From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Cc: richard@nod.at, dwmw2@infradead.org, computersforpeace@gmail.com,
marek.vasut@gmail.com, cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mark.marshall@omicronenergy.com, b44839@freescale.com,
prabhakar@freescale.com
Subject: [PATCH] nand_base: optimize checking of erased buffers
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 12:51:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170421105107.GA7259@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170420114057.GA4705@amd>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 963 bytes --]
If we see ~0UL in flash, there's no need for hweight, and no need to
check number of bitflips. So this should be net win.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
index b0524f8..96c27ec 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
@@ -1357,7 +1357,10 @@ static int nand_check_erased_buf(void *buf, int len, int bitflips_threshold)
for (; len >= sizeof(long);
len -= sizeof(long), bitmap += sizeof(long)) {
- weight = hweight_long(*((unsigned long *)bitmap));
+ unsigned long d = *((unsigned long *)bitmap);
+ if (d == ~0UL)
+ continue;
+ weight = hweight_long(d);
bitflips += BITS_PER_LONG - weight;
if (unlikely(bitflips > bitflips_threshold))
return -EBADMSG;
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-21 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-19 12:13 fsl_ifc_nand: are blank pages protected by ECC? Pavel Machek
2017-04-19 21:18 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-04-19 22:15 ` Pavel Machek
2017-04-19 22:27 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-04-20 11:40 ` Pavel Machek
2017-04-20 12:15 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-04-21 10:51 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2017-05-17 11:27 ` [PATCH] nand_base: optimize checking of erased buffers Mason
2017-05-17 11:39 ` Mason
2017-05-17 11:52 ` Pavel Machek
2017-05-17 12:22 ` [PATCH] fsl_ifc_nand: fix handing of bit flips in erased nand Pavel Machek
2017-05-17 12:32 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-17 13:00 ` Pavel Machek
2017-05-17 13:25 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-17 20:03 ` [PATCH] mtd: nand: fsl_ifc: fix handing of bit flips in erased pages Pavel Machek
2017-05-31 20:59 ` [PATCHv2] " Pavel Machek
2017-05-31 22:59 ` Darwin Dingel
2017-06-01 1:09 ` Darwin Dingel
2017-06-01 13:12 ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-01 13:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-06-07 7:31 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-04-21 10:08 ` fsl_ifc_nand: are blank pages protected by ECC? Pavel Machek
2017-04-21 10:12 ` Richard Weinberger
2017-04-21 12:04 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-04-21 13:37 ` Pavel Machek
2017-04-21 13:49 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-04-22 7:01 ` Pavel Machek
2017-04-22 10:40 ` [PATCH] tango_nand.c: fix ecc.stats_corrected in empty flash case Pavel Machek
2017-04-24 8:58 ` Marc Gonzalez
2017-04-24 9:03 ` Pavel Machek
2017-05-02 9:42 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-02 11:52 ` Marc Gonzalez
2017-05-02 12:20 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-03 20:02 ` Pavel Machek
2017-05-03 20:04 ` Pavel Machek
2017-05-04 8:42 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-12 15:34 ` [PATCH] mtd: nand: tango: Update ecc_stats.corrected Marc Gonzalez
2017-05-15 8:56 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-15 20:47 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-17 12:04 ` [PATCH] tango_nand.c: fix ecc.stats_corrected in empty flash case Pavel Machek
2017-04-23 9:58 ` tango_nand: is logic right in error cases? (was Re: fsl_ifc_nand: are blank pages protected by ECC?) Pavel Machek
2017-04-24 7:12 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170421105107.GA7259@amd \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=b44839@freescale.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=mark.marshall@omicronenergy.com \
--cc=prabhakar@freescale.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.