All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>, Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	Linux Block Layer Mailinglist <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: bios with an offset are always gappy
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 11:56:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170413095630.GE6734@linux-x5ow.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170413094835.GA28413@lst.de>

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:48:35AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I think we should also turns this into a WARN_ON_ONCE + error return..
> 
> But do you have an exact btrfsprogs version and command line?  I do a lot
> of testing that involves mkfs.btrfs on nvme and haven't seen it..

Sure, it's:
mkfs.btrfs, part of btrfs-progs v4.5.3+20160729

Qemu is 2.6.2

[...]

> 
> I think the code in NVMe (and potentially the other drivers using
> virt_queue_boundary) is bogus.  All of them are actually fine with
> gaps in the protocol, as long as the gaps are aligned to said boundary.
> 
> So I suspect what we really need is to fix up NVMe, and after that
> we could even relax the above check, to not check for offset but
> offset & queue_virt_boundary(q).

That's what I tried doing the last two days but as we're rather late in the rc
cycle and it is a regression that came in with -rc1 I'd rather like to have it
fixed or at least have a band aid in place.

Byte,
	Johannes

-- 
Johannes Thumshirn                                          Storage
jthumshirn@suse.de                                +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-13  9:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-13  8:06 [PATCH] block: bios with an offset are always gappy Johannes Thumshirn
2017-04-13  9:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-13  9:56   ` Johannes Thumshirn [this message]
2017-04-13 10:01   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-04-13 10:02 ` Ming Lei
2017-04-13 10:10   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-04-13 11:53   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-04-13 12:11     ` Ming Lei
     [not found]       ` <20170413122010.GJ6734@linux-x5ow.site>
2017-04-13 13:44         ` Ming Lei
2017-04-13 14:45     ` Ming Lei
2017-04-13 14:50       ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-04-13 20:35       ` Andreas Mohr
2017-04-14  1:15         ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170413095630.GE6734@linux-x5ow.site \
    --to=jthumshirn@suse.de \
    --cc=Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=osandov@osandov.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.