From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@gmail.com>,
Pratyush Anand <pratyush.anand@gmail.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@freescale.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@apm.com>,
Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@ti.com>,
Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>, Wenrui Li <wenrui.li@rock-chips.com>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
Minghuan Lian <minghuan.Lian@freescale.com>,
Jon Mason <jonmason@broadcom.com>,
Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@mm-sol.com>,
Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>,
Roy Zang <tie-fei.zang@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/22] asm-generic/io.h: add ioremap_nopost remap interface
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 17:21:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170406162156.GA10134@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170406130727.GE17774@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 02:07:27PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 01:59:07PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 12:38:45PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > Ok but where ? linux/io.h or asm-generic/io.h ? As I replied to Russell,
> > > having it in linux/io.h is a bit odd given that it would be the only
> > > ioremap_* implementation declared there, I think we need more
> > > consistency here instead of deviating again from what you did.
> >
> > asm-generic/io.h is the right place for generics which let you override.
>
> I disagree for two reasons, and I will refer you to Linus' comments back
> in 2005 at http://yarchive.net/comp/linux/generic.html
>
> 1) asm-generic/io.h has become an ifdef mess, every single definition in
> there is conditional. The reason for this has happened is that
> architectures can't pick and choose what they want from a single file
> unless something like that is done. It would be _far_ better to
> split this file up by functional group - eg, ISA IO accessors,
> io(read|write)*(), read|write*(), and so forth.
>
> 2) We're at the point where we have various .c files around the kernel
> _directly_ including asm-generic header files, which means the
> use of asm-generic headers is no longer a choice of the architecture.
>
> 3) asm-generic/ started out life as the place where example
> implementations of asm/*.h header files were found, and but has
> grown into a place where we dump default implementations. We had
> a place for default implementations for years, which were the
> linux/*.h headers. We have now ended up with a mixture of both
> techniques, even for something like io.h, we have the messy
> asm-generic/io.h, the architecture's asm/io.h, and then linux/io.h.
> We have ended up with both linux/io.h and asm-generic/io.h containing
> default definitions.
>
> We've had the rule that where both linux/foo.h and asm/foo.h exist, the
> linux/ counterpart is the preferred include file. That didn't really
> happen with asm/io.h due to the number of users that there were, but
> when new stuff was added to asm/io.h which we wanted to be generic,
> linux/io.h was created to contain that. This actually pre-dates the
> "let's clutter up asm-generic with shared arch stuff" push.
>
> Now, what you say _may_ make sense if we have an
> asm-generic/ioremap-nopost.h header which just defines a default
> ioremap_nopost.h implementation, and architectures would then be able to
> choose whether to include that or not depending on whether they provide
> their own implementation. No ugly ifdefs are necessary with that
> approach.
>
> Out of the three choices, I would much rather see the
> asm-generic/ioremap-nopost.h approach. However, the down-side to that
> is it means all architectures asm/io.h would need to be touched to
> explicitly include that.
>
> What I'm absolutely certain of, though, is that making asm-generic/io.h
> even worse by adding yet more conditional stuff to it is not a sane way
> forward.
Ok, so:
(1) I can do asm-generic/ioremap-nopost.h, which I assume you want to
contain something like
static inline void __iomem *ioremap_nopost(phys_addr_t offset, size_t size)
{
return ioremap_nocache(offset, size);
}
Funny bit is that it has to be included by asm*/io.h files _after_
ioremap_nocache has been #defined (that's the reason my approach was
failing miserably even on arches like eg powerpc (see [1] below) that
does have ioremap_nocache), not sure it is going to be very nice to have
an include in the middle of asm*/io.h include files (and I have to patch
all arches which I can do).
Or
(2) I add:
#ifndef ioremap_nopost
static inline void __iomem *ioremap_nopost(phys_addr_t offset, size_t size)
{
return NULL; <-(making it return ioremap_nocache() does not
work, see [1] for the reason)
}
#endif
in linux/io.h
(3) ioremap_nopost follows Luis' ioremap_uc approach
(1)-(2) bypass completely what Luis did for ioremap_uc(), which implies
that we have yet another way of implementing ioremap_*.
