All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@lge.com, Vlastimil Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Do not use double negation for testing page flags
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 12:39:34 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170307173934.GA22291@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1488868597-32222-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org>

On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 03:36:37PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> With the discussion[1], I found it seems there are every PageFlags
> functions return bool at this moment so we don't need double
> negation any more.
> Although it's not a problem to keep it, it makes future users
> confused to use dobule negation for them, too.
> 
> Remove such possibility.
> 
> [1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=148881578820434
> 
> Frankly sepaking, I like every PageFlags return bool instead of int.
> It will make it clear. AFAIR, Chen Gang had tried it but don't know
> why it was not merged at that time.
> 
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1469336184-1904-1-git-send-email-chengang@emindsoft.com.cn
> 
> Cc: Vlastimil Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Cc: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>

Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@lge.com, Vlastimil Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Do not use double negation for testing page flags
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 12:39:34 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170307173934.GA22291@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1488868597-32222-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org>

On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 03:36:37PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> With the discussion[1], I found it seems there are every PageFlags
> functions return bool at this moment so we don't need double
> negation any more.
> Although it's not a problem to keep it, it makes future users
> confused to use dobule negation for them, too.
> 
> Remove such possibility.
> 
> [1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=148881578820434
> 
> Frankly sepaking, I like every PageFlags return bool instead of int.
> It will make it clear. AFAIR, Chen Gang had tried it but don't know
> why it was not merged at that time.
> 
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1469336184-1904-1-git-send-email-chengang@emindsoft.com.cn
> 
> Cc: Vlastimil Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Cc: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>

Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-07 17:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-07  6:36 [PATCH] mm: Do not use double negation for testing page flags Minchan Kim
2017-03-07  6:36 ` Minchan Kim
2017-03-07 16:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
2017-03-07 16:01   ` Anshuman Khandual
2017-03-08  5:25   ` Minchan Kim
2017-03-08  5:25     ` Minchan Kim
2017-03-08  7:51     ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-03-08  7:51       ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-03-08  9:18       ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-08  9:18         ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-09  6:42       ` Minchan Kim
2017-03-09  6:42         ` Minchan Kim
2017-03-07 17:39 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2017-03-07 17:39   ` Johannes Weiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170307173934.GA22291@cmpxchg.org \
    --to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.