All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johan Hovold <johan-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov
	<dmitry.torokhov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Oliver Neukum <oneukum-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-input-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman
	<gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Input: fix NULL-derefs at probe
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 10:13:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170318091331.GG20622@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170317210315.GC26166@dtor-ws>

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 02:03:15PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:53:37AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 03:37:28PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 04:45:52PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 04:15:18PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > > > Am Montag, den 13.03.2017, 13:35 +0100 schrieb Johan Hovold:
> > > > > > This series fixes a number of NULL-pointer dereferences due to
> > > > > > missing endpoint sanity checks that can be triggered by a
> > > > > > malicious USB device.
> > 
> > > Applied the lot.
> > 
> > I noticed you dropped the Fixes tag from the patches that fix bugs which
> > predate git. While this is probably not much of an issue in this case, I
> > think it's generally a bad idea since we're loosing information this
> > way, and this specifically makes it harder for the stable maintainers to
> > figure out which tree to backport a fix to.
> 
> As far as I know the rule is: if no special markings then stable patch
> should be applied as far as it can go.

That's true for the stable tag itself, yes.

> There is no reason to say specify 2.6.12 commit, as in fact the
> offending change is likely to be even earlier, so the annotation would
> be effectively wrong.

It is still the first git commit which has the bug, and everyone
(dealing with code forensics) knows that 1da177e4c3f4
("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") is special.

Adding a Fixes-tag pointing to that initial commit, makes it clear that
bug has indeed been tracked as far back as reasonable. Omission of a
Fixes-tag could on the other hand be due to the submitter not bothering
to track the offending commit, thereby leaving it up to a stable
maintainer to do so (if only just be sure).

Thanks,
Johan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Input: fix NULL-derefs at probe
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 10:13:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170318091331.GG20622@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170317210315.GC26166@dtor-ws>

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 02:03:15PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:53:37AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 03:37:28PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 04:45:52PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 04:15:18PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > > > Am Montag, den 13.03.2017, 13:35 +0100 schrieb Johan Hovold:
> > > > > > This series fixes a number of NULL-pointer dereferences due to
> > > > > > missing endpoint sanity checks that can be triggered by a
> > > > > > malicious USB device.
> > 
> > > Applied the lot.
> > 
> > I noticed you dropped the Fixes tag from the patches that fix bugs which
> > predate git. While this is probably not much of an issue in this case, I
> > think it's generally a bad idea since we're loosing information this
> > way, and this specifically makes it harder for the stable maintainers to
> > figure out which tree to backport a fix to.
> 
> As far as I know the rule is: if no special markings then stable patch
> should be applied as far as it can go.

That's true for the stable tag itself, yes.

> There is no reason to say specify 2.6.12 commit, as in fact the
> offending change is likely to be even earlier, so the annotation would
> be effectively wrong.

It is still the first git commit which has the bug, and everyone
(dealing with code forensics) knows that 1da177e4c3f4
("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") is special.

Adding a Fixes-tag pointing to that initial commit, makes it clear that
bug has indeed been tracked as far back as reasonable. Omission of a
Fixes-tag could on the other hand be due to the submitter not bothering
to track the offending commit, thereby leaving it up to a stable
maintainer to do so (if only just be sure).

Thanks,
Johan

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-18  9:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-13 12:35 [PATCH 0/7] Input: fix NULL-derefs at probe Johan Hovold
2017-03-13 12:35 ` [PATCH 1/7] Input: iforce - fix NULL-deref " Johan Hovold
     [not found] ` <20170313123539.28103-1-johan-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2017-03-13 12:35   ` [PATCH 2/7] Input: cm109 " Johan Hovold
2017-03-13 12:35     ` Johan Hovold
2017-03-13 15:15   ` [PATCH 0/7] Input: fix NULL-derefs " Oliver Neukum
2017-03-13 15:15     ` Oliver Neukum
2017-03-13 15:45     ` Johan Hovold
2017-03-16 22:37       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2017-03-17 10:53         ` Johan Hovold
2017-03-17 21:03           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2017-03-18  9:13             ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2017-03-18  9:13               ` Johan Hovold
2017-03-13 12:35 ` [PATCH 3/7] Input: ims-pcu - fix NULL-deref " Johan Hovold
2017-03-13 12:35 ` [PATCH 4/7] Input: yealink " Johan Hovold
2017-03-13 12:35 ` [PATCH 5/7] Input: hanwang " Johan Hovold
2017-03-13 12:35 ` [PATCH 6/7] Input: kbtab " Johan Hovold
2017-03-13 12:35 ` [PATCH 7/7] Input: sur40 " Johan Hovold

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170318091331.GG20622@localhost \
    --to=johan-dgejt+ai2ygdnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-input-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=oneukum-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.