Re: [RFC PATCH] KASLR: mem_avoid_memmap_index can be static

[Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>]

Hi Fengguang,

Thanks for pointing it out!

I am fine with defining mem_avoid_memmap_index it as static variable.
While Liyang suggested using a local static inside mem_avoid_memmap,
then mem_avoid_memmap_index is not needed any more. Do you think it's OK
to you?

Thanks
Baoquan

On 04/24/17 at 04:48pm, kbuild test robot wrote:
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> ---
>  kaslr.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> index 6649ecd..7190d35 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ struct mem_vector {
>  #define MAX_MEMMAP_REGIONS	4
>  
>  static bool memmap_too_large;
> -int mem_avoid_memmap_index;
> +static int mem_avoid_memmap_index;
>  extern unsigned long get_cmd_line_ptr(void);
>  
>