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170128075409.GA32065@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <da09f556-9036-626f-1659-9a87e536f30e@intel.com>

On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 10:24:19AM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
> Regards
> 
> Shashank
> 
> 
> On 1/27/2017 3:09 PM, Imre Deak wrote:
> >For LSPCON resume time initialization we need to sample the
> >corresponding pin's HPD level, but this is only available when HPD
> >detection is enabled. Currently we enable detection only when enabling
> >HPD interrupts which is too late, so bring the enabling of detection
> >earlier.
> >
> >This is needed by the next patch.
> >
> >Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
> >Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
> >Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> >Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.9+
> >Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> >---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> >  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> >index 8440d8b..6daf522 100644
> >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> >@@ -3142,24 +3142,33 @@ static void ibx_hpd_irq_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >  	I915_WRITE(PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG, hotplug);
> >  }
> >+static void spt_hpd_detection_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >+{
> >+	u32 hotplug;
> >+
> >+	/* Enable digital hotplug on the PCH */
> >+	hotplug = I915_READ(PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG);
> >+	hotplug |= PORTA_HOTPLUG_ENABLE |
> >+		   PORTB_HOTPLUG_ENABLE |
> >+		   PORTC_HOTPLUG_ENABLE |
> >+		   PORTD_HOTPLUG_ENABLE;
> >+	I915_WRITE(PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG, hotplug);
> >+
> >+	hotplug = I915_READ(PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG2);
> >+	hotplug |= PORTE_HOTPLUG_ENABLE;
> >+	I915_WRITE(PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG2, hotplug);
> >+}
> >+
> >  static void spt_hpd_irq_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >  {
> >-	u32 hotplug_irqs, hotplug, enabled_irqs;
> >+	u32 hotplug_irqs, enabled_irqs;
> >  	hotplug_irqs = SDE_HOTPLUG_MASK_SPT;
> >  	enabled_irqs = intel_hpd_enabled_irqs(dev_priv, hpd_spt);
> >  	ibx_display_interrupt_update(dev_priv, hotplug_irqs, enabled_irqs);
> >-	/* Enable digital hotplug on the PCH */
> >-	hotplug = I915_READ(PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG);
> >-	hotplug |= PORTD_HOTPLUG_ENABLE | PORTC_HOTPLUG_ENABLE |
> >-		PORTB_HOTPLUG_ENABLE | PORTA_HOTPLUG_ENABLE;
> >-	I915_WRITE(PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG, hotplug);
> >-
> >-	hotplug = I915_READ(PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG2);
> >-	hotplug |= PORTE_HOTPLUG_ENABLE;
> >-	I915_WRITE(PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG2, hotplug);
> >+	spt_hpd_detection_setup(dev_priv);
> >  }
> >  static void ilk_hpd_irq_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >@@ -3196,18 +3205,15 @@ static void ilk_hpd_irq_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >  	ibx_hpd_irq_setup(dev_priv);
> >  }
> >-static void bxt_hpd_irq_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >+static void __bxt_hpd_detection_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >+					     u32 enabled_irqs)
> >  {
> >-	u32 hotplug_irqs, hotplug, enabled_irqs;
> >-
> >-	enabled_irqs = intel_hpd_enabled_irqs(dev_priv, hpd_bxt);
> >-	hotplug_irqs = BXT_DE_PORT_HOTPLUG_MASK;
> >-
> >-	bdw_update_port_irq(dev_priv, hotplug_irqs, enabled_irqs);
> >+	u32 hotplug;
> >  	hotplug = I915_READ(PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG);
> >-	hotplug |= PORTC_HOTPLUG_ENABLE | PORTB_HOTPLUG_ENABLE |
> >-		PORTA_HOTPLUG_ENABLE;
> >+	hotplug |= PORTA_HOTPLUG_ENABLE |
> >+		   PORTB_HOTPLUG_ENABLE |
> >+		   PORTC_HOTPLUG_ENABLE;
> >  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Invert bit setting: hp_ctl:%x hp_port:%x\n",
> >  		      hotplug, enabled_irqs);
> >@@ -3217,7 +3223,6 @@ static void bxt_hpd_irq_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >  	 * For BXT invert bit has to be set based on AOB design
> >  	 * for HPD detection logic, update it based on VBT fields.
> >  	 */
> >-
> >  	if ((enabled_irqs & BXT_DE_PORT_HP_DDIA) &&
> >  	    intel_bios_is_port_hpd_inverted(dev_priv, PORT_A))
> >  		hotplug |= BXT_DDIA_HPD_INVERT;
> >@@ -3231,6 +3236,23 @@ static void bxt_hpd_irq_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >  	I915_WRITE(PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG, hotplug);
> >  }
> >+static void bxt_hpd_detection_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >+{
> >+	__bxt_hpd_detection_setup(dev_priv, BXT_DE_PORT_HOTPLUG_MASK);
> Do we need another layer of internal function ? Why cant the content of
> __bxt_hpd_detection_setup be here, just
> like spd_hpd_detection_setup, as they both are static to the file ?

