All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	James Bottomley <james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Thumshirn <jth@kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sg: protect access to to 'reserved' page array
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 14:18:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170201131852.GC3661@linux-x5ow.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170201131247.GA5384@lst.de>

On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 02:12:48PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
> This seems to be abusing an atomic bitflag as a lock.  And I think
> in general we have two different things here that this patch conflates:
> 
>  a) a lock to protect building and using the reserve lists
>  b) a flag is a reservations is in use

I did have a patch doing exactly that but (appart from lockdep complaints) we
decided to drop it, as it made the code even more confusing.

-- 
Johannes Thumshirn                                          Storage
jthumshirn@suse.de                                +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	James Bottomley <james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Thumshirn <jth@kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sg: protect access to to 'reserved' page array
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 14:18:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170201131852.GC3661@linux-x5ow.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170201131247.GA5384@lst.de>

On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 02:12:48PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
> This seems to be abusing an atomic bitflag as a lock.  And I think
> in general we have two different things here that this patch conflates:
> 
>  a) a lock to protect building and using the reserve lists
>  b) a flag is a reservations is in use

I did have a patch doing exactly that but (appart from lockdep complaints) we
decided to drop it, as it made the code even more confusing.

-- 
Johannes Thumshirn                                          Storage
jthumshirn@suse.de                                +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N�rnberg
GF: Felix Imend�rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG N�rnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-01 13:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-01 11:22 [PATCH] sg: protect access to to 'reserved' page array Hannes Reinecke
2017-02-01 11:23 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-02-01 11:23   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-02-01 11:46 ` kbuild test robot
2017-02-01 11:46   ` kbuild test robot
2017-02-01 11:49 ` kbuild test robot
2017-02-01 11:49   ` kbuild test robot
2017-02-01 13:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-01 13:18   ` Johannes Thumshirn [this message]
2017-02-01 13:18     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-02-01 13:21   ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-02-01 13:21     ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-02-14 20:48     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-02-15  6:54       ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-02-15  6:54         ` Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170201131852.GC3661@linux-x5ow.site \
    --to=jthumshirn@suse.de \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=jth@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.