From: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
To: jazeltq@gmail.com
Cc: jdurgin@redhat.com, dillaman@redhat.com, kwolf@redhat.com,
mreitz@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, eblake@redhat.com,
tianqing <tianqing@unitedstack.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v5] RBD: Add support readv,writev for rbd
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:51:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170216155159.GE8801@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170216090002.12511-1-jazeltq@gmail.com>
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 05:00:02PM +0800, jazeltq@gmail.com wrote:
> From: tianqing <tianqing@unitedstack.com>
>
> Rbd can do readv and writev directly, so wo do not need to transform
> iov to buf or vice versa any more.
>
> Signed-off-by: tianqing <tianqing@unitedstack.com>
> ---
> block/rbd.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/rbd.c b/block/rbd.c
> index a57b3e3..75ae1d6 100644
> --- a/block/rbd.c
> +++ b/block/rbd.c
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
> */
>
> /* rbd_aio_discard added in 0.1.2 */
> -#if LIBRBD_VERSION_CODE >= LIBRBD_VERSION(0, 1, 2)
> +#if LIBRBD_VERSION_CODE >= LIBRBD_VERSION(12, 0, 0)
> #define LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_DISCARD
> #else
> #undef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_DISCARD
> @@ -73,7 +73,12 @@ typedef struct RBDAIOCB {
> BlockAIOCB common;
> int64_t ret;
> QEMUIOVector *qiov;
> +/* Note:
> + * The LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_IOVEC is defined in librbd.h.
> + */
I understand that since this feature relies on new symbols in the library,
the ifdef can't be entirely avoided. However, there are a few changes that
can make the code much more readable, and greatly reduce the use of ifdefs
through the code.
For instance, you could have helper constants:
#ifdef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_IOVEC
#define LIBRBD_USE_IOVEC 1
#else
#define LIBRBD_USE_IOVEC 0
#endif
Now that can be used for a more natural code, with minimal ifdefs. The
compiler optimizations should still remove the code, as well.
A helper function for memset will also keep things simpler:
static void qemu_rbd_memset(RADOSCB *rcb, int64_t offs)
{
if (LIBRBD_USE_IOVEC) {
RBDAIOCB *acb = rcb->acb;
iov_memset(acb->qiov->iov, acb->qiov->niov, offs, 0,
acb->qiov->size - offs);
} else {
memset(rcb->buf + offs, 0, rcb->size - offs);
}
}
> +#ifndef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_IOVEC
> char *bounce;
> +#endif
This conditional can go away (see [1]).
> RBDAIOCmd cmd;
> int error;
> struct BDRVRBDState *s;
> @@ -83,7 +88,9 @@ typedef struct RADOSCB {
> RBDAIOCB *acb;
> struct BDRVRBDState *s;
> int64_t size;
> +#ifndef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_IOVEC
> char *buf;
> +#endif
As can this.
> int64_t ret;
> } RADOSCB;
>
> @@ -426,11 +433,21 @@ static void qemu_rbd_complete_aio(RADOSCB *rcb)
> }
> } else {
> if (r < 0) {
> +#ifndef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_IOVEC
> memset(rcb->buf, 0, rcb->size);
> +#else
> + iov_memset(acb->qiov->iov, acb->qiov->niov, 0, 0, acb->qiov->size);
> +#endif
This just becomes:
qemu_rbd_memset(rcb, 0);
> acb->ret = r;
> acb->error = 1;
> } else if (r < rcb->size) {
> +#ifndef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_IOVEC
> memset(rcb->buf + r, 0, rcb->size - r);
> +#else
> + iov_memset(acb->qiov->iov, acb->qiov->niov,
> + r, 0, acb->qiov->size - r);
> +#endif
> +
Same here:
qemu_rbd_memset(rcb, r);
> if (!acb->error) {
> acb->ret = rcb->size;
> }
> @@ -441,10 +458,12 @@ static void qemu_rbd_complete_aio(RADOSCB *rcb)
>
> g_free(rcb);
>
> +#ifndef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_IOVEC
> if (acb->cmd == RBD_AIO_READ) {
> qemu_iovec_from_buf(acb->qiov, 0, acb->bounce, acb->qiov->size);
> }
> qemu_vfree(acb->bounce);
> +#endif
[1]
Instead of a conditional, you can now use the constant with an if statement:
if (!LIBRBD_USE_IOVEC) {
if (acb->cmd == RBD_AIO_READ) {
qemu_iovec_from_buf(acb->qiov, 0, acb->bounce, acb->qiov->size);
}
qemu_vfree(acb->bounce);
}
> acb->common.cb(acb->common.opaque, (acb->ret > 0 ? 0 : acb->ret));
>
> qemu_aio_unref(acb);
> @@ -655,8 +674,10 @@ static BlockAIOCB *rbd_start_aio(BlockDriverState *bs,
> RBDAIOCB *acb;
> RADOSCB *rcb = NULL;
> rbd_completion_t c;
> - char *buf;
> int r;
> +#ifndef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_IOVEC
> + char *buf = NULL;
> +#endif
This variable can completely go away with some code re-arrangement (below)
>
> BDRVRBDState *s = bs->opaque;
>
> @@ -664,6 +685,8 @@ static BlockAIOCB *rbd_start_aio(BlockDriverState *bs,
> acb->cmd = cmd;
> acb->qiov = qiov;
> assert(!qiov || qiov->size == size);
[2]
Allocate rcb here
> +#ifndef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_IOVEC
> +
You can use if(!LIBRBD_USE_IOVEC) here then.