The port configuration is platform specific and so I wanted to keep it
close to where the rest of HPD setup is done. The caller of
bxt_hpd_detection_setup() only cares about enabling detection on _all_
ports as the other *_hpd_detection_setup() helpers.

> >+}
> >+
> >+static void bxt_hpd_irq_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >+{
> >+	u32 hotplug_irqs, enabled_irqs;
> >+
> >+	enabled_irqs = intel_hpd_enabled_irqs(dev_priv, hpd_bxt);
> >+	hotplug_irqs = BXT_DE_PORT_HOTPLUG_MASK;
> >+
> >+	bdw_update_port_irq(dev_priv, hotplug_irqs, enabled_irqs);
> >+
> >+	__bxt_hpd_detection_setup(dev_priv, enabled_irqs);
> >+}
> >+
> >  static void ibx_irq_postinstall(struct drm_device *dev)
> >  {
> >  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> >@@ -3246,6 +3268,12 @@ static void ibx_irq_postinstall(struct drm_device *dev)
> >  	gen5_assert_iir_is_zero(dev_priv, SDEIIR);
> >  	I915_WRITE(SDEIMR, ~mask);
> >+
> >+	if (HAS_PCH_IBX(dev_priv) || HAS_PCH_CPT(dev_priv) ||
> >+	    HAS_PCH_LPT(dev_priv))
> >+		; /* TODO: Enable HPD detection on older PCH platforms too */
> >+	else
> >+		spt_hpd_detection_setup(dev_priv);
> >  }
> >  static void gen5_gt_irq_postinstall(struct drm_device *dev)
> >@@ -3457,6 +3485,9 @@ static void gen8_de_irq_postinstall(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >  	GEN5_IRQ_INIT(GEN8_DE_PORT_, ~de_port_masked, de_port_enables);
> >  	GEN5_IRQ_INIT(GEN8_DE_MISC_, ~de_misc_masked, de_misc_masked);
> >+
> >+	if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv))
> I have not done the delta analysis between hotplug interrupts, but this will
> be true for GLK too.
> Should we bother ?

The GLK HPD detection setup and interrupt setup and handling is the same as
on BXT. See bxt_hpd_irq_setup() and bxt_hpd_irq_handler() that are
called on GLK as well.

> 
> - Shashank
> >+		bxt_hpd_detection_setup(dev_priv);
> >  }
> >  static int gen8_irq_postinstall(struct drm_device *dev)
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: "Sharma, Shashank" <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/gen9+: Enable hotplug detection early
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 09:54:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170128075409.GA32065@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <da09f556-9036-626f-1659-9a87e536f30e@intel.com>

