* [PATCH v4] staging: dgnc: replace udelay with usleep_range
@ 2017-02-27 16:34 Aishwarya Pant
2017-02-28 6:18 ` Aishwarya Pant
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Aishwarya Pant @ 2017-02-27 16:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lidza Louina, Mark Hounschell, Greg Kroah-Hartman; +Cc: outreachy-kernel
Fix checkpatch warning on dgnc_cls.c : CHECK usleep_range
is preferred over udelay. There is one ocurrence of udelay in
function cls_uart_init with non-atomic context that can be safely
replaced by usleep_range(t, t + delta) where delta is t (as t is
between 10 and 20 microseconds). Also replace usleep_range by udelay in
function cls_flush_uart_write as it is called under a channel lock.
Signed-off-by: Aishwarya Pant <aishpant@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v4:
- Fix commit message formatting
Changes in v3:
- Replace usleep_range by udelay in cls_flush_uart_write
- Fix diff in commit message
Changes in v2:
- Revert usage of usleep_range in atomic context
- Cleanup the commit message
drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_cls.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_cls.c b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_cls.c
index c20ffdd..7068c3b 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_cls.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_cls.c
@@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ static void cls_flush_uart_write(struct channel_t *ch)
writeb((UART_FCR_ENABLE_FIFO | UART_FCR_CLEAR_XMIT),
&ch->ch_cls_uart->isr_fcr);
- usleep_range(10, 20);
+ udelay(10);
ch->ch_flags |= (CH_TX_FIFO_EMPTY | CH_TX_FIFO_LWM);
}
@@ -1096,7 +1096,7 @@ static void cls_uart_init(struct channel_t *ch)
writeb(UART_FCR_ENABLE_FIFO | UART_FCR_CLEAR_RCVR | UART_FCR_CLEAR_XMIT,
&ch->ch_cls_uart->isr_fcr);
- udelay(10);
+ usleep_range(10, 20);
ch->ch_flags |= (CH_FIFO_ENABLED | CH_TX_FIFO_EMPTY | CH_TX_FIFO_LWM);
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4] staging: dgnc: replace udelay with usleep_range
2017-02-27 16:34 [PATCH v4] staging: dgnc: replace udelay with usleep_range Aishwarya Pant
@ 2017-02-28 6:18 ` Aishwarya Pant
2017-03-01 8:02 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Aishwarya Pant @ 2017-02-28 6:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lidza Louina, Mark Hounschell, Greg Kroah-Hartman; +Cc: outreachy-kernel
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:04:45PM +0530, Aishwarya Pant wrote:
> Fix checkpatch warning on dgnc_cls.c : CHECK usleep_range
> is preferred over udelay. There is one ocurrence of udelay in
> function cls_uart_init with non-atomic context that can be safely
> replaced by usleep_range(t, t + delta) where delta is t (as t is
> between 10 and 20 microseconds). Also replace usleep_range by udelay in
> function cls_flush_uart_write as it is called under a channel lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aishwarya Pant <aishpant@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - Fix commit message formatting
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Replace usleep_range by udelay in cls_flush_uart_write
> - Fix diff in commit message
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Revert usage of usleep_range in atomic context
> - Cleanup the commit message
>
> drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_cls.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_cls.c b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_cls.c
> index c20ffdd..7068c3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_cls.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_cls.c
> @@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ static void cls_flush_uart_write(struct channel_t *ch)
>
> writeb((UART_FCR_ENABLE_FIFO | UART_FCR_CLEAR_XMIT),
> &ch->ch_cls_uart->isr_fcr);
> - usleep_range(10, 20);
> + udelay(10);
>
> ch->ch_flags |= (CH_TX_FIFO_EMPTY | CH_TX_FIFO_LWM);
> }
> @@ -1096,7 +1096,7 @@ static void cls_uart_init(struct channel_t *ch)
>
> writeb(UART_FCR_ENABLE_FIFO | UART_FCR_CLEAR_RCVR | UART_FCR_CLEAR_XMIT,
> &ch->ch_cls_uart->isr_fcr);
> - udelay(10);
> + usleep_range(10, 20);
>
> ch->ch_flags |= (CH_FIFO_ENABLED | CH_TX_FIFO_EMPTY | CH_TX_FIFO_LWM);
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Since delays are something I cannot test if it works well on all
hardware, should I move on to some other cleanup and not tamper with
delays?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4] staging: dgnc: replace udelay with usleep_range
2017-02-28 6:18 ` Aishwarya Pant
@ 2017-03-01 8:02 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2017-03-01 8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aishwarya Pant; +Cc: Lidza Louina, Mark Hounschell, outreachy-kernel
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:48:38AM +0530, Aishwarya Pant wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:04:45PM +0530, Aishwarya Pant wrote:
> > Fix checkpatch warning on dgnc_cls.c : CHECK usleep_range
> > is preferred over udelay. There is one ocurrence of udelay in
> > function cls_uart_init with non-atomic context that can be safely
> > replaced by usleep_range(t, t + delta) where delta is t (as t is
> > between 10 and 20 microseconds). Also replace usleep_range by udelay in
> > function cls_flush_uart_write as it is called under a channel lock.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aishwarya Pant <aishpant@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v4:
> > - Fix commit message formatting
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > - Replace usleep_range by udelay in cls_flush_uart_write
> > - Fix diff in commit message
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Revert usage of usleep_range in atomic context
> > - Cleanup the commit message
> >
> > drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_cls.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_cls.c b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_cls.c
> > index c20ffdd..7068c3b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_cls.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_cls.c
> > @@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ static void cls_flush_uart_write(struct channel_t *ch)
> >
> > writeb((UART_FCR_ENABLE_FIFO | UART_FCR_CLEAR_XMIT),
> > &ch->ch_cls_uart->isr_fcr);
> > - usleep_range(10, 20);
> > + udelay(10);
> >
> > ch->ch_flags |= (CH_TX_FIFO_EMPTY | CH_TX_FIFO_LWM);
> > }
> > @@ -1096,7 +1096,7 @@ static void cls_uart_init(struct channel_t *ch)
> >
> > writeb(UART_FCR_ENABLE_FIFO | UART_FCR_CLEAR_RCVR | UART_FCR_CLEAR_XMIT,
> > &ch->ch_cls_uart->isr_fcr);
> > - udelay(10);
> > + usleep_range(10, 20);
> >
> > ch->ch_flags |= (CH_FIFO_ENABLED | CH_TX_FIFO_EMPTY | CH_TX_FIFO_LWM);
> >
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
>
>
> Since delays are something I cannot test if it works well on all
> hardware, should I move on to some other cleanup and not tamper with
> delays?
Yes please.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-03-01 8:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-02-27 16:34 [PATCH v4] staging: dgnc: replace udelay with usleep_range Aishwarya Pant
2017-02-28 6:18 ` Aishwarya Pant
2017-03-01 8:02 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.