From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
LKP <lkp@01.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [blk_mq_register_hctx] 29dee3c03a WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5 at lib/refcount.c:114 refcount_inc
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 10:45:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170228094509.GC6536@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170228083804.GB6536@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:38:04AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:17:11AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:11:17PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > FYI, an old blk_mq bug triggers new warnings on this commit. It's very
> > > reproducible and you may try the attached reproduce-* script.
> >
> > > [ 4.447772] kobject (ffff88001c041f10): tried to init an initialized object, something is seriously wrong.
> > > [ 4.453395] CPU: 0 PID: 5 Comm: kworker/u2:0 Not tainted 4.10.0-01216-g29dee3c #2
> > > [ 4.455534] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.9.3-20161025_171302-gandalf 04/01/2014
> > > [ 4.458252] Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
> > > [ 4.459708] Call Trace:
> > > [ 4.460611] dump_stack+0x19/0x27
> > > [ 4.461652] kobject_init+0xda/0xf0
> > > [ 4.462731] blk_mq_register_dev+0x31/0x150
> > > [ 4.463990] blk_register_queue+0x205/0x250
> > > [ 4.465217] device_add_disk+0x1ab/0x710
> > > [ 4.466384] sd_probe_async+0x11c/0x1e0
> > > [ 4.467544] async_run_entry_fn+0xbd/0x220
> > > [ 4.468760] process_one_work+0x4a7/0x990
> > > [ 4.469938] ? process_one_work+0x348/0x990
> > > [ 4.471168] worker_thread+0x342/0x8a0
> > > [ 4.472300] ? process_one_work+0x990/0x990
> > > [ 4.473540] kthread+0x188/0x190
> > > [ 4.474557] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x40/0x40
> > > [ 4.475850] ret_from_fork+0x31/0x40
> >
> > So this was pre-existing wreckage? If so, that needs to be sorted first.
> > Because if the kobject stuff is broken, there's no way the refcount
> > stuff can begin to work.
>
> Google just found me:
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1487758442-5855-2-git-send-email-tom.leiming@gmail.com
>
> Let me see if that works.
Yes, those patches cure the issue.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [blk_mq_register_hctx] 29dee3c03a WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5 at lib/refcount.c:114 refcount_inc
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 10:45:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170228094509.GC6536@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170228083804.GB6536@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1894 bytes --]
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:38:04AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:17:11AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:11:17PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > FYI, an old blk_mq bug triggers new warnings on this commit. It's very
> > > reproducible and you may try the attached reproduce-* script.
> >
> > > [ 4.447772] kobject (ffff88001c041f10): tried to init an initialized object, something is seriously wrong.
> > > [ 4.453395] CPU: 0 PID: 5 Comm: kworker/u2:0 Not tainted 4.10.0-01216-g29dee3c #2
> > > [ 4.455534] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.9.3-20161025_171302-gandalf 04/01/2014
> > > [ 4.458252] Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
> > > [ 4.459708] Call Trace:
> > > [ 4.460611] dump_stack+0x19/0x27
> > > [ 4.461652] kobject_init+0xda/0xf0
> > > [ 4.462731] blk_mq_register_dev+0x31/0x150
> > > [ 4.463990] blk_register_queue+0x205/0x250
> > > [ 4.465217] device_add_disk+0x1ab/0x710
> > > [ 4.466384] sd_probe_async+0x11c/0x1e0
> > > [ 4.467544] async_run_entry_fn+0xbd/0x220
> > > [ 4.468760] process_one_work+0x4a7/0x990
> > > [ 4.469938] ? process_one_work+0x348/0x990
> > > [ 4.471168] worker_thread+0x342/0x8a0
> > > [ 4.472300] ? process_one_work+0x990/0x990
> > > [ 4.473540] kthread+0x188/0x190
> > > [ 4.474557] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x40/0x40
> > > [ 4.475850] ret_from_fork+0x31/0x40
> >
> > So this was pre-existing wreckage? If so, that needs to be sorted first.
> > Because if the kobject stuff is broken, there's no way the refcount
> > stuff can begin to work.
>
> Google just found me:
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1487758442-5855-2-git-send-email-tom.leiming(a)gmail.com
>
> Let me see if that works.
Yes, those patches cure the issue.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-28 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-28 4:11 [blk_mq_register_hctx] 29dee3c03a WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5 at lib/refcount.c:114 refcount_inc Fengguang Wu
2017-02-28 7:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-28 7:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-28 8:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-28 8:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-28 8:35 ` Fengguang Wu
2017-02-28 8:35 ` Fengguang Wu
2017-02-28 8:52 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-02-28 8:52 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-02-28 8:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-28 8:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-28 9:45 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2017-02-28 9:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170228094509.GC6536@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@01.org \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.