Questions about kexec-tools (resend to list)

* Questions about kexec-tools (resend to list)
@ 2017-03-04 23:26 Philip Prindeville
  2017-03-07 14:53 ` Pratyush Anand
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Philip Prindeville @ 2017-03-04 23:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kexec

Hi.

I’m working on a couple of minimal embedded systems, and one of the things I do is platform bring-up (which means dealing with crashes).

We have kexec-tools ported to our distro (OpenWRT/LEDE) but not the OS scripting to integrate them.  I had a couple of questions about Documentation/kdump.txt that I was hoping you all wouldn’t mind answering.

The kernel I’m building (for a Xeon Haswell and an Atom64 Pineview) has:

# CONFIG_SMP is not set
CONFIG_KEXEC=y
CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP=y
CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START=0x1000000
CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y
# CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE is not set
CONFIG_PROC_VMCORE=y
CONFIG_SYSFS=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y

all per the directions above.

The directions say:

> 2) Or use the system kernel binary itself as dump-capture kernel and there is
>  no need to build a separate dump-capture kernel. This is possible
>  only with the architectures which support a relocatable kernel. As
>  of today, i386, x86_64, ppc64, ia64 and arm architectures support relocatable
>  kernel.

so we’ve decided to go this route.  In the section titled "Dump-capture kernel config options (Arch Dependent, i386 and x86_64)”, you write:

> 5) Make and install the kernel and its modules. DO NOT add this kernel
>  to the boot loader configuration files.

In the case of having a single system kernel binary, then you’d have to install this kernel and it’s modules, and add this kernel to the boot loader configuration files, wouldn’t you?  What do my grub arguments look like?

Do I always load my system kernel with “crashkernel=64M@16M” per the “CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START” and here:

> 2) Boot the system kernel with the boot parameter "crashkernel=Y@X",
>  where Y specifies how much memory to reserve for the dump-capture kernel
>  and X specifies the beginning of this reserved memory. For example,
>  "crashkernel=64M@16M" tells the system kernel to reserve 64 MB of memory
>  starting at physical address 0x01000000 (16MB) for the dump-capture kernel.

Okay, we have a 2.6MB /vmlinuz in our /boot partition, so it’s relocatable and this part applies:

> If you are using a compressed bzImage/vmlinuz, then use following command
> to load dump-capture kernel.
> 
>  kexec -p <dump-capture-kernel-bzImage> \
>  --initrd=<initrd-for-dump-capture-kernel> \
>  --append="root=<root-dev> <arch-specific-options>"

Not sure I understand this part.  So if we have a relocatable kernel with crashdump built-in to our system kernel, do we need to load two kernels, just with different <arch-specific-options> and everything else being the same?

Would the <arch-specific-options> be:

crashkernel=64M@16M 1 irqpoll maxcpus=1 reset_devices

in that case?

On a normally running system, using an overlay root, our cmdline looks like:

BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz block2mtd.block2mtd=/dev/sda2,65536,rootfs,5 root=/dev/mtdblock0 rootfstype=squashfs rootwait console=tty0 console=ttyS0,115200n8r noinitrd

so I guess we’d just mash on those extra arguments.  On a running system, our mount points are:

/dev/root on /rom type squashfs (ro,relatime)
proc on /proc type proc (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,noatime)
sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,noatime)
tmpfs on /tmp type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noatime)
tmpfs on /tmp/root type tmpfs (rw,noatime,mode=755)
tmpfs on /dev type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,relatime,size=512k,mode=755)
devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,nosuid,noexec,relatime,mode=600)
debugfs on /sys/kernel/debug type debugfs (rw,noatime)
/dev/mtdblock1 on /overlay type jffs2 (rw,noatime)
overlayfs:/overlay on / type overlay (rw,noatime,lowerdir=/,upperdir=/overlay/upper,workdir=/overlay/work)

but it doesn’t sound like any of that would change (except perhaps mounting a USB thumb-drive if we wanted to copy our crashdump to that device instead).

So if I’ve understood, when the first loaded kernel (the system kernel) crashes, kexec will then try the next kernel it sees…  which will be something like:

kexec -p /boot/vmlinuz \
	—-append=“$(cat /proc/cmdline) irqpoll maxcpus=1 reset_devices 1”

(we don’t use a initrd as you can see above) and that’s described here:

> Kernel Panic
> ============
> 
> After successfully loading the dump-capture kernel as previously
> described, the system will reboot into the dump-capture kernel if a
> system crash is triggered. [snip]

assuming the system isn’t so badly hosed that a WDT expires causing a BIOS reset, etc.

Do both kernels use the same “crashdump=“ value, or do they need different base addresses?

And assuming that you’re using the same kernel, etc. how does the init.d scripting on the crashdump (2nd instance of the kernel) know that it’s not the nominal kernel?  Do we use /sys/kernel/kexec_loaded for this purpose?  Or do we just look for the existence of /proc/vmcore?

And then have something in my init.d scripts like:

kexec_loaded=$(< /sys/kernel/kexec_loaded)

if [ “$kexec_loaded” = 0 ]; then
  kexec -p /boot/vmlinuz \
	—-append=“$(cat /proc/cmdline) irqpoll maxcpus=1 reset_devices 1”
else
  echo “*** HANDLING CRASH DUMP COLLECTION"
  mkdir -p /mnt/crashdrive
  mount LABEL=crashdrive /mnt/crashdrive
  # might do something clever here with “df —output=avail -m /mnt/crashdrive” to make
  # sure I have enough space for the copy, perhaps deleting older dumps until I do…
  cp /proc/vmcore /mnt/crashdrive
  sync
  umount /mnt/crashdrive
  echo “*** NOW REBOOTING"
  reboot -f
fi

Do I need to reboot in a particular way to avoid looping?  The “Kernel Panic” section seems to state that normal reboots won’t be affected.

I appreciate the documentation you’ve written, but it’s a little unclear (to me at least) how to handle the degenerate case of using the same kernel as the system kernel and the crashdump kernel…

I want to make sure that I don’t inadvertently set it up to do looping infinitely nested kernels, etc.

I’m probably overthinking this, but… we’re having crashes in the field and the customers are a little riled up right now so I don’t want to spend a lot of time saying “here try this image”.  They want their smoking gun and they want it soon.

Thanks,

-Philip

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread