From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>
Cc: marc.zyngier@arm.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, dave.martin@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64/kvm: survive unknown traps from guests
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 14:01:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170220140106.GA9583@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1b9e40b9-a6f8-97d3-eacc-15a4f664d4a7@arm.com>
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 01:48:32PM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 20/02/17 12:30, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >The patch makes KVM handle any unknown EC by injecting an UNDEFINED
> >exception into the guest, with a corresponding (ratelimited) warning in
> >the host dmesg. We could later improve on this with with a new (opt-in)
> >exit to the host userspace.
>
> If the unknown EC happens to be an asynchronous exception (allocated
> from the second range), we are not sure if that was triggered by this
> guest, or a different guest or even the hypervisor if we cannot really
> isolate the exception(with/without the RAS extensions, i.e ESB).
Sure; that is certainly a worry.
> And I accept there may not be a perfect solution to the problem
> either. May be we could explicitly mention about "unsure" exceptions,
> so that it might help, people who may not really have the deep
> knowledge about the exception code schemes.
I guess we could, though I'm not sure how this is going to be helpful
for those without an understanding of the EC values. We can only say it
*may* be an asynchronous exception, so to understand the issue you need
to understand the EC value.
Thanks,
Mark.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] arm64/kvm: survive unknown traps from guests
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 14:01:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170220140106.GA9583@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1b9e40b9-a6f8-97d3-eacc-15a4f664d4a7@arm.com>
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 01:48:32PM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 20/02/17 12:30, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >The patch makes KVM handle any unknown EC by injecting an UNDEFINED
> >exception into the guest, with a corresponding (ratelimited) warning in
> >the host dmesg. We could later improve on this with with a new (opt-in)
> >exit to the host userspace.
>
> If the unknown EC happens to be an asynchronous exception (allocated
> from the second range), we are not sure if that was triggered by this
> guest, or a different guest or even the hypervisor if we cannot really
> isolate the exception(with/without the RAS extensions, i.e ESB).
Sure; that is certainly a worry.
> And I accept there may not be a perfect solution to the problem
> either. May be we could explicitly mention about "unsure" exceptions,
> so that it might help, people who may not really have the deep
> knowledge about the exception code schemes.
I guess we could, though I'm not sure how this is going to be helpful
for those without an understanding of the EC values. We can only say it
*may* be an asynchronous exception, so to understand the issue you need
to understand the EC value.
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-20 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-20 12:30 [PATCH 0/2] arm{,64}/kvm: survive unknown traps from guests Mark Rutland
2017-02-20 12:30 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-20 12:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm/kvm: " Mark Rutland
2017-02-20 12:30 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-06 15:08 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-03-06 15:08 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-03-06 17:33 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-06 17:33 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-07 7:54 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-03-07 7:54 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-02-20 12:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64/kvm: " Mark Rutland
2017-02-20 12:30 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-20 13:48 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-02-20 13:48 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-02-20 14:01 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2017-02-20 14:01 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-06 15:08 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-03-06 15:08 ` Christoffer Dall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170220140106.GA9583@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com \
--cc=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.