All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: SIMRAN SINGHAL <singhalsimran0@gmail.com>
Cc: outreachy-kernel <outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com>,
	devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] staging: rtl8192u: Prefer using the BIT macro
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 08:54:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170225075432.GC1614@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e1cde734-003d-4b3d-bba0-d37f5edd8e2b@googlegroups.com>

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:10:21PM -0800, SIMRAN SINGHAL wrote:
> 
> 
> On Friday, February 24, 2017 at 10:46:21 PM UTC+5:30, gregkh wrote:
> 
>     On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:20:59PM +0530, simran singhal wrote:
>     > Replaces left shift operation (1 << d) by BIT(x) macro.
>     >
>     > Fix the checkpatch.pl issue:
>     > CHECK: Prefer using the BIT macro replacing
>     >
>     > Signed-off-by: simran singhal <singhal...@gmail.com>
>     > ---
>     > �
>     > �V2:
>     > � �-modified patch message.
>     >
>     > �drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211.h | 140
>     ++++++++++++-------------
>     > �1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
> 
>     The last chunk of this patch did not apply, please fix up and resend.
> 
>     thanks,
> 
>     greg k-h
> 
> 
> � Can you please elaborate what's the problem with the last chunk of this patch
> and�
> � to be more precise what do you mean by "last chunk of this patch". I am not
> getting�
> � what's the problem with this patch.

I don't know what the problem was, just that it did not apply properly.
Take your patch and try to apply it now to my tree and see what
happens...

thanks,

greg k-h


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: SIMRAN SINGHAL <singhalsimran0@gmail.com>
Cc: outreachy-kernel <outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com>,
	devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] staging: rtl8192u: Prefer using the BIT macro
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 08:54:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170225075432.GC1614@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e1cde734-003d-4b3d-bba0-d37f5edd8e2b@googlegroups.com>

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:10:21PM -0800, SIMRAN SINGHAL wrote:
> 
> 
> On Friday, February 24, 2017 at 10:46:21 PM UTC+5:30, gregkh wrote:
> 
>     On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:20:59PM +0530, simran singhal wrote:
>     > Replaces left shift operation (1 << d) by BIT(x) macro.
>     >
>     > Fix the checkpatch.pl issue:
>     > CHECK: Prefer using the BIT macro replacing
>     >
>     > Signed-off-by: simran singhal <singhal...@gmail.com>
>     > ---
>     >  
>     >  V2:
>     >    -modified patch message.
>     >
>     >  drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211.h | 140
>     ++++++++++++-------------
>     >  1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
> 
>     The last chunk of this patch did not apply, please fix up and resend.
> 
>     thanks,
> 
>     greg k-h
> 
> 
>   Can you please elaborate what's the problem with the last chunk of this patch
> and 
>   to be more precise what do you mean by "last chunk of this patch". I am not
> getting 
>   what's the problem with this patch.

I don't know what the problem was, just that it did not apply properly.
Take your patch and try to apply it now to my tree and see what
happens...

thanks,

greg k-h

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-02-25  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-17 17:50 [PATCH v2 3/3] staging: rtl8192u: Prefer using the BIT macro simran singhal
2017-02-24 17:16 ` Greg KH
2017-02-24 20:10   ` SIMRAN SINGHAL
2017-02-24 20:46     ` [Outreachy kernel] " Julia Lawall
2017-02-25  7:54     ` Greg KH [this message]
2017-02-25  7:54       ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170225075432.GC1614@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=singhalsimran0@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.