From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET 0/4] perf diff: Introduce delta-abs compute method (v2)
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:14:43 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170210091443.GA17307@danjae.aot.lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170210074111.GB14923@gmail.com>
Hi Ingo,
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 08:41:11AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > This patchset adds 'delta-abs' compute method to -c/--compute option.
> > The 'delta-abs' is same as 'delta' but shows entries with bigger
> > absolute delta first instead of sorting numerically. This is only
> > useful together with -o option.
> >
> > * v2 changes
> > - rebase onto acme/perf/core
> > - change default option to '-o 1 -c delta-abs'
> >
> >
> > Below is default output (-c delta):
> >
> > $ perf diff -o 1 -c delta | grep -v ^# | head
> > 42.22% +4.97% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] cfb_imageblit
> > 0.62% +1.23% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] mutex_lock
> > +1.15% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] copy_user_generic_string
> > 2.40% +0.95% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] bit_putcs
> > 0.31% +0.79% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] link_path_walk
> > +0.64% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] kmem_cache_alloc
> > 0.00% +0.57% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __rcu_read_unlock
> > +0.45% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] alloc_set_pte
> > 0.16% +0.45% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] menu_select
> > +0.41% ld-2.24.so [.] do_lookup_x
> >
> > Now with 'delta-abs' it shows entries have bigger delta value either
> > positive or negative.
> >
> > $ perf diff -o 1 -c delta-abs | grep -v ^# | head
> > 42.22% +4.97% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] cfb_imageblit
> > 12.72% -3.01% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] intel_idle
> > 9.72% -1.31% [unknown] [.] 0x0000000000411343
> > 0.62% +1.23% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] mutex_lock
> > +1.15% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] copy_user_generic_string
> > 2.40% +0.95% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] bit_putcs
> > 0.31% +0.79% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] link_path_walk
> > 1.35% -0.71% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] smp_call_function_single
> > +0.64% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] kmem_cache_alloc
> > 0.00% +0.57% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __rcu_read_unlock
>
> Nice!
>
> BTW., to me the second output looks a lot more intuitive and useful than the
> default one.
Thanks!
>
> Would it be possible to flip over the default to the 'most useful' options, and
> see whether anyone complains?
The patch 4 makes it default.
By the way, the current default (sort by baseline) looks like below:
$ perf diff | grep -v ^# | head
42.22% +4.97% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] cfb_imageblit
12.72% -3.01% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] intel_idle
9.72% -1.31% [unknown] [.] 0x0000000000411343
2.40% +0.95% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] bit_putcs
1.35% -0.71% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] smp_call_function_single
0.62% +1.23% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] mutex_lock
0.31% +0.79% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] link_path_walk
0.16% +0.45% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] menu_select
0.00% +0.57% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __rcu_read_unlock
While this example doesn't show much difference, it could be..
Thanks,
Namhyung
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-10 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-10 7:36 [PATCHSET 0/4] perf diff: Introduce delta-abs compute method (v2) Namhyung Kim
2017-02-10 7:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] perf diff: Add 'delta-abs' compute method Namhyung Kim
2017-02-14 6:38 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2017-02-10 7:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] perf diff: Add diff.order config option Namhyung Kim
2017-02-14 6:38 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2017-02-10 7:36 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] perf diff: Add diff.compute " Namhyung Kim
2017-02-14 6:39 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2017-02-10 7:36 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] perf diff: Change default setting to "delta-abs" Namhyung Kim
2017-02-10 16:18 ` [PATCH v2.1 " Namhyung Kim
2017-02-14 6:39 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2017-02-10 7:41 ` [PATCHSET 0/4] perf diff: Introduce delta-abs compute method (v2) Ingo Molnar
2017-02-10 9:14 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2017-02-10 10:29 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170210091443.GA17307@danjae.aot.lge.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.