All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: vcaputo@pengaru.com
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: hughd@google.com, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] shmem: fix __shmem_file_setup error path leaks
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 17:52:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170328005227.GW802@shells.gnugeneration.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170327212127.GF29622@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:21:27PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:05:34AM -0700, Vito Caputo wrote:
> > The existing path and memory cleanups appear to be in reverse order, and
> > there's no iput() potentially leaking the inode in the last two error gotos.
> > 
> > Also make put_memory shmem_unacct_size() conditional on !inode since if we
> > entered cleanup at put_inode, shmem_evict_inode() occurs via
> > iput()->iput_final(), which performs the shmem_unacct_size() for us.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vito Caputo <vcaputo@pengaru.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > This caught my eye while looking through the memfd_create() implementation.
> > Included patch was compile tested only...
> 
> Obviously so, since you've just introduced a double iput() there.  After
>         d_instantiate(path.dentry, inode);
> dropping the reference to path.dentry (done by path_put(&path)) will drop
> the reference to inode transferred into that dentry by d_instantiate().
> NAK.

I see, so it's correct as-is, thanks for the review and apologies for the
noise!

Cheers,
Vito Caputo

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: vcaputo@pengaru.com
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: hughd@google.com, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] shmem: fix __shmem_file_setup error path leaks
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 17:52:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170328005227.GW802@shells.gnugeneration.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170327212127.GF29622@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:21:27PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:05:34AM -0700, Vito Caputo wrote:
> > The existing path and memory cleanups appear to be in reverse order, and
> > there's no iput() potentially leaking the inode in the last two error gotos.
> > 
> > Also make put_memory shmem_unacct_size() conditional on !inode since if we
> > entered cleanup at put_inode, shmem_evict_inode() occurs via
> > iput()->iput_final(), which performs the shmem_unacct_size() for us.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vito Caputo <vcaputo@pengaru.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > This caught my eye while looking through the memfd_create() implementation.
> > Included patch was compile tested only...
> 
> Obviously so, since you've just introduced a double iput() there.  After
>         d_instantiate(path.dentry, inode);
> dropping the reference to path.dentry (done by path_put(&path)) will drop
> the reference to inode transferred into that dentry by d_instantiate().
> NAK.

I see, so it's correct as-is, thanks for the review and apologies for the
noise!

Cheers,
Vito Caputo

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-28  0:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-27 17:05 [PATCH] shmem: fix __shmem_file_setup error path leaks Vito Caputo
2017-03-27 17:05 ` Vito Caputo
2017-03-27 21:21 ` Al Viro
2017-03-27 21:21   ` Al Viro
2017-03-28  0:52   ` vcaputo [this message]
2017-03-28  0:52     ` vcaputo
2017-03-28  3:54 ` Hillf Danton
2017-03-28  3:54   ` Hillf Danton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170328005227.GW802@shells.gnugeneration.com \
    --to=vcaputo@pengaru.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.