I would like to get this patchset done so if you have an opinion it
is time to state it.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
[1] powerpc build report:
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lpieralisi/linux.git pci/config-io-mappings-fix-v3
head: 283a324b549a662346c95c05b08983dd5b83354b
commit: e66b493fe93226c02b1a33355f79db7ed6efe718 [2/23] linux/io.h: add ioremap_nopost remap interface
config: powerpc-defconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: powerpc64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705
reproduce:
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/01org/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
git checkout e66b493fe93226c02b1a33355f79db7ed6efe718
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make.cross ARCH=powerpc
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:28:0,
from arch/powerpc/oprofile/op_model_cell.c:29:
include/linux/io.h: In function 'ioremap_nopost':
include/linux/io.h:169:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'ioremap_nocache' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
return ioremap_nocache(offset, size);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/io.h:169:9: error: return makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion]
return ioremap_nocache(offset, size);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
vim +169 include/linux/io.h
163 }
164 #endif
165
166 #ifndef ioremap_nopost
167 static inline void __iomem *ioremap_nopost(phys_addr_t offset, size_t size)
168 {
> 169 return ioremap_nocache(offset, size);
170 }
171 #endif
172
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (Lorenzo Pieralisi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 02/22] asm-generic/io.h: add ioremap_nopost remap interface
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 17:21:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170406162156.GA10134@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170406130727.GE17774@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 02:07:27PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 01:59:07PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 12:38:45PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > Ok but where ? linux/io.h or asm-generic/io.h ? As I replied to Russell,
> > > having it in linux/io.h is a bit odd given that it would be the only
> > > ioremap_* implementation declared there, I think we need more
> > > consistency here instead of deviating again from what you did.
> >
> > asm-generic/io.h is the right place for generics which let you override.
>
> I disagree for two reasons, and I will refer you to Linus' comments back
> in 2005 at http://yarchive.net/comp/linux/generic.html
>
> 1) asm-generic/io.h has become an ifdef mess, every single definition in
> there is conditional. The reason for this has happened is that
> architectures can't pick and choose what they want from a single file
> unless something like that is done. It would be _far_ better to
> split this file up by functional group - eg, ISA IO accessors,
> io(read|write)*(), read|write*(), and so forth.
>
> 2) We're at the point where we have various .c files around the kernel
> _directly_ including asm-generic header files, which means the
> use of asm-generic headers is no longer a choice of the architecture.
>
> 3) asm-generic/ started out life as the place where example
> implementations of asm/*.h header files were found, and but has
> grown into a place where we dump default implementations. We had
> a place for default implementations for years, which were the
> linux/*.h headers. We have now ended up with a mixture of both
> techniques, even for something like io.h, we have the messy
> asm-generic/io.h, the architecture's asm/io.h, and then linux/io.h.
> We have ended up with both linux/io.h and asm-generic/io.h containing
> default definitions.
>
> We've had the rule that where both linux/foo.h and asm/foo.h exist, the
> linux/ counterpart is the preferred include file. That didn't really
> happen with asm/io.h due to the number of users that there were, but
> when new stuff was added to asm/io.h which we wanted to be generic,
> linux/io.h was created to contain that. This actually pre-dates the
> "let's clutter up asm-generic with shared arch stuff" push.
>
> Now, what you say _may_ make sense if we have an
> asm-generic/ioremap-nopost.h header which just defines a default
> ioremap_nopost.h implementation, and architectures would then be able to
> choose whether to include that or not depending on whether they provide
> their own implementation. No ugly ifdefs are necessary with that
> approach.
>
> Out of the three choices, I would much rather see the
> asm-generic/ioremap-nopost.h approach. However, the down-side to that
> is it means all architectures asm/io.h would need to be touched to
> explicitly include that.
>
> What I'm absolutely certain of, though, is that making asm-generic/io.h
> even worse by adding yet more conditional stuff to it is not a sane way
> forward.
Ok, so:
(1) I can do asm-generic/ioremap-nopost.h, which I assume you want to
contain something like
static inline void __iomem *ioremap_nopost(phys_addr_t offset, size_t size)
{
return ioremap_nocache(offset, size);
}
Funny bit is that it has to be included by asm*/io.h files _after_
ioremap_nocache has been #defined (that's the reason my approach was
failing miserably even on arches like eg powerpc (see [1] below) that
does have ioremap_nocache), not sure it is going to be very nice to have
an include in the middle of asm*/io.h include files (and I have to patch
all arches which I can do).
Or
(2) I add:
#ifndef ioremap_nopost
static inline void __iomem *ioremap_nopost(phys_addr_t offset, size_t size)
{
return NULL; <-(making it return ioremap_nocache() does not
work, see [1] for the reason)
}
#endif
in linux/io.h
(3) ioremap_nopost follows Luis' ioremap_uc approach
(1)-(2) bypass completely what Luis did for ioremap_uc(), which implies
that we have yet another way of implementing ioremap_*.
