From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Xiong Zhou <xzhou@redhat.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: remove kmem_zalloc_greedy
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 01:07:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170307000754.GA9959@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170306184109.GC5280@birch.djwong.org>
I like killing it, but shouldn't we just try a normal kmem_zalloc?
At least for the fallback it's the right thing, and even for an
order 2 allocation it seems like a useful first try.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Xiong Zhou <xzhou@redhat.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: remove kmem_zalloc_greedy
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 01:07:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170307000754.GA9959@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170306184109.GC5280@birch.djwong.org>
I like killing it, but shouldn't we just try a normal kmem_zalloc?
At least for the fallback it's the right thing, and even for an
order 2 allocation it seems like a useful first try.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-07 1:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-06 18:41 [PATCH] xfs: remove kmem_zalloc_greedy Darrick J. Wong
2017-03-06 18:41 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-03-07 0:07 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-03-07 0:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-07 0:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-03-07 0:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-03-07 0:54 ` Dave Chinner
2017-03-07 0:54 ` Dave Chinner
2017-03-07 5:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-07 5:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-03-07 11:33 ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-07 11:33 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170307000754.GA9959@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=xzhou@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.