On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 10:24:19AM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
> Regards
> 
> Shashank
> 
> 
> On 1/27/2017 3:09 PM, Imre Deak wrote:
> >For LSPCON resume time initialization we need to sample the
> >corresponding pin's HPD level, but this is only available when HPD
> >detection is enabled. Currently we enable detection only when enabling
> >HPD interrupts which is too late, so bring the enabling of detection
> >earlier.
> >
> >This is needed by the next patch.
> >
> >Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
> >Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
> >Cc: Ville Syrj�l� <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> >Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.9+
> >Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> >---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> >  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> >index 8440d8b..6daf522 100644
> >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> >@@ -3142,24 +3142,33 @@ static void ibx_hpd_irq_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >  	I915_WRITE(PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG, hotplug);
> >  }
> >+static void spt_hpd_detection_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >+{
> >+	u32 hotplug;
> >+
> >+	/* Enable digital hotplug on the PCH */
> >+	hotplug = I915_READ(PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG);
> >+	hotplug |= PORTA_HOTPLUG_ENABLE |
> >+		   PORTB_HOTPLUG_ENABLE |
> >+		   PORTC_HOTPLUG_ENABLE |
> >+		   PORTD_HOTPLUG_ENABLE;
> >+	I915_WRITE(PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG, hotplug);
> >+
> >+	hotplug = I915_READ(PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG2);
> >+	hotplug |= PORTE_HOTPLUG_ENABLE;
> >+	I915_WRITE(PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG2, hotplug);
> >+}
> >+
> >  static void spt_hpd_irq_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >  {
> >-	u32 hotplug_irqs, hotplug, enabled_irqs;
> >+	u32 hotplug_irqs, enabled_irqs;
> >  	hotplug_irqs = SDE_HOTPLUG_MASK_SPT;
> >  	enabled_irqs = intel_hpd_enabled_irqs(dev_priv, hpd_spt);
> >  	ibx_display_interrupt_update(dev_priv, hotplug_irqs, enabled_irqs);
> >-	/* Enable digital hotplug on the PCH */
> >-	hotplug = I915_READ(PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG);
> >-	hotplug |= PORTD_HOTPLUG_ENABLE | PORTC_HOTPLUG_ENABLE |
> >-		PORTB_HOTPLUG_ENABLE | PORTA_HOTPLUG_ENABLE;
> >-	I915_WRITE(PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG, hotplug);
> >-
> >-	hotplug = I915_READ(PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG2);
> >-	hotplug |= PORTE_HOTPLUG_ENABLE;
> >-	I915_WRITE(PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG2, hotplug);
> >+	spt_hpd_detection_setup(dev_priv);
> >  }
> >  static void ilk_hpd_irq_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >@@ -3196,18 +3205,15 @@ static void ilk_hpd_irq_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >  	ibx_hpd_irq_setup(dev_priv);
> >  }
> >-static void bxt_hpd_irq_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >+static void __bxt_hpd_detection_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >+					     u32 enabled_irqs)
> >  {
> >-	u32 hotplug_irqs, hotplug, enabled_irqs;
> >-
> >-	enabled_irqs = intel_hpd_enabled_irqs(dev_priv, hpd_bxt);
> >-	hotplug_irqs = BXT_DE_PORT_HOTPLUG_MASK;
> >-
> >-	bdw_update_port_irq(dev_priv, hotplug_irqs, enabled_irqs);
> >+	u32 hotplug;
> >  	hotplug = I915_READ(PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG);
> >-	hotplug |= PORTC_HOTPLUG_ENABLE | PORTB_HOTPLUG_ENABLE |
> >-		PORTA_HOTPLUG_ENABLE;
> >+	hotplug |= PORTA_HOTPLUG_ENABLE |
> >+		   PORTB_HOTPLUG_ENABLE |
> >+		   PORTC_HOTPLUG_ENABLE;
> >  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Invert bit setting: hp_ctl:%x hp_port:%x\n",
> >  		      hotplug, enabled_irqs);
> >@@ -3217,7 +3223,6 @@ static void bxt_hpd_irq_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >  	 * For BXT invert bit has to be set based on AOB design
> >  	 * for HPD detection logic, update it based on VBT fields.
> >  	 */
> >-
> >  	if ((enabled_irqs & BXT_DE_PORT_HP_DDIA) &&
> >  	    intel_bios_is_port_hpd_inverted(dev_priv, PORT_A))
> >  		hotplug |= BXT_DDIA_HPD_INVERT;
> >@@ -3231,6 +3236,23 @@ static void bxt_hpd_irq_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >  	I915_WRITE(PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG, hotplug);
> >  }
> >+static void bxt_hpd_detection_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >+{
> >+	__bxt_hpd_detection_setup(dev_priv, BXT_DE_PORT_HOTPLUG_MASK);
> Do we need another layer of internal function ? Why cant the content of
> __bxt_hpd_detection_setup be here, just
> like spd_hpd_detection_setup, as they both are static to the file ?

The port configuration is platform specific and so I wanted to keep it
close to where the rest of HPD setup is done. The caller of
bxt_hpd_detection_setup() only cares about enabling detection on _all_
ports as the other *_hpd_detection_setup() helpers.

