[lkp-robot] [KEYS] bdf7c0f8bf: ltp.add_key02.fail

[ebiggers3@gmail.com (Eric Biggers)]

On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 02:26:41PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> 
> FYI, we noticed the following commit:
> 
> commit: bdf7c0f8bf282ba44827ce3c7fd7936c8e90a18a ("KEYS: fix dereferencing NULL payload with nonzero length")
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Eric-Biggers/KEYS-fix-dereferencing-NULL-payload-with-nonzero-length/20170403-102013
> base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/linux-security.git next
> 
...
> caused below changes (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace):
> 
> 
> user  :notice: [   45.447047] <<<test_start>>>
> 
> user  :notice: [   45.447365] tag=add_key02 stime=1492169102
> 
> user  :notice: [   45.447567] cmdline="add_key02"
> 
> user  :notice: [   45.447685] contacts=""
> 
> user  :notice: [   45.447826] analysis=exit
> 
> user  :notice: [   45.448011] <<<test_output>>>
> 
> user  :notice: [   45.448568] tst_test.c:760: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
> 
> user  :notice: [   45.449439] add_key02.c:65: FAIL: add_key() failed unexpectedly, expected EINVAL: EFAULT

In my opinion this is a valid behavior, and the test is just weird; it's passing
in *both* an unaddressable payload and an invalid description, so it's not clear
which case it's meant to be testing.  (Generally, if a syscall will fail for
more than one reason, it's not guaranteed which error code you'll get.)

In any case, once we have a fix merged, it would be nice for there to be an ltp
test added for the "NULL payload with nonzero length" case with one of the key
types that crashed the kernel.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html