> if (cmd == RBD_AIO_DISCARD || cmd == RBD_AIO_FLUSH) {
> acb->bounce = NULL;
> } else {
> @@ -672,19 +695,21 @@ static BlockAIOCB *rbd_start_aio(BlockDriverState *bs,
> goto failed;
> }
> }
> - acb->ret = 0;
> - acb->error = 0;
> - acb->s = s;
> -
> if (cmd == RBD_AIO_WRITE) {
> qemu_iovec_to_buf(acb->qiov, 0, acb->bounce, qiov->size);
> }
> -
> buf = acb->bounce;
This can just become rcb->buf = acb->bounce
> +#endif
> + acb->ret = 0;
> + acb->error = 0;
> + acb->s = s;
>
> rcb = g_new(RADOSCB, 1);
Move this to [2]
> +
> rcb->acb = acb;
> +#ifndef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_IOVEC
> rcb->buf = buf;
> +#endif
These 3 lines can then go away
> rcb->s = acb->s;
> rcb->size = size;
> r = rbd_aio_create_completion(rcb, (rbd_callback_t) rbd_finish_aiocb, &c);
> @@ -694,10 +719,18 @@ static BlockAIOCB *rbd_start_aio(BlockDriverState *bs,
>
> switch (cmd) {
> case RBD_AIO_WRITE:
> +#ifndef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_IOVEC
> r = rbd_aio_write(s->image, off, size, buf, c);
If you use rcb->buf here, that allows buf to go away completely.
> +#else
> + r = rbd_aio_writev(s->image, qiov->iov, qiov->niov, off, c);
> +#endif
> break;
> case RBD_AIO_READ:
> +#ifndef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_IOVEC
> r = rbd_aio_read(s->image, off, size, buf, c);
Same
> +#else
> + r = rbd_aio_readv(s->image, qiov->iov, qiov->niov, off, c);
> +#endif
> break;
> case RBD_AIO_DISCARD:
> r = rbd_aio_discard_wrapper(s->image, off, size, c);
> @@ -719,7 +752,9 @@ failed_completion:
> rbd_aio_release(c);
> failed:
> g_free(rcb);
> +#ifndef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_IOVEC
And use the if(!LIBRBD_USE_IOVEC) here too.
> qemu_vfree(acb->bounce);
> +#endif
> qemu_aio_unref(acb);
> return NULL;
> }
> --
> 2.10.2
>
-Jeff
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
To: jazeltq@gmail.com
Cc: jdurgin@redhat.com, dillaman@redhat.com, kwolf@redhat.com,
mreitz@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, eblake@redhat.com,
tianqing <tianqing@unitedstack.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v5] RBD: Add support readv,writev for rbd
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:51:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170216155159.GE8801@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170216090002.12511-1-jazeltq@gmail.com>
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 05:00:02PM +0800, jazeltq@gmail.com wrote:
> From: tianqing <tianqing@unitedstack.com>
>
> Rbd can do readv and writev directly, so wo do not need to transform
> iov to buf or vice versa any more.