> >+}
> >+
> >+static void bxt_hpd_irq_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >+{
> >+	u32 hotplug_irqs, enabled_irqs;
> >+
> >+	enabled_irqs = intel_hpd_enabled_irqs(dev_priv, hpd_bxt);
> >+	hotplug_irqs = BXT_DE_PORT_HOTPLUG_MASK;
> >+
> >+	bdw_update_port_irq(dev_priv, hotplug_irqs, enabled_irqs);
> >+
> >+	__bxt_hpd_detection_setup(dev_priv, enabled_irqs);
> >+}
> >+
> >  static void ibx_irq_postinstall(struct drm_device *dev)
> >  {
> >  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> >@@ -3246,6 +3268,12 @@ static void ibx_irq_postinstall(struct drm_device *dev)
> >  	gen5_assert_iir_is_zero(dev_priv, SDEIIR);
> >  	I915_WRITE(SDEIMR, ~mask);
> >+
> >+	if (HAS_PCH_IBX(dev_priv) || HAS_PCH_CPT(dev_priv) ||
> >+	    HAS_PCH_LPT(dev_priv))
> >+		; /* TODO: Enable HPD detection on older PCH platforms too */
> >+	else
> >+		spt_hpd_detection_setup(dev_priv);
> >  }
> >  static void gen5_gt_irq_postinstall(struct drm_device *dev)
> >@@ -3457,6 +3485,9 @@ static void gen8_de_irq_postinstall(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >  	GEN5_IRQ_INIT(GEN8_DE_PORT_, ~de_port_masked, de_port_enables);
> >  	GEN5_IRQ_INIT(GEN8_DE_MISC_, ~de_misc_masked, de_misc_masked);
> >+
> >+	if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv))
> I have not done the delta analysis between hotplug interrupts, but this will
> be true for GLK too.
> Should we bother ?

The GLK HPD detection setup and interrupt setup and handling is the same as
on BXT. See bxt_hpd_irq_setup() and bxt_hpd_irq_handler() that are
called on GLK as well.

> 
> - Shashank
> >+		bxt_hpd_detection_setup(dev_priv);
> >  }
> >  static int gen8_irq_postinstall(struct drm_device *dev)
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-28  7:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-27  9:39 [PATCH 0/4] drm/i915/lspcon: Fix resume time init due to low HPD Imre Deak
2017-01-27  9:39 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/gen9+: Enable hotplug detection early Imre Deak
2017-01-27  9:39   ` Imre Deak
2017-01-28  4:54   ` Sharma, Shashank
2017-01-28  4:54     ` Sharma, Shashank
2017-01-28  7:54     ` Imre Deak [this message]
2017-01-28  7:54       ` Imre Deak
2017-01-29  4:56       ` Sharma, Shashank
2017-01-29  4:56         ` Sharma, Shashank
2017-01-27  9:39 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/lspcon: Fix resume time initialization due to unasserted HPD Imre Deak
2017-01-27  9:39   ` Imre Deak
2017-01-28  5:02   ` Sharma, Shashank
2017-01-28  5:02     ` Sharma, Shashank
2017-01-28  8:17     ` Imre Deak
2017-01-28  8:17       ` Imre Deak
2017-01-29  5:03       ` Sharma, Shashank
2017-01-29  5:03         ` Sharma, Shashank
2017-01-29 16:13         ` Imre Deak
2017-01-29 16:13           ` Imre Deak
2017-02-02 10:53           ` Sharma, Shashank
2017-02-02 10:53             ` Sharma, Shashank
2017-01-27  9:39 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/lspcon: Remove DPCD compare based resume time workaround Imre Deak
2017-01-28  5:06   ` Sharma, Shashank
2017-01-28  8:19     ` Imre Deak
2017-02-02 10:54       ` Sharma, Shashank
2017-01-27  9:39 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/gen5+, pch: Enable hotplug detection early Imre Deak
2017-01-28  5:09   ` Sharma, Shashank
2017-01-27 11:24 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/lspcon: Fix resume time init due to low HPD Patchwork
2017-02-06 14:46   ` Imre Deak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170128075409.GA32065@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com \
    --to=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=shashank.sharma@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.