From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>,
Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Move bxt exclusive workarounds from gen9 func to bxt one.
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 21:20:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170302192029.GK31595@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1488482129-11719-1-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 11:15:29AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> No functional change. Just a proper organization of the gen9 workarounds.
>
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> index c4d4698..796d652 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> @@ -703,22 +703,6 @@ static int gen9_init_workarounds(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(HALF_SLICE_CHICKEN3,
> GEN9_DISABLE_OCL_OOB_SUPPRESS_LOGIC);
>
> - /* WaDisableDgMirrorFixInHalfSliceChicken5:bxt */
> - if (IS_BXT_REVID(dev_priv, 0, BXT_REVID_A1))
> - WA_CLR_BIT_MASKED(GEN9_HALF_SLICE_CHICKEN5,
> - GEN9_DG_MIRROR_FIX_ENABLE);
> -
> - /* WaSetDisablePixMaskCammingAndRhwoInCommonSliceChicken:bxt */
> - if (IS_BXT_REVID(dev_priv, 0, BXT_REVID_A1)) {
> - WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(GEN7_COMMON_SLICE_CHICKEN1,
> - GEN9_RHWO_OPTIMIZATION_DISABLE);
> - /*
> - * WA also requires GEN9_SLICE_COMMON_ECO_CHICKEN0[14:14] to be set
> - * but we do that in per ctx batchbuffer as there is an issue
> - * with this register not getting restored on ctx restore
> - */
> - }
> -
> /* WaEnableSamplerGPGPUPreemptionSupport:skl,bxt,kbl */
> WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(GEN9_HALF_SLICE_CHICKEN7,
> GEN9_ENABLE_GPGPU_PREEMPTION);
> @@ -732,11 +716,6 @@ static int gen9_init_workarounds(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> WA_CLR_BIT_MASKED(GEN9_HALF_SLICE_CHICKEN5,
> GEN9_CCS_TLB_PREFETCH_ENABLE);
>
> - /* WaDisableMaskBasedCammingInRCC:bxt */
> - if (IS_BXT_REVID(dev_priv, 0, BXT_REVID_A1))
> - WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(SLICE_ECO_CHICKEN0,
> - PIXEL_MASK_CAMMING_DISABLE);
> -
> /* WaForceContextSaveRestoreNonCoherent:skl,bxt,kbl */
> WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(HDC_CHICKEN0,
> HDC_FORCE_CONTEXT_SAVE_RESTORE_NON_COHERENT |
> @@ -882,6 +861,27 @@ static int bxt_init_workarounds(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + /* WaDisableDgMirrorFixInHalfSliceChicken5:bxt */
> + if (IS_BXT_REVID(dev_priv, 0, BXT_REVID_A1))
Hmm. I thought someone had already nuked all BXT pre-production
workarounds. I wonder why these still exist...
> + WA_CLR_BIT_MASKED(GEN9_HALF_SLICE_CHICKEN5,
> + GEN9_DG_MIRROR_FIX_ENABLE);
> +
> + /* WaSetDisablePixMaskCammingAndRhwoInCommonSliceChicken:bxt */
> + if (IS_BXT_REVID(dev_priv, 0, BXT_REVID_A1)) {
> + WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(GEN7_COMMON_SLICE_CHICKEN1,
> + GEN9_RHWO_OPTIMIZATION_DISABLE);
> + /*
> + * WA also requires GEN9_SLICE_COMMON_ECO_CHICKEN0[14:14] to be set
> + * but we do that in per ctx batchbuffer as there is an issue
> + * with this register not getting restored on ctx restore
> + */
> + }
> +
> + /* WaDisableMaskBasedCammingInRCC:bxt */
> + if (IS_BXT_REVID(dev_priv, 0, BXT_REVID_A1))
> + WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(SLICE_ECO_CHICKEN0,
> + PIXEL_MASK_CAMMING_DISABLE);
> +
> /* WaStoreMultiplePTEenable:bxt */
> /* This is a requirement according to Hardware specification */
> if (IS_BXT_REVID(dev_priv, 0, BXT_REVID_A1))
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-02 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-02 19:15 [PATCH] drm/i915: Move bxt exclusive workarounds from gen9 func to bxt one Rodrigo Vivi
2017-03-02 19:20 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2017-03-02 20:27 ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2017-03-03 13:34 ` Imre Deak
2017-03-03 15:37 ` Jani Nikula
2017-03-02 20:18 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170302192029.GK31595@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mika.kuoppala@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.