From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@suse.de, vbabka@suse.cz,
mhocko@suse.com, riel@redhat.com, shakeelb@google.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
guohanjun@huawei.com, qiuxishi@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mm/vmscan: more restrictive condition for retry in do_try_to_free_pages
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 10:50:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170317145020.GA8106@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1489577808-19228-1-git-send-email-xieyisheng1@huawei.com>
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 07:36:48PM +0800, Yisheng Xie wrote:
> By reviewing code, I find that when enter do_try_to_free_pages, the
> may_thrash is always clear, and it will retry shrink zones to tap
> cgroup's reserves memory by setting may_thrash when the former
> shrink_zones reclaim nothing.
>
> However, when memcg is disabled or on legacy hierarchy, or there do not
> have any memcg protected by low limit, it should not do this useless retry
> at all, for we do not have any cgroup's reserves memory to tap, and we
> have already done hard work but made no progress.
>
> To avoid this unneeded retrying, add a new field in scan_control named
> memcg_low_protection, set it if there is any memcg protected by low limit
> and only do the retry when memcg_low_protection is set while may_thrash
> is clear.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com>
> Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
> Suggested-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
I don't see the point of this patch. It adds more code just to
marginally optimize a near-OOM cold path.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@suse.de, vbabka@suse.cz,
mhocko@suse.com, riel@redhat.com, shakeelb@google.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
guohanjun@huawei.com, qiuxishi@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mm/vmscan: more restrictive condition for retry in do_try_to_free_pages
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 10:50:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170317145020.GA8106@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1489577808-19228-1-git-send-email-xieyisheng1@huawei.com>
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 07:36:48PM +0800, Yisheng Xie wrote:
> By reviewing code, I find that when enter do_try_to_free_pages, the
> may_thrash is always clear, and it will retry shrink zones to tap
> cgroup's reserves memory by setting may_thrash when the former
> shrink_zones reclaim nothing.
>
> However, when memcg is disabled or on legacy hierarchy, or there do not
> have any memcg protected by low limit, it should not do this useless retry
> at all, for we do not have any cgroup's reserves memory to tap, and we
> have already done hard work but made no progress.
>
> To avoid this unneeded retrying, add a new field in scan_control named
> memcg_low_protection, set it if there is any memcg protected by low limit
> and only do the retry when memcg_low_protection is set while may_thrash
> is clear.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com>
> Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
> Suggested-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
I don't see the point of this patch. It adds more code just to
marginally optimize a near-OOM cold path.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-17 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-15 11:36 [PATCH v4] mm/vmscan: more restrictive condition for retry in do_try_to_free_pages Yisheng Xie
2017-03-15 11:36 ` Yisheng Xie
2017-03-15 12:41 ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-15 12:41 ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-16 9:59 ` Yisheng Xie
2017-03-16 9:59 ` Yisheng Xie
2017-03-17 14:50 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2017-03-17 14:50 ` Johannes Weiner
2017-03-17 18:08 ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-17 18:08 ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-17 18:39 ` Johannes Weiner
2017-03-17 18:39 ` Johannes Weiner
2017-03-17 18:45 ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-17 18:45 ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-17 20:00 ` Johannes Weiner
2017-03-17 20:00 ` Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170317145020.GA8106@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=qiuxishi@huawei.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=xieyisheng1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.