I would like to get this patchset done so if you have an opinion it
is time to state it.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
[1] powerpc build report:
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lpieralisi/linux.git pci/config-io-mappings-fix-v3
head: 283a324b549a662346c95c05b08983dd5b83354b
commit: e66b493fe93226c02b1a33355f79db7ed6efe718 [2/23] linux/io.h: add ioremap_nopost remap interface
config: powerpc-defconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: powerpc64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705
reproduce:
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/01org/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
git checkout e66b493fe93226c02b1a33355f79db7ed6efe718
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make.cross ARCH=powerpc
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:28:0,
from arch/powerpc/oprofile/op_model_cell.c:29:
include/linux/io.h: In function 'ioremap_nopost':
include/linux/io.h:169:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'ioremap_nocache' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
return ioremap_nocache(offset, size);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/io.h:169:9: error: return makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion]
return ioremap_nocache(offset, size);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
vim +169 include/linux/io.h
163 }
164 #endif
165
166 #ifndef ioremap_nopost
167 static inline void __iomem *ioremap_nopost(phys_addr_t offset, size_t size)
168 {
> 169 return ioremap_nocache(offset, size);
170 }
171 #endif
172
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-06 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 115+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-27 9:49 [PATCH v2 00/22] PCI: fix config and I/O Address space memory mappings Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 01/22] PCI: remove __weak tag from pci_remap_iospace() Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 02/22] asm-generic/io.h: add ioremap_nopost remap interface Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-28 1:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-03-28 1:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-03-28 1:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-03-28 14:45 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-28 14:45 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-30 16:47 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-03-30 16:47 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-03-30 16:47 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-04-05 10:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-04-05 10:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-04-05 12:38 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-04-05 12:38 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-04-06 10:26 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-04-06 10:26 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-04-06 10:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-04-06 10:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-04-10 14:30 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-04-10 14:30 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-04-06 10:53 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-04-06 10:53 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-04-06 11:38 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-04-06 11:38 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-04-06 11:59 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-04-06 11:59 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-04-06 13:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-04-06 13:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-04-06 16:21 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2017-04-06 16:21 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-04-06 16:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-04-06 16:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-04-06 17:09 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-04-06 17:09 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-04-06 17:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-04-06 17:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-04-06 12:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-04-06 12:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-04-06 12:25 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-04-06 12:25 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-03-27 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 03/22] asm-generic/pgtable.h: introduce pgprot_nonposted remap attribute Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 04/22] PCI: fix pci_remap_iospace() " Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 05/22] ARM64: implement ioremap_nopost() interface Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-30 16:19 ` Will Deacon
2017-03-30 16:19 ` Will Deacon
2017-03-30 16:19 ` Will Deacon
2017-03-27 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 06/22] ARM: " Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-31 11:08 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-31 11:08 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-31 11:08 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-04-05 10:21 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-04-05 10:21 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-04-05 10:21 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 07/22] PCI: ECAM: use ioremap_nopost() to map config region Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-30 16:20 ` Will Deacon
2017-03-30 16:20 ` Will Deacon
2017-03-30 16:20 ` Will Deacon
2017-03-27 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 08/22] lib: implement Devres ioremap_nopost() interface Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-28 1:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-03-28 1:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-03-28 1:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-03-28 14:50 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-28 14:50 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-28 15:55 ` Tejun Heo
2017-03-28 15:55 ` Tejun Heo
2017-03-27 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 09/22] PCI: xilinx: update PCI config space remap function Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 10/22] PCI: xilinx-nwl: " Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 11/22] PCI: spear13xx: " Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 12/22] PCI: rockchip: " Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 13/22] PCI: qcom: " Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 14/22] PCI: iproc-platform: " Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 15/22] PCI: hisi: " Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 16/22] PCI: designware: " Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 17/22] PCI: armada8k: " Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 18/22] PCI: xgene: " Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 19/22] PCI: tegra: " Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 20/22] PCI: layerscape: " Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 21/22] PCI: keystone-dw: " Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 22/22] PCI: versatile: " Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-27 9:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170406162156.GA10134@red-moon \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=hskinnemoen@gmail.com \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=jonmason@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=m-karicheri2@ti.com \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
--cc=minghuan.Lian@freescale.com \
--cc=mingkai.hu@freescale.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pratyush.anand@gmail.com \
--cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=svarbanov@mm-sol.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=tie-fei.zang@freescale.com \
--cc=tinamdar@apm.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
--cc=wenrui.li@rock-chips.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.