From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul-5HdwGun5lf+gSpxsJD1C4w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto-kltTT9wpgjJwATOyAt5JVQ@public.gmane.org>,
Linux FS Devel
<linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Linux API <linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>,
Andrew Morton
<akpm-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
Andrew Vagin <avagin-5HdwGun5lf+gSpxsJD1C4w@public.gmane.org>,
Michael Kerrisk
<mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Kirill Kolyshkin <kir-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron-JqFfY2XvxFXQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Andrey Vagin <avagin-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] procfs: fdinfo -- Extend information about epoll target files
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 10:54:38 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170222075438.GB22938@uranus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58AD4147.20801-5HdwGun5lf+gSpxsJD1C4w@public.gmane.org>
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:44:07AM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> On 02/21/2017 10:16 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:41:12AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >>> Thus lets add file position, inode and device number where
> >>> this target lays. This three fields can be used as a primary
> >>> key for sorting, and together with kcmp help CRIU can find
> >>> out an exact file target (from the whole set of processes
> >>> being checkpointed).
> >>
> >> I have no problem with this, but I'm wondering whether kcmp's ordered
> >> comparisons could also be used for this purpose.
> >
> > Yes it can, but it would increas number of kcmp calls signisicantly.
>
> Actually it shouldn't. If you extend the kcmp argument to accept the
> epollfd:epollslot pair, this would be effectively the same as if you
> had all your epoll-ed files injected into your fdtable with "strange"
> fd numbers. We already have two-level rbtree for this in criu, adding
> extended ("strange") fd to it should be OK.
Nope. Pavel, I guess you forget how we handle file tree in criu currently.
We call for kcmp only if we have to -- when primary key for two entries
is the same.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linuxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Vagin <avagin@virtuozzo.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
Kirill Kolyshkin <kir@openvz.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>, Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] procfs: fdinfo -- Extend information about epoll target files
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 10:54:38 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170222075438.GB22938@uranus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58AD4147.20801@virtuozzo.com>
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:44:07AM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> On 02/21/2017 10:16 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:41:12AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >>> Thus lets add file position, inode and device number where
> >>> this target lays. This three fields can be used as a primary
> >>> key for sorting, and together with kcmp help CRIU can find
> >>> out an exact file target (from the whole set of processes
> >>> being checkpointed).
> >>
> >> I have no problem with this, but I'm wondering whether kcmp's ordered
> >> comparisons could also be used for this purpose.
> >
> > Yes it can, but it would increas number of kcmp calls signisicantly.
>
> Actually it shouldn't. If you extend the kcmp argument to accept the
> epollfd:epollslot pair, this would be effectively the same as if you
> had all your epoll-ed files injected into your fdtable with "strange"
> fd numbers. We already have two-level rbtree for this in criu, adding
> extended ("strange") fd to it should be OK.
Nope. Pavel, I guess you forget how we handle file tree in criu currently.
We call for kcmp only if we have to -- when primary key for two entries
is the same.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-22 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-21 16:59 [RFC 1/3] procfs: fdinfo -- Extend information about epoll target files Cyrill Gorcunov
2017-02-21 16:59 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
[not found] ` <20170221171254.954209904-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-21 18:41 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-02-21 18:41 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-02-21 19:16 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2017-02-22 7:44 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2017-02-22 7:44 ` Pavel Emelyanov
[not found] ` <58AD4147.20801-5HdwGun5lf+gSpxsJD1C4w@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-22 7:54 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2017-02-22 7:54 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2017-02-22 8:09 ` Pavel Emelyanov
[not found] ` <58AD4733.5060304-5HdwGun5lf+gSpxsJD1C4w@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-22 8:18 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2017-02-22 8:18 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2017-02-22 8:29 ` Pavel Emelyanov
[not found] ` <58AD4BE3.2080803-5HdwGun5lf+gSpxsJD1C4w@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-22 8:35 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2017-02-22 8:35 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170222075438.GB22938@uranus \
--to=gorcunov-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=akpm-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=avagin-5HdwGun5lf+gSpxsJD1C4w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=avagin-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jbaron-JqFfY2XvxFXQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kir-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=luto-kltTT9wpgjJwATOyAt5JVQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org \
--cc=xemul-5HdwGun5lf+gSpxsJD1C4w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.