>
> Signed-off-by: tianqing <tianqing@unitedstack.com>
> ---
> block/rbd.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/rbd.c b/block/rbd.c
> index a57b3e3..75ae1d6 100644
> --- a/block/rbd.c
> +++ b/block/rbd.c
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
> */
>
> /* rbd_aio_discard added in 0.1.2 */
> -#if LIBRBD_VERSION_CODE >= LIBRBD_VERSION(0, 1, 2)
> +#if LIBRBD_VERSION_CODE >= LIBRBD_VERSION(12, 0, 0)
> #define LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_DISCARD
> #else
> #undef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_DISCARD
> @@ -73,7 +73,12 @@ typedef struct RBDAIOCB {
> BlockAIOCB common;
> int64_t ret;
> QEMUIOVector *qiov;
> +/* Note:
> + * The LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_IOVEC is defined in librbd.h.
> + */
I understand that since this feature relies on new symbols in the library,
the ifdef can't be entirely avoided. However, there are a few changes that
can make the code much more readable, and greatly reduce the use of ifdefs
through the code.
For instance, you could have helper constants:
#ifdef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_IOVEC
#define LIBRBD_USE_IOVEC 1
#else
#define LIBRBD_USE_IOVEC 0
#endif
Now that can be used for a more natural code, with minimal ifdefs. The
compiler optimizations should still remove the code, as well.
A helper function for memset will also keep things simpler:
static void qemu_rbd_memset(RADOSCB *rcb, int64_t offs)
{
if (LIBRBD_USE_IOVEC) {
RBDAIOCB *acb = rcb->acb;
iov_memset(acb->qiov->iov, acb->qiov->niov, offs, 0,
acb->qiov->size - offs);
} else {
memset(rcb->buf + offs, 0, rcb->size - offs);
}
}
> +#ifndef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_IOVEC
> char *bounce;
> +#endif
This conditional can go away (see [1]).
> RBDAIOCmd cmd;
> int error;
> struct BDRVRBDState *s;
> @@ -83,7 +88,9 @@ typedef struct RADOSCB {
> RBDAIOCB *acb;
> struct BDRVRBDState *s;
> int64_t size;
> +#ifndef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_IOVEC
> char *buf;
> +#endif
As can this.
> int64_t ret;
> } RADOSCB;
>
> @@ -426,11 +433,21 @@ static void qemu_rbd_complete_aio(RADOSCB *rcb)
> }
> } else {
> if (r < 0) {
> +#ifndef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_IOVEC
> memset(rcb->buf, 0, rcb->size);
> +#else
> + iov_memset(acb->qiov->iov, acb->qiov->niov, 0, 0, acb->qiov->size);
> +#endif
This just becomes:
qemu_rbd_memset(rcb, 0);
> acb->ret = r;
> acb->error = 1;
> } else if (r < rcb->size) {
> +#ifndef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_IOVEC
> memset(rcb->buf + r, 0, rcb->size - r);
> +#else
> + iov_memset(acb->qiov->iov, acb->qiov->niov,
> + r, 0, acb->qiov->size - r);
> +#endif
> +
Same here:
qemu_rbd_memset(rcb, r);
> if (!acb->error) {
> acb->ret = rcb->size;
> }
> @@ -441,10 +458,12 @@ static void qemu_rbd_complete_aio(RADOSCB *rcb)
>
> g_free(rcb);
>
> +#ifndef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_IOVEC
> if (acb->cmd == RBD_AIO_READ) {
> qemu_iovec_from_buf(acb->qiov, 0, acb->bounce, acb->qiov->size);
> }
> qemu_vfree(acb->bounce);
> +#endif
[1]
Instead of a conditional, you can now use the constant with an if statement:
if (!LIBRBD_USE_IOVEC) {
if (acb->cmd == RBD_AIO_READ) {
qemu_iovec_from_buf(acb->qiov, 0, acb->bounce, acb->qiov->size);
}
qemu_vfree(acb->bounce);
}
> acb->common.cb(acb->common.opaque, (acb->ret > 0 ? 0 : acb->ret));
>
> qemu_aio_unref(acb);
> @@ -655,8 +674,10 @@ static BlockAIOCB *rbd_start_aio(BlockDriverState *bs,
> RBDAIOCB *acb;
> RADOSCB *rcb = NULL;
> rbd_completion_t c;
> - char *buf;
> int r;
> +#ifndef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_IOVEC
> + char *buf = NULL;
> +#endif
This variable can completely go away with some code re-arrangement (below)
>
> BDRVRBDState *s = bs->opaque;
>
> @@ -664,6 +685,8 @@ static BlockAIOCB *rbd_start_aio(BlockDriverState *bs,
> acb->cmd = cmd;
> acb->qiov = qiov;
> assert(!qiov || qiov->size == size);
[2]
Allocate rcb here
> +#ifndef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_IOVEC
> +
You can use if(!LIBRBD_USE_IOVEC) here then.
> if (cmd == RBD_AIO_DISCARD || cmd == RBD_AIO_FLUSH) {
> acb->bounce = NULL;
> } else {
> @@ -672,19 +695,21 @@ static BlockAIOCB *rbd_start_aio(BlockDriverState *bs,
> goto failed;
> }
> }
> - acb->ret = 0;
> - acb->error = 0;
> - acb->s = s;
> -
> if (cmd == RBD_AIO_WRITE) {
> qemu_iovec_to_buf(acb->qiov, 0, acb->bounce, qiov->size);
> }
> -
> buf = acb->bounce;
This can just become rcb->buf = acb->bounce
> +#endif
> + acb->ret = 0;
> + acb->error = 0;
> + acb->s = s;
>
> rcb = g_new(RADOSCB, 1);
Move this to [2]
> +
> rcb->acb = acb;
> +#ifndef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_IOVEC
> rcb->buf = buf;
> +#endif
These 3 lines can then go away
> rcb->s = acb->s;
> rcb->size = size;
> r = rbd_aio_create_completion(rcb, (rbd_callback_t) rbd_finish_aiocb, &c);
> @@ -694,10 +719,18 @@ static BlockAIOCB *rbd_start_aio(BlockDriverState *bs,
>
> switch (cmd) {
> case RBD_AIO_WRITE:
> +#ifndef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_IOVEC
> r = rbd_aio_write(s->image, off, size, buf, c);
If you use rcb->buf here, that allows buf to go away completely.
> +#else
> + r = rbd_aio_writev(s->image, qiov->iov, qiov->niov, off, c);
> +#endif
> break;
> case RBD_AIO_READ:
> +#ifndef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_IOVEC
> r = rbd_aio_read(s->image, off, size, buf, c);
Same
> +#else
> + r = rbd_aio_readv(s->image, qiov->iov, qiov->niov, off, c);
> +#endif
> break;
> case RBD_AIO_DISCARD:
> r = rbd_aio_discard_wrapper(s->image, off, size, c);
> @@ -719,7 +752,9 @@ failed_completion:
> rbd_aio_release(c);
> failed:
> g_free(rcb);
> +#ifndef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_IOVEC
And use the if(!LIBRBD_USE_IOVEC) here too.
> qemu_vfree(acb->bounce);
> +#endif
> qemu_aio_unref(acb);
> return NULL;
> }
> --
> 2.10.2
>
-Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-16 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-21 10:59 [RFC v3] RBD: Add support readv,writev for rbd jazeltq
2017-01-21 10:59 ` [Qemu-devel] " jazeltq
2017-01-21 11:13 ` no-reply
2017-01-21 13:19 ` [RFC v4] " jazeltq
2017-01-21 13:19 ` [Qemu-devel] " jazeltq
2017-02-16 8:43 ` jazeltq
2017-02-16 8:43 ` [Qemu-devel] " jazeltq
2017-02-16 9:00 ` [RFC v5] " jazeltq
2017-02-16 9:00 ` [Qemu-devel] " jazeltq
2017-02-16 12:07 ` Tiger Hu
2017-02-16 12:07 ` [Qemu-devel] " Tiger Hu
2017-02-16 14:03 ` Jaze Lee
2017-02-16 14:03 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jaze Lee
2017-02-16 15:13 ` Alexandre DERUMIER
2017-02-16 15:13 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alexandre DERUMIER
2017-02-16 15:26 ` Jason Dillaman
2017-02-16 15:26 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jason Dillaman
2017-02-16 14:14 ` Jason Dillaman
2017-02-16 14:14 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jason Dillaman
2017-02-16 14:22 ` Jaze Lee
2017-02-16 14:22 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jaze Lee
2017-02-16 15:45 ` Eric Blake
2017-02-16 15:45 ` Eric Blake
2017-02-16 15:51 ` Jeff Cody [this message]
2017-02-16 15:51 ` Jeff Cody
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170216155159.GE8801@localhost.localdomain \
--to=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dillaman@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=jazeltq@gmail.com \
--cc=jdurgin@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=tianqing@unitedstack.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.